Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Oh, I'm sorry. I didn't get a chance to respond

Status
Not open for further replies.
Smurfy said:
lmao @ the judging that goes on here. hilarious.

glass houses, people. glass houses.

also I dont think her boobies were nude. they were wet through lol

Hold me, I'm hurt. I fear I will never love again.
:worried:
 
SublimeZM said:
was there nipple showing? was the natural saggage or shape shown or was it restricted by cloth?

if it would hurt the fellas feelings then why did u do it

you should want your body to be sacred and only for your man

Yeah, how risque are we talking here?

My take on girls who do stuff like that, personally, is either just sex or just friends. I have nothing against it but from my own experiences I don't want to deal with it. I don't want to be in a relationship with someone who is looking to be thought of that sexually. Anything you would see in a fitness magazine is perfectly fine and clearly gets the message that you're in shape or whatever across. No need to whip out tits, ass or junk for the camera IMO. It's a little strange if you aren't being paid for it. I can see maybe wanting a pic of someone you've slept with to look at down the road and be all hot dayum but again, that would be a sexual thing for me I think. I can't see myself holding onto nude pics of a serious gf to look at later in life to remember them in that way. I'd like to think we'd have more to remember.
 
Nathan said:
Yeah, how risque are we talking here?

My take on girls who do stuff like that, personally, is either just sex or just friends. I have nothing against it but from my own experiences I don't want to deal with it. I don't want to be in a relationship with someone who is looking to be thought of that sexually. Anything you would see in a fitness magazine is perfectly fine and clearly gets the message that you're in shape or whatever across. No need to whip out tits, ass or junk for the camera IMO. It's a little strange if you aren't being paid for it. I can see maybe wanting a pic of someone you've slept with to look at down the road and be all hot dayum but again, that would be a sexual thing for me I think. I can't see myself holding onto nude pics of a serious gf to look at later in life to remember them in that way. I'd like to think we'd have more to remember.

WIll you hold me Nathan?
 
SublimeZM said:
was there nipple showing? was the natural saggage or shape shown or was it restricted by cloth?

if it would hurt the fellas feelings then why did u do it

you should want your body to be sacred and only for your man
1. they were covered with fabric. 2. They aren't saggy because they are fake....lol. 3. Mistake/wouldn't do it again as already stated...blah blah blah. Personally, I like nudes and sexy photos. I think there should be more here, not less. =-)
 
HeatherRae said:
1. they were covered with fabric. 2. They aren't saggy because they are fake....lol. 3. Mistake/wouldn't do it again as already stated...blah blah blah. Personally, I like nudes and sexy photos. I think there should be more here, not less. =-)

Heather will hold me. She's sweet.
 
Smurfy said:
i wonder how many people here who have significant others tell the SO everything they post here?? I'd guess not many.
i hope you recognize the difference between innocently using EF as a sanctuary and escape from people they know in real life, and using EF as a method of going behind a significant other's back to engage in acts of betrayal and infedelity
 
Nathan said:
Yeah, how risque are we talking here?

My take on girls who do stuff like that, personally, is either just sex or just friends. I have nothing against it but from my own experiences I don't want to deal with it. I don't want to be in a relationship with someone who is looking to be thought of that sexually. Anything you would see in a fitness magazine is perfectly fine and clearly gets the message that you're in shape or whatever across. No need to whip out tits, ass or junk for the camera IMO. It's a little strange if you aren't being paid for it. I can see maybe wanting a pic of someone you've slept with to look at down the road and be all hot dayum but again, that would be a sexual thing for me I think. I can't see myself holding onto nude pics of a serious gf to look at later in life to remember them in that way. I'd like to think we'd have more to remember.
good post bro, i agree
 
SublimeZM said:
i hope you recognize the difference between innocently using EF as a sanctuary and escape from people they know in real life, and using EF as a method of going behind a significant other's back to engage in acts of betrayal and infedelity
I hope you know the definition of infidelity. and I agree. but I think you're over-judging this particular situation - especially when you didnt see the photos.
 
HeatherRae said:
1. they were covered with fabric. 2. They aren't saggy because they are fake....lol. 3. Mistake/wouldn't do it again as already stated...blah blah blah. Personally, I like nudes and sexy photos. I think there should be more here, not less. =-)
does your husband have any idea the things your posting here? (in terms of serious sexual comments direct at other male members, and the "mistake" pics)?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom