I am constantly fascinated by people's willingness to beleive that a man who walked the earth 2000 yrs ago was the creator of all that is was and ever will be.......all because a little book that has been written and rewritten hundreds of times, say's so. There is a historical account of a man named Jesus who caused some commotion around the time that the bible say's he walked the earth......but past that there is no mention of him being able to do things that were attributed to him in the bible. I think if a man was able to really do the things that Jesus supposedly was able to do, he would have attracted more attention from historians and writers of that time. He probably did though, but we all know a couple hundred years after his death there was a massive hunt for any and all literature related to him, and they were subsequently burned. Only a few works that "vaguely" mention him survived. If I'm not mistaken was it not King Saul who was repsonsible?? Anyway, I also find it amusing how his look has changed throughout the years. Some say they don't care what he looked like, but it just goes to further discredit his historical account when people change his look to a particular region. You'd think that people wouldn't mess with god's look. I mean, if I was god and I came to earth looking a certain way.....I'd be kind of pissed if people kept fucking with my image. This is the way I presented myself, so quit fucking it around damnit!!
Oh well, I still beleive in god.....I just don't have the arrogance to assume that
A. I am made in "it's" image
B. "It" would deem it appropriate to manifest itself to us.