Names of UGLs that have been busted or closed shop in the last 2 months.

[Pat_McCrotch]

Schedule III
Amobarbital & noncontrolled active ingred. 2126 N Amobarbital/ephedrine capsules
Amobarbital suppository dosage form 2126 N
Anabolic steroids 4000 N "Body Building" drugs
Aprobarbital 2100 N Alurate
Barbituric acid derivative 2100 N Barbiturates not specifically listed
Benzphetamine 1228 N Didrex, Inapetyl
Boldenone 4000 N Equipoise, Parenabol, Vebonol, dehydrotestosterone
Buprenorphine 9064 Buprenex, Temgesic
Butabarbital 2100 N Butisol, Butibel
Butalbital 2100 N Fiorinal, Butalbital with aspirin
Chlorhexadol 2510 N Mechloral, Mecoral, Medodorm, Chloralodol
Chlorotestosterone (same as clostebol) 4000 N if 4-chlorotestosterone then clostebol
Chlorphentermine 1645 N Pre-Sate, Lucofen, Apsedon, Desopimon
Clortermine 1647 N Voranil
Clostebol 4000 N Alfa-Trofodermin, Clostene, 4-chlorotestosterone
Codeine & isoquinoline alkaloid 90 mg/du 9803 Codeine with papaverine or noscapine
Codeine combination product 90 mg/du 9804 Empirin, Fiorinal, Tylenol, ASA or APAP w/codeine
Dehydrochlormethyltestosterone 4000 N Oral-Turinabol
Dihydrocodeine combination product 90 mg/du 9807 Synalgos-DC, Compal
Dihydrotestosterone (same as stanolone) 4000 N see stanolone
Dronabinol in sesame oil in soft gelatin capsule 7369 N Marinol, synthetic THC in sesame oil/soft gelatin
Drostanolone 4000 N Drolban, Masterid, Permastril
Ethylestrenol 4000 N Maxibolin, Orabolin, Durabolin-O, Duraboral
Ethylmorphine combination product 15 mg/du 9808
Fluoxymesterone 4000 N Anadroid-F, Halotestin, Ora-Testryl
Formebolone (incorrect spelling in law) 4000 N Esiclene, Hubernol
Hydrocodone & isoquinoline alkaloid 15 mg/du 9805 Dihydrocodeinone+papaverine or noscapine
Hydrocodone combination product 15 mg/du 9806 Tussionex, Tussend, Lortab, Vicodin, Hycodan, Anexsia ++
Ketamine 7285 N Ketaset, Ketalar, Special K, K
Lysergic acid 7300 N LSD precursor
Lysergic acid amide 7310 N LSD precursor
Mesterolone 4000 N Proviron
Methandienone (see Methandrostenolone) 4000 N
Methandranone 4000 N ?incorrect spelling of methandienone?
Methandriol 4000 N Sinesex, Stenediol, Troformone
Methandrostenolone 4000 N Dianabol, Metabolina, Nerobol, Perbolin
Methenolone 4000 N Primobolan, Primobolan Depot, Primobolan S
Methyltestosterone 4000 N Android, Oreton, Testred, Virilon
Methyprylon 2575 N Noludar
Mibolerone 4000 N Cheque
Morphine combination product/50 mg/100 ml or gm 9810
Nalorphine 9400 Nalline
Nandrolone 4000 N Deca-Durabolin - nandrolone decanoate - -Durabolin, Durabolin, Durabolin-50
Norethandrolone 4000 N Nilevar, Solevar
Opium combination product 25 mg/du 9809 Paregoric, other combination products
Oxandrolone 4000 N Anavar, Lonavar, Provitar, Vasorome
Oxymesterone 4000 N Anamidol, Balnimax, Oranabol, Oranabol 10
Oxymetholone 4000 N Anadrol-50, Adroyd, Anapolon, Anasteron, Pardroyd
Pentobarbital & noncontrolled active ingred. 2271 N FP-3
Pentobarbital suppository dosage form 2271 N WANS
Phendimetrazine 1615 N Plegine, Prelu-2, Bontril, Melfiat, Statobex
Secobarbital & noncontrolled active ingred 2316 N various
Secobarbital suppository dosage form 2316 N various
Stanolone 4000 N Anabolex, Andractim, Pesomax, dihydrotestosterone
Stanozolol 4000 N Winstrol, Winstrol-V
Stimulant compounds previously excepted 1405 N Mediatric
Sulfondiethylmethane 2600 N
Sulfonethylmethane 2605 N
Sulfonmethane 2610 N
Talbutal 2100 N Lotusate
Testolactone 4000 N Teslac
Testosterone 4000 N Android-T, Androlan, Depotest, Delatestryl
Thiamylal 2100 N Surital
Thiopental 2100 N Pentothal
Tiletamine & Zolazepam Combination Product 7295 N Telazol
Trenbolone 4000 N Finaplix-S, Finajet, Parabolan
Vinbarbital 2100 N Delvinal, vinbarbitone

its almost funny how you left out eh first part of the section you just quoted:

`(A) The term `anabolic steroid' means any drug or hormonal substance, chemically and pharmacologically related to testosterone (other than estrogens, progestins, corticosteroids, and dehydroepiandrosterone), and includes--

this is right before all the shit you posted. it is funny how people have to be right sooooo bad that they give partial truths.

 

[holy ghost]

?? this thread is nuts

 

[gymratforlife]

PBL is snitching or LE is answering emails pretending to be him.Any one know what date he was busted on exactly?

 

[mookie]

PBL is snitching or LE is answering emails pretending to be him.Any one know what date he was busted on exactly?

The news reported it on Oct 1 so right around end of Sept.

 

[Harleymarleybone]

The states clearly what conspiracey is. So we cant find a case or somone cant find it but it does not change the fact that it is the law and if they wanted to pop you on it they could. Will they come after the little guy maybe maybe not. the probability is low right now. they most likly would not have said they have all the leads of the consumers if they planned on coming aftr us. by the ketting it out they have our info gives us time to clean house. if thy wanted they can get us on conspiracy because we asked for a list which isnt conspiracy yet but when you take the step to send moneu that is where intent can be proven in mosr any court of law.

Do you have a link to just one case where a mere user was indicted on conspiracy without possession? Just one. I have looked and can't find any, and nobody here has provided one. This tells me that the probability is microscopically low to nil, and that such cases are not prosecutable for all practical purposes.

 

[Harleymarleybone]

If LE was intent on going after end users to arrest them, wouldn't this have been the best oppertunity for them to do it??? Their case would be air tight. Every delivery could have been controlled.

Exactly. There is a lot of fear-mongering afoot.

 

[muffinmaker]

Do you have a link to just one case where a mere user was indicted on conspiracy without possession? Just one. I have looked and can't find any, and nobody here has provided one. This tells me that the probability is microscopically low to nil, and that such cases are not prosecutable for all practical purposes.

Why do you say this? Because it hasnt been done b4, it wont be done? Please dont be so naive. Theres is a first for eveything, just as the busts, there can be firsts for eveything. When did LE have so much info, NEVER.

 

[needtogetaas]

No, and here's why.

#1 BRR and George do not want any talk of sources on the board.

#2 How can anyone give you an honest answer to that? No one knows. LE took over some source accounts for months and still operated. Still answered emails and took orders. How do we know that isn't the case here? We don't. No one can honestly answer that.

It was reported 50+ labs were busted. So far, no one has produced evidence of even close to half that amount of being busted. The indictments and such that have been linked here don't even add up to 20, (or less if I am mistaken). So who are the others that was busted that we don't know about?

Is it really worth a chance to take a gamble and find out with your own safety at stake? Bro, save your money. Christmas is right around the corner. Treat your girl to something extra nice. In the long run, that is the better investment.

very well put bro..hell I dont want any thing to do with any of this shit for a long time now.

 

[Harleymarleybone]

Why do you say this? Because it hasnt been done b4, it wont be done? Please dont be so naive. Theres is a first for eveything, just as the busts, there can be firsts for eveything. When did LE have so much info, NEVER.

Yes, the fact that nobody can find any link to a case where a mere user was charged with conspiracy without possession, gives me a very good reason to think that the probability of such a thing happening in the future is next to nil.

Similarly the fact that I have never seen a pig fly gives me a very good reason to think the probability of a flying pig in the future is next to nil.

Sure a pig could fly in the future, but it's not something I need to seriously consider. Capice?

 

[Pat_McCrotch]

Do you have a link to just one case where a mere user was indicted on conspiracy without possession? Just one. I have looked and can't find any, and nobody here has provided one. This tells me that the probability is microscopically low to nil, and that such cases are not prosecutable for all practical purposes.

None of us are law gurus as you are not either. No one has said it has happenned. It can happen. Why are you arguing this? it is law. They can get you on it if they choose to. The keyowrd is if the choose to.