Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

The true benefit of HGH?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Juice Authority
  • Start date Start date
Laser0001 said:
What was your experience with it Nelson?

I would think Nelson would be an advocate since he's an old man with low IFG-1 levels. :D
 
I am a 56 yr old man and been using gh for 10 yrs.I have good energy and dont look 56 acording to most peopel I meet. I have been buying from bestbuyhgh.com and am very happy with gh and wouldn't do without it.
 
Hey, if GH was all it was cracked up to be, I'd be on board. I can get it at a good price. (No, don't even bother asking). But besides the fact that it didn't do much in terms of muscle or at loss and that it had a bad effect on my blood sugar levels, Gh is unique in the fact that it is the SECRETION of the hormone that actually imparts much of its benifits. This is why resistance exercise and deep sleep are so vital to maintaining "youthfulness." Not to mention (and so many people do) GH is directly related to the prolifration of cancer cells. Of course, when you're 25 that means nothing. You just assume that concerns people who already have a propensity toward it and no one ever thinks it'll happen to them.

200 bucks a month for minimal effects, carpel tunnel, hypoglycemia and the risk of cancer? Fuck that.
 
Nelson Montana said:
Hey, if GH was all it was cracked up to be, I'd be on board. I can get it at a good price. (No, don't even bother asking). But besides the fact that it didn't do much in terms of muscle or at loss and that it had a bad effect on my blood sugar levels, Gh is unique in the fact that it is the SECRETION of the hormone that actually imparts much of its benifits. This is why resistance exercise and deep sleep are so vital to maintaining "youthfulness." Not to mention (and so many people do) GH is directly related to the prolifration of cancer cells. Of course, when you're 25 that means nothing. You just assume that concerns people who already have a propensity toward it and no one ever thinks it'll happen to them.

200 bucks a month for minimal effects, carpel tunnel, hypoglycemia and the risk of cancer? Fuck that.

Nice Nelson.
 
Is there a study showing exogenous rHGH directly causing cancer? If so, I would like to read it. I do understand that it hastens the spread of cancer. To expound on this further, HGH effects are primarily mediated through increased endogenous IGF-1, and since IGF-1 causes hyperplasia; if cancer cells are present would act as a cancer cell "fertilizer". This would be bad, but if cancer cells are not present, the hope is that IGF-1 would cause muscle cell hyperplasia. This is primarily why bodybuilders take rHGH and more recently exogenous IGF-1.
 
I have been on GH for 9 months (Jino. at 4 to 6ius) now and I am not that impressed-not enough to continue or try it again. I have experienced better skin tone, leaning out, and a better attitude, but nothing extrodinary.
The reason I tried it is its ability to increase muscle fiber, but for that to happen I have read it takes over 8 months and at that length of time the sides would not be worth it-even though I have not experienced any noticable sides like carpel tunnel, hypoglycemia, but that is not to say I have not stimulated any cancer cells, which makes me nervous as hell to read about.
As Nelson states: its the most over rated drug on the market-I agree, but I wanted to try it for myself and now that I have my opinion is well stated above.
 
Anti-GH over here. One year + Sht load of money + Consistently trying to change things up thinking it was my fault + Annoying SUBQ injects = Babysoft skin and better nights of sleep. THATS IT!!!!...But to each there zone, some people claim they can't do a cycle without it.
 
Top Bottom