I'm not sure what you're saying.Kane Fan said:the problem with your comparison is this
a strike specialist vs a ground specialist isn't any proof at all of striker vs grappler
it dosn't test that
it tests the grapplers take downs and the strikers take down defence
that's the problem with the comparison
Originally, I was speaking about the one-dimensional approach taken by many of the newer fighters I've seen. If a guy has 8 or 9 fights under his belt and all he does is one thing, that shows a lack of appreciation for the versatility of MMA.
That being said, guys who have been labeled only as strikers tend to throw punches until their opponent is knocked out or down (then GnP'd).
The same fighter eventually faces a former wrestler or practicioner of some other ground-based sport, who is willing to eat a few punches in order to take the guy's legs out.
A strike specialist vs a ground specialist shows exactly that.
But if the striker has good enough takedown defense to stop a veteran wrestler, then he's really not a one-dimensional standup fighter, since takedown defense isn't a part of boxing.
I was not comparing that type of guy.