plornive
New member
sk*,
How about just living together and promising to love and support each other until death? If she trusts you, she should have not problem with this.
This really exposes the current idea of marriage for what it is --- a financial contract. A prenup rectifies this.
A prenup is not like planning for divorce. It is an amendment to the policies regarding divorce. It's not like one is assuming divorce will happen. Dividing assets in 2 is an unfair policy.
If your future wife trusts you completely, she should not mind signing a prenup. Although you may trust someone enough to bet half of your current and future assets, why should you? The current policies are unfair to men.
MattTheSkyWalker,
Do you know if there is a way to make prenups last more than 10 years? And why do you say that prenups are unnecessary for 99.999% of the population? Even if someone aquires even just a million in assets, a prenup should be useful. If a very rich guy loses half of his assets, he will still be very well-off. This is not true for someone with around a million in assets, right?
How about just living together and promising to love and support each other until death? If she trusts you, she should have not problem with this.
This really exposes the current idea of marriage for what it is --- a financial contract. A prenup rectifies this.
A prenup is not like planning for divorce. It is an amendment to the policies regarding divorce. It's not like one is assuming divorce will happen. Dividing assets in 2 is an unfair policy.
If your future wife trusts you completely, she should not mind signing a prenup. Although you may trust someone enough to bet half of your current and future assets, why should you? The current policies are unfair to men.
MattTheSkyWalker,
Do you know if there is a way to make prenups last more than 10 years? And why do you say that prenups are unnecessary for 99.999% of the population? Even if someone aquires even just a million in assets, a prenup should be useful. If a very rich guy loses half of his assets, he will still be very well-off. This is not true for someone with around a million in assets, right?