Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

roids is roids

Anyone who thinks that it would be difficult to tell the difference between 50mg of Dbol and 100mg Anadrol- really needs to re- think the use of anabolic steroids.


That is an understatement, Let's make an analogy....Let's say you have a stock mustang, that would be D-bol...then you put a supercharger and sport headers on that mustang, they are both similar but one has a HELL of a lot more horsepower.........
 
Yeah, jump on the mods stick buddy. You really think if you blindfolded a guy and
told him you were going to give him either 50 mg d-bol or 100mg anadrol he could
tell you which he was given after a week or two? He'd guess right slightly more than
50 percent of the time. That's the whole point. I can tell you only read the short
posts. How about reading the long post and if you think I'm full of shit I'll post
the whole article.
 
I guess I'm really talking about more about the article which talks about using
A-50 for dieting as well as other articles which somewhat dismiss the idea of
"cutting" cycles for the average Joe. Of course nobody has ever been blindfolded
and given d-bol. But I'm sure I can dig up many additional things to prove my point.
I guarantee that I will be posting articles as soon as I go home and find them.
However, if I posted an article by Jesus Christ himself someone would say, yeah
he was a great man but he was wrong about growth hormone. Like people
on here say about Duchaine.
 
First off don't tell me I'm jumping on anybody's "stick" DICKHEAD. Mod or not, I will disagree with anyone who I think has misinformation.

Secondly, maybe a novice who has not done cycles of Anadrol or D-bol at least 2 times each would not know, but almost anyone who has, would know what they were taking by the first day or two. And it doesn't matter if I read the short post, the long post, the long short long post, you keep babbling the same thing over and over again, trying to make a new more idiotic point each time?

if I posted an article by Jesus Christ himself someone would say, yeah he was a great man but he was wrong about growth hormone

Probably because you come off like a know it all prick and people are compelled to prove you wrong? Maybe?? just a thought of mine........WHAT'S NEXT??:bawling:
 
You sound like a ten year old you little pissant.
If I have misinformation you show me just one source asshole. Just
fucking one. You list one article, one interview, one study, one magazine,
one anything. Until then don't think you know shit because you read
a message board. Read every magazine and every new piece of information
concerning steroids for 4 years like I have and then tell me I'm wrong.
Why don't you read articles by Dharkham, Duchaine, Borreson, LLewellyn, and
the guys on anabolicextreme and then come back and tell ME some new things.
 
actually you could do that test on me and I could easily tell what oral I am taking between d-bol and anadrol, piece of cake. Nothing blows me up like anadrol, and d-bol takes sometime for me, so that would be an easy one. Not a flame just a fact.
 
You mention Christ yet you failed to add the fact did he use a simple cycle or a more advanced one? New ideas, if thats what you are looking for why do you worship without question Duchaine, who fucked up a lot. You sound like a simple minded little moron. Read all the magazines. WTF is with that? I learn more in a month from this board than I could learn in years from the mags. Grow up and heed those with real world experience, shithead.
 
Top Bottom