zane vs arnold

[RottenWillow]

Speaking of bodyfat percentages, here's an example of someone WAY before his time in that respect.

http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/drobson35abig.jpg

The O judges thought Padilla was too ripped and punished him with 5th place. Too ripped....imagine anyone saying that these days.

 

[chazk]

I cant agree. I feel pretty sure that's a shot of Frank taken between '82 and '83. Despite no longer winning any O's at that point, he was in absolute peak condition. All the Zane strengths were still there, plus even thinner skin and better overall conditioning.

yes best condition

I ment thats not best pic of zane. sorry i did not make myself clear

always thought zane looked better making a bicep then having the other hand extended up in the air over his head thats the shot that really shows franks abs or the double over head reach while he flexes his midsection.
that pic dose not show the midsection definition as well as other pics and poses

that pic of danny is freaking sick knowing its 20 years old. its black and whoite really shows the grainy texture better then color the dude is a anatomey chart..

 

[pursuit]

What weight would Zane be if he was scaled up to 6'2.? Here is your answer.
It is increasse in height squared multiplied by his weight.

(6'2/5'9) squared = (74/69) squared x 180 = 207 lbs

That is significantly lighter than Arnold, yeah he was more diced.
What look do you prefer is what it comes down to..
The man in my avatar had a sick V-taper so he gets my vote!

 

[chazk]

What weight would Zane be if he was scaled up to 6'2.? Here is your answer.
It is increasse in height squared multiplied by his weight.

(6'2/5'9) squared = (74/69) squared x 180 = 207 lbs

That is significantly lighter than Arnold, yeah he was more diced.
What look do you prefer is what it comes down to..
The man in my avatar had a sick V-taper so he gets my vote!

my figures were wrong frank was 180 in 1977
lets go with frank at his peak 198lbs 6% bf in 1982
can you scale that up for me?

 

[pursuit]

Okay..

(74/69) squared x 198 = 227.7 lbs

 

[chazk]

Okay..

(74/69) squared x 198 = 227.7 lbs

their we have it 227.5 shredded on stage at 6'2 frank zane vs arnold at 6'2 235lbs at 7%
now that would be a killer pose down frank being only a few pounds lighter !
.
I almost wish someone could scale up a photo of frankzane and scale down a pic of arnold so we could see them side by side what they would look like at the same height.

arnold def had the biceps and chest but zane had the abs , the taper and symetry


thanks pursuit

you just really put things into perspective a bit better for me and everyone else.

 

[chazk]

just for fun i scaled these two pics one of arnold and one of frank to get a better idea had frank been 6'2 ( or arnold was only 5'9)what the two might have looked something like side by side

http://i5.tinypic.com/2vb34o4.jpg

 

[jochensa]

the bodybuilders from the golden age had some incredible physiques. serge nubret, oliva, etc. arnold i think had the best overall. mostly due to the size/mass ratio. you don't see even today guys over 6 ft winning the "o" but the 5'9"'s are adime a dozen. it is alot tuffer to acheive the density for us taller guys, alot easier to get injured too. we all have the same ligaments. origins, and insertions. made outta the same material is what i mean. IMO shorter guys have a better lever system when muscle growth is concerned


but as far as zane not being lower than 6 %, dont kid yoself. i was 5.3% with no diet and not precontest. i was playing football on a daily basis. there were guys on my team that were lower than that too, with no diet or gear. bodybuilders get to dangeroulsy low BF levels on the regular

 

[youngguns]

the bodybuilders from the golden age had some incredible physiques. serge nubret, oliva, etc. arnold i think had the best overall. mostly due to the size/mass ratio. you don't see even today guys over 6 ft winning the "o" but the 5'9"'s are adime a dozen. it is alot tuffer to acheive the density for us taller guys, alot easier to get injured too. we all have the same ligaments. origins, and insertions. made outta the same material is what i mean. IMO shorter guys have a better lever system when muscle growth is concerned


but as far as zane not being lower than 6 %, dont kid yoself. i was 5.3% with no diet and not precontest. i was playing football on a daily basis. there were guys on my team that were lower than that too, with no diet or gear. bodybuilders get to dangeroulsy low BF levels on the regular

hello im jochensa, I dont know my ass from my mouth. Shut up please.

 

[jochensa]

hello im jochensa, I dont know my ass from my mouth. Shut up please.

haha speaking of diarhea of the mouth. you have a chronic case my friend. 20yrs old talking smack, what is this world coming to