Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

how come native americans don't bitch as much as blacks do?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gambino
  • Start date Start date
gotmojo said:
You are absolutely right!

Foreign illness was it!

Like say for instance, blankets that were deliberately infested with smallpox and given to entire tribes for the sole purpose of wiping them out.

Infested blankets were indeed used during the Pontiac's War but it wasnt very common. In fact, natives in California used poison oak against spaniards way before. Germ warfare is old. During the middle age, catapults were used to throw plague corpses. Yes they were some incidents but most of the germ warfare was actually between whites.
 
BTW, I use a firefox filter to block the owned.jpg background image. Renders COTB bombs useless from my POV.
 
gotmojo said:
This is true, but the fact that a races immune system wasn't prepared for what was brought into their "world" is no excuse for the people that brought it there to exploit it for the purpose of genoside. Two totally different ends of the spectrum. Also I am sure the rats and fleas didn't select your people to be eliminated. They were just doing their rat and flea thing. There was a conscious decision made to do this to these people. Kind of like, "Hey, they seem to have a problem with this that or the other, so let's make sure they contract it. That way nobody has to actually pull a trigger.".

Nope, the plague was an act of bioterrorism.

http://www.nodoom.com/chapter15to16.html

The first recorded instance of biological warfare goes back to the 1300s. The Mongol army used catapults to hurl the bodies of plague victims over the walls into the city of Caffa in the Ukraine. The plague eventually spread from this city to Europe where it killed one third to one half of Europe’s population. The early New England colonists intentionally distributed blankets from people infected with smallpox to the Indians. The white man’s diseases, more than his technological edge, resulted in the decimation of the indigenous populations of the North and South American
continents.

You don't hear me flying off the handle at Mongolia though. The world was a far more evil place back in those days. My ancestors probably lived as serf slaves while they had to deal with bioterrorism in the form of the plague. Life was evil back then. It is far less evil now, but you can't find any group that wasn't the victim or perpetrator of evil in history. Even the Indians declared war on each other, took each other as slaves, stole each others stuff. The only difference is white people were better at it because we had better weapons.

 
redguru said:
I disagree wholeheartedly, your criteria is entirely subjective. The entire purpose of our existence is to evolve into a more viable species. The useful lifespan of most aboriginal groups remained stagnant for millenia. The American Indians had no changes in musical or decorative art and only a couple of tribes even had begun a written language. The Northern and Southwestern tribes that were less nomadic had no changes in architecture in the same period. Dress, cooking methodology and utensils and weaponry also unchanged. Religious pantheons remained the same except when tribes remained in contact with other tribes.
And I disagree with you. I see a species that is paving over and destroying, with chemicals, pollution, and wholesale destruction without regard the only home it has. At the rate things are going it will not be very pretty in a few hundred years. Between chemical pollution of the land/air/water, EMF pollution, and agricultural soil depletion, SOMETHING is going to give.

... and just because something doesn't change doesn't mean that it is without value! That mentality is why we stuff our old people into nursing homes instead of keeping them around and learning something from them.

Evolving into a more viable species has nothing to do with technological advancement, it has to do with spiritual growth, and in that regard there is more room to do that within cultures that allow freedom of the individual, time for contemplation and, literally, space. The high stress, high pressure 40+ hour a work week we live in now is doing nothing but being conducive to weird disease, depression, sleep disorders, sexual dysfunction and GI problems.

And most humans, plopped out into the wilds, they could be ARMED to the teeth, they'll still die, very quickly. That to me is not indicative of growth or success of an animal. It won't MAKE IT in it's own environment?! WTF IS that? Without direct medical intervention how many people would even be alive right now? We are plagued by MORE disease of a chronic, degenerative, autoimmune type than ever before, and not only are we plagued by it, we live and reproduce with it, bypassing natural selection that would normally maintain the strength of the species.

The heavier we rely on technology, the further I see human beings, as viable animals, sliding DOWN the evolutionary scale. Spiritually bankrupt and physically bereft, a crippled species permanently WELDED to its machines that only places value on it's almighty god $$$. I simply don't see that as being healthy or natural or successful. Our pervasive culture of More/Better/Faster/Louder doesn't make it better, it just makes it smelly, rude and self indulgent.

The dance, music, clothing, art, etc. of the ancient cultures, all that was a part of WHO they were, tradition and ritual, there was stories and histories RIGHT there, and because it was seen as being without value then it is STILL perceived as having no value.

Yes, it's far better to have these brief, one day plastic holidays that consist of spending and acquiring MORE, screw tradition, screw ritual give me my gifts and let me get back to work to make more money ...

I'm so disgusted with modern man I can't even work up a decent spit over it. But to make such a ... damned ignorant comment as saying that the culture/tradition/beliefs of the American Indian were STAGNANT?! When the MOTHERFUCKING CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES is based on the Constitution of the IROQUOIS which was developed BEFORE any European contact?! GET THE HELL OUT OF HERE, THAT is not a STAGNANT dead culture! They were democrats before WE were democrats! (our Deist forefathers just had the sense to borrow something that worked).
 
The excuse here for genocide is rediculious. If customs do not change, this is not a criteria for calling life "expendable"

Putting a value on life because you are on the outside looking in on things you have no understanding of is just atrocious

The 10 commadments haven't changed, does that mean that "though shall not kill" is now obscolete?


redguru said:
I disagree wholeheartedly, your criteria is entirely subjective. The entire purpose of our existence is to evolve into a more viable species. The useful lifespan of most aboriginal groups remained stagnant for millenia. The American Indians had no changes in musical or decorative art and only a couple of tribes even had begun a written language. The Northern and Southwestern tribes that were less nomadic had no changes in architecture in the same period. Dress, cooking methodology and utensils and weaponry also unchanged. Religious pantheons remained the same except when tribes remained in contact with other tribes.
 
musclemom said:
And most humans, plopped out into the wilds, they could be ARMED to the teeth, they'll still die, very quickly. That to me is not indicative of growth or success of an animal. It won't MAKE IT in it's own environment?! WTF IS that? Without direct medical intervention how many people would even be alive right now? We are plagued by MORE disease of a chronic, degenerative, autoimmune type than ever before, and not only are we plagued by it, we live and reproduce with it, bypassing natural selection that would normally maintain the strength of the species.

The heavier we rely on technology, the further I see human beings, as viable animals, sliding DOWN the evolutionary scale. Spiritually bankrupt and physically bereft, a crippled species permanently WELDED to its machines that only places value on it's almighty god $$$. I simply don't see that as being healthy or natural or successful. Our pervasive culture of More/Better/Faster/Louder doesn't make it better, it just makes it smelly, rude and self indulgent.
.


Do you know how bad life was before technology? It was hell. it was full of helplessness, disease, anger, hopelessness, misery.

I see a species that realizes that self determination via technology is its only hope who is constantly finding new ways to achieve its own liberation.

FTR natural selection is a barbaric, evil, amoral principle. It keeps the species strong solely by amorally promoting the strong and purging the weak in a fasion similiar to what the Nazis envisioned. The fact that we use technology to avoid natural selection is something to be proud of. I'm more comfortable relying on intelligent, compassionate humans than on arbitrary genetic mutations in DNA, which has the empathy of a rock, to determine if I live or die.

And we have less chronic diseases now mainly because we live long enough to get them. And when they do hit they hit at a later age. In the 1860s heart disease struck in the 30s and 40s. And they are reasonably easy to avoid with technology & lifestyle.

Your philosophy on life sounds extremely brutal, vulnerability-oriented and unforgiving to me.

 
I'm not excusing genocide, where in any of my posts do I condone any action? My ancestors except for my one great-great grandmother (A Cree indian) didn't come over here till the 1890's at the earliest.

Musclemom, addressing your problems with technology in this forum is slightly ironic, as without written communication we would never have corresponded.

GJohnson, If you have a problem with genocide why aren't you in the Sudan right now protesting the outright extermination of mostly christian blacks in Darfur by the government and Arab militias? Stalin, and Chairman Mao commited vastly more heinous acts.
 
I love it when folks contradict themselves. Your whole point for the descruction of a race or culture is that the race has not evolved in millenias but yet you pose an example of age old tribal in fighting...



redguru said:
GJohnson, If you have a problem with genocide why aren't you in the Sudan right now protesting the outright extermination of mostly christian blacks in Darfur by the government and Arab militias? Stalin, and Chairman Mao commited vastly more heinous acts.
 
Lao Tzu said:
Do you know how bad life was before technology? It was hell. it was full of helplessness, disease, anger, hopelessness, misery.

I see a species that realizes that self determination via technology is its only hope who is constantly finding new ways to achieve its own liberation.

FTR natural selection is a barbaric, evil, amoral principle. It keeps the species strong solely by amorally promoting the strong and purging the weak in a fasion similiar to what the Nazis envisioned. The fact that we use technology to avoid natural selection is something to be proud of. I'm more comfortable relying on intelligent, compassionate humans than on arbitrary genetic mutations in DNA, which has the empathy of a rock, to determine if I live or die.

And we have less chronic diseases now mainly because we live long enough to get them. And when they do hit they hit at a later age. In the 1860s heart disease struck in the 30s and 40s. And they are reasonably easy to avoid with technology & lifestyle.

Your philosophy on life sounds extremely brutal, vulnerability-oriented and unforgiving to me.
1. Fact: The average hunter-gatherer worked about 15 HOURS a week to take care of business for life, the rest was spent being silly, screwing chillin, doing whatever (which ties in with about how much time modern man actually works at his desk ...)

2. Natural selection is no more brutal than any other fact of natural life. It is reality. Our species is the result of natural selection, what's so brutal about that?

3. Obesity is on the rise, many cancers are on the rise (although humans are doing better at "controlling" some of them), autoimmune diseases in particular (which is the body's immune system going completely beserk) are on the rise and all of them are hitting younger and younger people. While these numbers can be skewed by statisticians the fact is, while our species may (or may not, seriously, ever walk around a REALLY old graveyard?) be living longer, frankly we are not living WELL. We have the audacity to be the fattest country in the world when how many people die of starvation a day in other lands? And you think that's GOOD?! We make the biggest, strongest bombs, but children throughout the world can't get the basic nutrition they need to avert blindness? And you think that's a natural state of affairs? Psychotically violent crime just keeps going up, and up, and up, and that's indicative of a healthy society?

Yet you call me brutal. I'm just calling a spade a spade.
 
Top Bottom