Where's Nelson's "training tip" thread?

[EngiCream]

this type of shit is happening more and more lately....hopefully the 'house cleaning' will fix that problem soon.

 

[galaxy]

Why would George even allow his mods to have Chemical Muscle in there signatures?

 

[gab9681]

Alright, what's going on here. I thought yesterday was scarey, but now......Fonz and Nelson somewhat getting along? Something is up. Heh heh heh.....

It wasn't me. The thread was fine.

Fonz

 

[DaddyX]

that is bullshit it was deleted. Nelson said nothing wrong in the thread.

 

[Riker29]

Yeah, this is ridiculous. Someone is deleting a BUNCH of stuff.

This is another reason why - as I said yesterday - Mods should not only be selected based upon knowledge, but their disposition. They should not be selected based on post count (these people with like 3000 posts in 6 months, thats almost sad - get a life!), not just on how much they know, but what KIND of guy are they?

Do they keep a level head, don't get pissed or create drama, don't create controversy?

THAT is an important criteria.

Some of the current (well, soon-to-not-be) Mods fail that test.

And at least 1 name mentioned in the "nominations" yesterday doesnt either (in my opinion).

 

[jonny jacked]

Yeah, this is ridiculous. Someone is deleting a BUNCH of stuff.

This is another reason why - as I said yesterday - Mods should not only be selected based upon knowledge, but their disposition. They should not be selected based on post count (these people with like 3000 posts in 6 months, thats almost sad - get a life!), not just on how much they know, but what KIND of guy are they?

Do they keep a level head, don't get pissed or create drama, don't create controversy?

THAT is an important criteria.

Some of the current (well, soon-to-not-be) Mods fail that test.

And at least 1 name mentioned in the "nominations" yesterday doesnt either (in my opinion).

well said.

 

[Anakin]

All of this is bullshit.

Anyways, going back to the training tip thread, is there a reason why you recommend limiting the range of motion on the incline curls instead of getting the full stretch?

Conventional wisdom in every bb book says that the whole purpose of doing incline curls is to get the stretch, so I'm just curious.

 

[nadr7891]

It wasn't me. The thread was fine.

Fonz

i know Fonz, i was just yanking yo chain.

Nadr

 

[Nelson Montana]

All of this is bullshit.

Anyways, going back to the training tip thread, is there a reason why you recommend limiting the range of motion on the incline curls instead of getting the full stretch?

Conventional wisdom in every bb book says that the whole purpose of doing incline curls is to get the stretch, so I'm just curious.

I answered this in the deleted post, but here goes again...

For one thing, not straightening the arm keeps constant tension on the bicep. Also, once the arm is relaxed, in order to bend again, the brachaialous must come into play, that fatiques the arm before the bicep is exausted, defeating the purpose.


Yeah, Fonz and I may not agree often but I'd like to think we can share cyberspace without wanting to tear into each other every day. After all that's gone down, I think we all need to concentrate on keeping a level head. And yes, I agree that a mod should be chosen for his demeaner and maturity, not his post count or his cycle dosages.

 

[MR Pink]

Nelson do you think all biceps exercises should be done this way....that is without fully streching the arm?