Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 
Im about to start test/anavar and i cant wait. 15-20lbs solid muscle, wow. Forget getting 40+ lbs andlooking like the michelin man, its all about getting the girls with a nice anavar body
Why I like anavar
- Thread starter ManOfArms
- Start date
Selfcentor
New member
Did that cycle a year ago with good results.
you think 500mg test/40mg var is too much test to cut up? Im running 4-5x a week
ManOfArms
New member
I hope that is all she likes playing with cause after wk 4 on Anavar, my dick is toast unless I add some Test in (did without Test once and learned the hard way).
Other then strength and hardness from var no other side affects here. Never had any problems with sex drive either, not everyone reacts the same I guess.
For the person asking about PCT. What I recommend, when on, is liver detox, back in the day I loaded up on Liver Detox from the EF store. Not sure if they are still around.
For PCT, .5 ldex every other day, just to be in the safe side.
mr.nitro
Banned
nothing unreal exisits
There are three words, rather simple words at that. At first glance it seems a simple obvious statement. There is a lot behind them.
Nothing: The complete lack of 'something'. The empty set isn't even nothing, for it is a set. Nothing is the complete lack of anything.
Unreal: Webster has three definitions for unreal:
Not real or actual;
imaginary; fanciful; illusory; [fantastic.
lacking truth; not genuine; false; artificial.
Exists: What is existence and non-existence? Plato held that Forms existed, and much of his philosophy revolves around the form of Justice. To Plato, these forms were real. Draw a circle. This is not a real circle, there are imperfections in it; not all points are equally distant from the center. Yet, when I say 'circle' you know what I mean even though there can be no such thing on earth. What common thing do you and I access when we talk of circles, triangles, shapes, numbers?
Plato held that these were forms and during certain parts of our life we had perfect access to these concepts and remember them. Webster defines 'exists' as "To have actual being; to have life or animation; to continue to be". One example that is given is 'Belief in magic still exists'; thus something as insubstantial as a belief in one person constitutes existence.
So, how could we prove that nothing unreal exists, show that the inverse of the sentence is not consistent. Logically, one would write 'Nothing unreal exists' as ~Ex(~Rx & Xx). There is not something that is not real and exists. So, the inverse of this would be Ex(~Rx & Xx) which translates to 'There is something that is not real and exists'.
Is there anything that is 'unreal' that exists? Lets take several things that potentially exist, and consider if they are 'unreal'.
Beauty
Justice
a Circle
Good
Love
Do these things exist? Yes.
Are any of them considered to be unreal?
That is the crux of the matter.
There are three words, rather simple words at that. At first glance it seems a simple obvious statement. There is a lot behind them.
Nothing: The complete lack of 'something'. The empty set isn't even nothing, for it is a set. Nothing is the complete lack of anything.
Unreal: Webster has three definitions for unreal:
Not real or actual;
imaginary; fanciful; illusory; [fantastic.
lacking truth; not genuine; false; artificial.
Exists: What is existence and non-existence? Plato held that Forms existed, and much of his philosophy revolves around the form of Justice. To Plato, these forms were real. Draw a circle. This is not a real circle, there are imperfections in it; not all points are equally distant from the center. Yet, when I say 'circle' you know what I mean even though there can be no such thing on earth. What common thing do you and I access when we talk of circles, triangles, shapes, numbers?
Plato held that these were forms and during certain parts of our life we had perfect access to these concepts and remember them. Webster defines 'exists' as "To have actual being; to have life or animation; to continue to be". One example that is given is 'Belief in magic still exists'; thus something as insubstantial as a belief in one person constitutes existence.
So, how could we prove that nothing unreal exists, show that the inverse of the sentence is not consistent. Logically, one would write 'Nothing unreal exists' as ~Ex(~Rx & Xx). There is not something that is not real and exists. So, the inverse of this would be Ex(~Rx & Xx) which translates to 'There is something that is not real and exists'.
Is there anything that is 'unreal' that exists? Lets take several things that potentially exist, and consider if they are 'unreal'.
Beauty
Justice
a Circle
Good
Love
Do these things exist? Yes.
Are any of them considered to be unreal?
That is the crux of the matter.
needtogetaas
New member
technically, mg for mg it is 6 times as anabolic as test, doesnt really convert to estrogen very much, produces clean gains with no water retention...but the strength gains are not THAT impressive IMO.
What about the gains you get in your physique (if one is going for a more shredded look)
The one time I ran var (with test/tren) I got leaner and harder than I've ever been. Ran 60 mg's a day for 6 weeks. (per Traz)
