if people step to the flamerama type board and get their feelings hurt, fuck them then...it takes a bit of thick skin and they should know that going in.Mavafanculo said:we learned nothing from the lessons of Flamerama?
no holds barred and anything goes sounds cool, but in practice people end up getting hurt IRL, end up leaving the site, and will STILL become an admin problem when things get out of hand. maybe even a legal problem for providing a forum that encourages libel or harrassment
and even tho its suppossed to be confined to one forum, it'll still spill over in the others. when user_a rips user_b a new asshole in Uncensored, are they just going to forget about it and act civil in Chat?
too far in either direction isnt good imo - where it is now seems about right - nobody's happy so it must be balanced. the buttcheekclenchers say its out of control and the maniacs say it too reserved. that means its perfect
click on what you want to read, dont click on what you dont want to read.
just needs more noooooods is all.
-
the_clockwork said:the way the board is now is the reason I'm not plat..
too much BS with biased mods.. there needs to be printed rules and thats all that is enforced. there's no way in hell to keep this board undercontrol with people coming to it. It will be extremely boring (more than now) and customers will leave real fast!
Vagabino said:if people step to the flamerama type board and get their feelings hurt, fuck them then...it takes a bit of thick skin and they should know that going in.
uncensored is the only way to go so peeps can air shit out
lol you keep some weird hours broKillahBee said:Also, wtf am I talking about? Am I even awake right now?
Vagabino said:lol you keep some weird hours bro
fucking up early
.................the_clockwork said:the way the board is now is the reason I'm not plat..
too much BS with biased mods.. there needs to be printed rules and thats all that is enforced. there's no way in hell to keep this board undercontrol with people coming to it. It will be extremely boring (more than now) and customers will leave real fast!
patsfan1379 said:A "shitload of fucking obscenities" in a thread complaining about the "shitload of fucking obscenities"?
Jon79 said:id like to see more tits n ass
and less mo shit
the_clockwork said:the way the board is now is the reason I'm not plat..
too much BS with biased mods.. there needs to be printed rules and thats all that is enforced. there's no way in hell to keep this board undercontrol with people coming to it. It will be extremely boring (more than now) and customers will leave real fast!
AAP said:Who is biased? Which one of the mods on this chat board. You can PM me if you don't want to post it.
It can't be me. I mean, I am scheduled to be biased until Febuary. I am committed to being racist the rest of this month. And then I am going to be shady for the whole month of January. Then biased in Feb.
Or is this a preemptive complaint?
I think I am still on vacation.AAP said:Who is biased? Which one of the mods on this chat board. You can PM me if you don't want to post it.
It can't be me. I mean, I am scheduled to be biased until Febuary. I am committed to being racist the rest of this month. And then I am going to be shady for the whole month of January. Then biased in Feb.
Or is this a preemptive complaint?
needtogetaas said:I think I am still on vacation.
AAP said:Who is biased? Which one of the mods on this chat board. You can PM me if you don't want to post it.
It can't be me. I mean, I am scheduled to be biased until Febuary. I am committed to being racist the rest of this month. And then I am going to be shady for the whole month of January. Then biased in Feb.
Or is this a preemptive complaint?
AAP said:Who is biased? Which one of the mods on this chat board. You can PM me if you don't want to post it.
It can't be me. I mean, I am scheduled to be biased until Febuary. I am committed to being racist the rest of this month. And then I am going to be shady for the whole month of January. Then biased in Feb.
Or is this a preemptive complaint?
patsfan1379 said:I'd say mods hawking sponsors products is pretty biased. LOL.
redguru said:Then deleting posts that provide peer-reviewed research contradicting claims by the said sponsor.
patsfan1379 said:I'd say mods hawking sponsors products is pretty biased. LOL.
AAP said:I don't hawk products or sponsors.
I will admit that I support AG Guys and one other simply because IT WORKS. That's all. I am not telling you that there is not anything else out there just as good (because I haven't tried others) but I will tell you that it definately worked for me.
I have been here, what?, six years and only spoke up regarding two products that I liked. That's not a bad record.
As a matter of fact there are sponsors/products here that I vehemently dislike and would never recommend them.
If you notice someone - mod or not - being biased towards one product, that should be a clue not to seek out their opinion but rather ask someone else.
The "shock" effect wears out, in that the people who are doing it get bored with it sooner or later, or the community brings them into line themselves ... and let's face it, once in a while even the most gentile of us like something salacious.Big Rick Rock said:Guys,
I have been looking at some of the thread posted on here today, and noticed that little by little decency is escaping this forum and being replaced with outrageousness. Its seems more and more like people are posting for "shock value" over giving legitimate opinions or making a good argument...
What do you think? Would you like to see Chat be more about civilized conversation and exchanging of opinions with a humorous edge? Or do you like the fact members are allowed to "shock" us with their outrageousness and entertain us with their insults?
Please discuss...
but IMO if you start too much censorship you're going to smother it and the community will stop working. You say "peer-reviewed," I say "cut-and-paste."redguru said:Then deleting posts that provide peer-reviewed research contradicting claims by the said sponsor.
KillahBee said:BRR, judging by the behavior of some of your chosen "leaders" round these parts, me thinks you might want to clean your house before worrying about ours.
Just my .02.
Could you tell me of a post or thread where this has been done. If your going to make a claim please back it up.redguru said:Then deleting posts that provide peer-reviewed research contradicting claims by the said sponsor.
the_clockwork said:the way the board is now is the reason I'm not plat..
too much BS with biased mods.. there needs to be printed rules and thats all that is enforced. there's no way in hell to keep this board undercontrol with people coming to it. It will be extremely boring (more than now) and customers will leave real fast!
digger said:You say "peer-reviewed," I say "cut-and-paste."
When you have another board out there actively bribing people to come here and make trouble, well, there's not much point in pretending that's a real discussion. Personally, I was hoping to keep it right where it was, and let Primordial respond to it at length... because if Macro had a failing, it was refusing to let the other side present their case. I was sorry to see that thread recycled. But I also don't routinely overrule the A-board mods.
That's the A-board, though, not Chat. Let's get back on topic, please.
Back in WWII, a lot of country bumpkins got introduced to hygiene quickly, courtesy of the US Army. Looks like Elite is filling that role now. Wouldn't be so bad if they didn't get stuck in Chat and would just move on to our "medical issues" or "style and grooming" boards.
Sometimes I think we provide a valuable public service by providing reassurance to those of you who are unsure about what's "normal" or were never taught how to use indoor plumbing with confidence.
Other times I think that's just asking too much of our mods. Let's face it, the supply of patient teachers who are willing to mentor adults on the proper use of toilet paper is limited.
About "put all rules in writing" -- nope. That way lies madness. I sympathize if you are sincere about wanting to know where you stand, but there are others (most of you know who they are) who will pounce on anything that claims to be a comprehensive list and go wild finding loopholes to exploit. I'm not about to play into their hands. "We reserve the right to serve refuse to anyone" and that's how it's going to stay.
stilleto said:I'm not sure which mod you think is biased (since we know it's not me or my alter), but if you think he has some ulterior motive when he gives advice- then don't listen to those posts.
a set of rules is difficult, as digger said, because it means that the people who need them, will also try to find loopholes in them.
Most people don't really need a set of rules to follow- they know common decency and if they step outside the unspoken set of rules once in a blue moon, it's not so bad as the guy who is constantly looking to do it just because he can.
needtogetaas said:Could you tell me of a post or thread where this has been done. If your going to make a claim please back it up.![]()
stilleto said:I'm not sure which mod you think is biased (since we know it's not me or my alter), but if you think he has some ulterior motive when he gives advice- then don't listen to those posts.
a set of rules is difficult, as digger said, because it means that the people who need them, will also try to find loopholes in them.
Most people don't really need a set of rules to follow- they know common decency and if they step outside the unspoken set of rules once in a blue moon, it's not so bad as the guy who is constantly looking to do it just because he can.
ceo said:He can't...they were all deleted! Didn't you read his post?!?!? lololoolll
The_Alcatraz said:Lots of racist comments....I've been on there a few times and almost every mod made me feel like this is an arab-hate forum..
jnevin said:And LMAO @ BM trying to sneak her life's struggle into it too. I fucking love it.
The_Alcatraz said:Lots of racist comments....I've been on there a few times and almost every mod made me feel like this is an arab-hate forum....i'll just stick to the serious forums on here...
jnevin said:And LMAO @ BM trying to sneak her life's struggle into it too. I fucking love it.
jnevin said:And LMAO @ BM trying to sneak her life's struggle into it too. I fucking love it.
stilleto said:
kano said:hey borris suck this
jnevin said:And LMAO @ BM trying to sneak her life's struggle into it too. I fucking love it.
FriendlyCanadian said:lololol yeah.. and trying to get Jh1 going at it with her.. awesome..
but stilleto pwned her.. and she hasn't been here in like 14 pages..
you guys should just let still run elite, that way things like C and C would stay the same..
seriously to fuck with all this censorship..
it's like you're trying to get the most articulate proper english majors or some shit in your C and C forum..
well that just isn't going to fucking happen..
so stop being a bunch of thumb sucking nancy mods and grow some thicker skin, and let people enjoy C and C the way they used too..
they way they all say it was when it was better..
BECAUSE obviously (well it should be obvious) if it isn't EF is in trouble more so due to management then anything else..
it should be obvious that all these stupid censorships and trying to OVER modify everything is only causing people to hate this certain area of the board and others to leave.. -.-
digger said:You say "peer-reviewed," I say "cut-and-paste."
When you have another board out there actively bribing people to come here and make trouble, well, there's not much point in pretending that's a real discussion. Personally, I was hoping to keep it right where it was, and let Primordial respond to it at length... because if Macro had a failing, it was refusing to let the other side present their case. I was sorry to see that thread recycled. But I also don't routinely overrule the A-board mods.
redguru said:Even if it was cut&pasted from another board (who's motivation may be suspect), the point of the study is still valid. It contradicted PP's claims and I would have liked to have seen his response rather than have it quickly recycled. PP's a smart guy and I am sure he could have come up with a well-reasoned response to the claim. By sweeping it under the rug it smacks of favoritism. Which is something one of the mods was cautioned about before he accepted the position.
KillahBee said:dude!!!
lose the pasty average chicks (oh wow great, big tits, never seen those before) and bring back the tremendously bonerific sweaty stomach abs hot makemegoo fitness poobah
giggity
I have no fucking ideaLuluDeren said:The ironic thing is posts made simply for shock value land far from their intention (to highlight how 'edgy' the originator is)....Sergei Eisenstein was edgy....Rothko was edgy...James Joyce was edgy. C&C...not so much![]()
FriendlyCanadian said:lololol yeah.. and trying to get Jh1 going at it with her.. awesome..
but stilleto pwned her.. and she hasn't been here in like 14 pages..
hanselthecaretaker said:We should have a thread rating button. Any thread that falls below a certain level automatically gets locked.
redguru said:That would have the effect of putting pick3 and sugarlicious in coventry.
borris said:lol, i've just figured out that this whole discussion was based upon the 2girls1cup vid
jnevin said:link?
2names1grinchBIKINIMOM said:Your avatar is pretty funny.![]()
For the record I was not the mod that got rid of that thread. So I guess you will have to try again. If for any reason I think I might be biased I step back and leave things up to other mods and admen. So sorry You need to try again.redguru said:Even if it was cut&pasted from another board (who's motivation may be suspect), the point of the study is still valid. It contradicted PP's claims and I would have liked to have seen his response rather than have it quickly recycled. PP's a smart guy and I am sure he could have come up with a well-reasoned response to the claim. By sweeping it under the rug it smacks of favoritism. Which is something one of the mods was cautioned about before he accepted the position.
digger said:You say "peer-reviewed," I say "cut-and-paste."
When you have another board out there actively bribing people to come here and make trouble, well, there's not much point in pretending that's a real discussion. Personally, I was hoping to keep it right where it was, and let Primordial respond to it at length... because if Macro had a failing, it was refusing to let the other side present their case. I was sorry to see that thread recycled. But I also don't routinely overrule the A-board mods.
That's the A-board, though, not Chat. Let's get back on topic, please.
Back in WWII, a lot of country bumpkins got introduced to hygiene quickly, courtesy of the US Army. Looks like Elite is filling that role now. Wouldn't be so bad if they didn't get stuck in Chat and would just move on to our "medical issues" or "style and grooming" boards.
Sometimes I think we provide a valuable public service by providing reassurance to those of you who are unsure about what's "normal" or were never taught how to use indoor plumbing with confidence.
Other times I think that's just asking too much of our mods. Let's face it, the supply of patient teachers who are willing to mentor adults on the proper use of toilet paper is limited.
About "put all rules in writing" -- nope. That way lies madness. I sympathize if you are sincere about wanting to know where you stand, but there are others (most of you know who they are) who will pounce on anything that claims to be a comprehensive list and go wild finding loopholes to exploit. I'm not about to play into their hands. "We reserve the right to serve refuse to anyone" and that's how it's going to stay.
needtogetaas said:For the record I was not the mod that got rid of that thread. So I guess you will have to try again. If for any reason I think I might be biased I step back and leave things up to other mods and admen. So sorry You need to try again.
The thread was in the sups forum. I have no power there. OOOPs now who looks like the accusing asshole trouble maker.
Yes you were. My apologies on that one. But you are trying to attack my character. I did nothing shady and hide nothing from any one. 3 mods and 2 admen were made well aware of that thread. You have hated me long before I became a mod and I did nothing to you before that. I am well aware that you and a few other c&c members would love to be able to point the finger at me. Thats why I often ask The other mods and admen for guidance on how to handle things. You take one thread and try to pin it on me. Thats not cool, its not right, and it clearly shows your feeling of intense hostility towards me. Rather then your actual concern for the subject at hand.redguru said:it was moved to the sups forum from the roid forum, then recycled. and fuck you for the asshole comment, I was being civil.
what about suzanne summers? i bet she is/was a freakSpartacus said:do you think in her prime sally fields was good in bed?
redguru said:Whether it was you or not is moot, needto. My objection still remains the same. If posts critical of sponsors' products are recycled then it smacks of favoritism no matter which mod or admin does it. I for one, have nothing against dermacrine sustain or any of PP's products.
redguru said:Whether it was you or not is moot, needto. My objection still remains the same. If posts critical of sponsors' products are recycled then it smacks of favoritism no matter which mod or admin does it. I for one, have nothing against dermacrine sustain or any of PP's products.
redguru said:Even if it was cut&pasted from another board (who's motivation may be suspect), the point of the study is still valid. It contradicted PP's claims and I would have liked to have seen his response rather than have it quickly recycled. PP's a smart guy and I am sure he could have come up with a well-reasoned response to the claim. By sweeping it under the rug it smacks of favoritism. Which is something one of the mods was cautioned about before he accepted the position.
patsfan1379 said:I'd say mods hawking sponsors products is pretty biased. LOL.
_________________________________________________________________redguru said:Then deleting posts that provide peer-reviewed research contradicting claims by the said sponsor.
needtogetaas said:_________________________________________________________________
Your response
_________________________________________________________________
hmmmm Just a bit of backpedaling I see. Ill give you that it might have been one of your objections but it was clearly not you or some other members only objection. I simple "I am sorry needto" will do bro you don't have to grovel. I don't expect any such behaver from you though. I'll just say this. Get your game together better next time. I work hard at every thing I do. I work hard to be a good mod,a good sponsor rep, a good member, and a good friend/helper to every member I can.I do my best to seperate each role I have here on ef I may not be perfect but I give it my all. I have lots to learn but I am willing and able to do so. So please stop attacking me. I don't do it to you.
You call that an attack lol. Bro I was talking about the computerKnock It Off said:So why did you do it to me in this thread with no explanation? Who did I bail on and how?
http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/c...chitt_lick_my_balls_i_owned_you-574899-6.html
right.Well, I thought so until I saw that. I also I thought I was pretty clear as to my reasons why.needtogetaas said:You call that an attack lol. Bro I was talking about the computerI am sorry I never got back to your k msg about that it was like 1am I went to bed. You of all people should know I am your friend.
right.
Knock It Off said:So why did you do it to me in this thread with no explanation? Who did I bail on and how?
http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/c...chitt_lick_my_balls_i_owned_you-574899-6.html
I am sorry bro. It was 2am. I was not trying to take a big jab at you. I understand whats going one. Please forgive me. some times my taste in jokes are not all that tasteful. I am working on it.Knock It Off said:Well, I thought so until I saw that. I also I thought I was pretty clear as to my reasons why.
When I clearly explain myself for certain actions and someone either doesn't believe me, or doesn't take my word for it and turns around and takes a jab at me...
I don't dig it.

I'm not even pissed off about it really, I was just like "wtf"?needtogetaas said:I am sorry bro. It was 2am. I was not trying to take a big jab at you. I understand whats going one. Please forgive me. some times my taste in jokes are not all that tasteful. I am working on it.![]()
![]()
I knew you were at the time. I got your k msg but passed the hell out. I don't know what the hell I was doing up that late any way. 2am and we were almost the only ones left posting. I was thinking I would get to it in the morning but then got busy and forgot.Knock It Off said:I'm not even pissed off about it really, I was just like "wtf"?
jnevin said:I think politics/ humor/ shock are all good.
I think that when every thread or comment is mo/ or gay shit for the sake of just saying something gay it gets stupid and genuinely takes away from the site. A gay rights or whatever thread can be interesting. All those other dumb fucking ones are a waste.
jh1 said:I think what you are refering to is the:
"I'm Gay"
"You're Gay"
"I want you in my mouth"
"OH yeah baby, I am so gay for you"
Type stuff?
That stuff gets repeated all day everyday by quite a few members. I say it someitmes too, although rarely - mostly just to egg them on. I might say other meaningless drivell that others don't like - I am not sure.
What diff does it make? I just ignore the posts threads that don't interest me. I made some posts in here that you didn't like - I was making a point.
Just ignore it if you don't like it. I mean if someone is instigating a race riot or they are running off your targeted advertising demographic - then yeah, you gotta do something about - but short of that - who cares.
Seems to me you will just run off more members by decided what they shold and should not talk about. Just let the posters of the forum decide for themselves what they want to talk about - no matter how juvinile.
errn247 said:So its decided NO GAYS in C&C.
Sorry puddle monkey
velvett said:![]()
So, is it safe to say that the majority likes chat as is and most of the mods can go fall off the nearest cliff?
![]()
velvett said:![]()
So, is it safe to say that the majority likes chat as is and most of the mods can go fall off the nearest cliff?
![]()
AAP said:Well I have that penciled in my hate book for March.
This page contains mature content. By continuing, you confirm you are over 18 and agree to our TOS and User Agreement.
Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 










