Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

For it or against it: Abortion

  • Thread starter Thread starter the_clockwork
  • Start date Start date
man. . .this one always starts a shite storm.

me? abortion is killing. . .lots of people out there that need to get dead. . .most of them aren't babies, though. . .
 
It's the woman's choice. And choice necessitates... like, having a choice and stuff.

I think most of the anti-abortionists are bible-thumpers who think every one of the 6 billion lives on the earth are important, in which case I suggest they go live in Africa or something.



:cow:
 
what about women who are using abortion as a birth control?

don't you think that is messed up?
 
the_clockwork said:
what about women who are using abortion as a birth control?

don't you think that is messed up?

As long as abortion is available, people will abuse it as a form of birth control. It's invariant.



:cow:
 
I'm pro choice, but that doesn't mean I'm pro abortion, I would never tell a woman what she could or couldn't do with her body. My hope is that she would have been more careful but what about the acidents w/ broken rubbers and if the normal preventatives just failed, gonna tell her that she HAS to have the baby, not me. I would never tell her that she has to carry a baby full term just to give it away either, that just seems to cruel to the woman. That's for the people who say, "there's always adoption"....
 
digimon7068 said:
man. . .this one always starts a shite storm.

me? abortion is killing. . .lots of people out there that need to get dead. . .most of them aren't babies, though. . .

so you believe a baby is a human the second of conception?
 
I've met AAP in person and he isn't gay.. we went went out and pounded some beers
 
the_clockwork said:
so you believe a baby is a human the second of conception?

i try not get that philisophical about it. . .i just think it's killing. . .it's really not any more complex than that. . .

the world is already over-populated and the population of assholes is growing at an alarming, exponential rate. . .that said, i guess i hope that the people that decide to have abortions are mainly the assholes that shouldn't be allowed to reproduce in the first place :whatever:
 
Pro Choice Christian here

I dont think its a human life at the second of conception.

That would be like thinking everytime I had my period ; each egg was a different life waiting to be born.
 
BIKINIMOM said:
If you don't believe in abortion, don't have one. What could be simpler? It really isn't all that complicated to me.

Quit trying to simplify the issue, dammit. One person's personal beliefs should always be pressed onto every other person in the world.



:cow:
 
I'm Pro Choice but I'm not necessarily pro abortion either.

I am a big pusher of birth control, sex education (including the real gore aspect of STD's and the actual birthing process) and the younger the better and every year in school right through freshman year of college (after that hell, if that wasn't enough you're on your own) and no I don't give hoot what mommy and daddy have to say - it's human biology and ethics and teachable in school.

Humans are very often careless with their bodies, hearts and sexual organs.

That said I also don't think everyone should breed either - but people are allowed to make these kinds of choices on their own.

So if you have the choice to breed you should also have the choice not to bring a child into the world and as people tend to bring a child into the for the wrong reasons people will naturally use abortions for the wrong reasons as well. All you can do is educate people and hope they understood and heed the advice given.

While I find abortion being used as birth control to be reprehensible, I don't feel differently towards those that are careless breeders to bring children into the world to save their marriage, get a marriage or do what they think society and their peers expect them to do when they are not equipped mentally, emotionally, physically or financially to do so.
 
BIKINIMOM said:
If you don't believe in abortion, don't have one. What could be simpler? It really isn't all that complicated to me.

'zackly.

whether or not I'm 'for' or against abortion, i am for each woman's right to choose for herself.
 
samoth said:
Quit trying to simplify the issue, dammit. One person's personal beliefs should always be pressed onto every other person in the world.

:cow:

:FRlol:

The way I see it, if a woman chooses to have an abortion, then that's up to her, and the bloke can't do fuck all about it, just like if a woman decides she wants to keep the child, and the bloke doesn't, then he shouldn't legally be required to contribute to it's upkeep.

Those religious nuts that actively campaign against women's right to abortion, jesus, cannae fucking stand them :rolleyes:
 
the_clockwork said:
What are your sides and reasonings?

For it...IMO if you are not able to take good care of them dont have them. I would want to give my kid a stable/happy family and everything else he deserves. There is no way i would put him up for adoption, I wouldnt be able to live with myself knowing that my kid is out there being raised by someone else.
 
I'd go so far as to say 50% of the children being born in today's world, MINIMUM 50%.........are born into the wrong circumstances and start off in this world on the wrong foot. I'm not happy with a woman who's been careless and has to have an abortion, but so be it....it's between her and god......end of discussion. But the powers that be realized a long time ago that "WE" are a resource............a resource for them to manipulate and use. Unfortunately, most of us never ascend past that and just come back time and again into the same set of circumstances. There'll be a settle up one day though.........everything comes round.
 
the_clockwork said:
what about women who are using abortion as a birth control?

don't you think that is messed up?

Yeah i dont agree with that one....i've worked at a ob/gyn place a few yrs ago and i've witnessed quiet a few disturbing situations...little girls as young as 14 with a few abortions, i mean c'mon-wonder where her parents are. I think there should be a law, set a limit...unless its rape then thats a different situation.
 
samoth said:
Somehow, I don't think AAP needs to worry about that unless he gets raped.



:cow:


That is a very real possibility for me each time I dare venture out in public. Hordes of lust crazed wimmin follow me around, I can practically hear their zombified hormones moaning my name as they gravitate towards my aphrodiasic orbit like a meteor hurtling through space.
 
samoth said:
It's the woman's choice. And choice necessitates... like, having a choice and stuff.

I think most of the anti-abortionists are bible-thumpers who think every one of the 6 billion lives on the earth are important, in which case I suggest they go live in Africa or something.



:cow:

I'm against it excepting cases of rape, incest or life of the mother being in danger. I am completely against second term abortion because I know of two second term babies who have lived. I am not a religious person - closer to a believer leaning agnostic than anything.

I'm also not going to state my reasons because it's too hot button to be civil about over the internet.
 
the_clockwork said:
what about if you got a woman pregnant and she had an abortion w/o your consent?


If we were not married, her choice.

If we were married, it would require both our consent.
 
nefertiti said:
I'm against it excepting cases of rape, incest or life of the mother being in danger. I am completely against second term abortion because I know of two second term babies who have lived. I am not a religious person - closer to a believer leaning agnostic than anything.

I'm also not going to state my reasons because it's too hot button to be civil about over the internet.
That's the point of the interwebs...stirring up shit that won't change anyone's mind, just for fun...
arguingontheinternet.jpg
 
Be interesting to see what percentage of the pro-life crowd are actually females.
 
javaguru said:
That's the point of the interwebs...stirring up shit that won't change anyone's mind, just for fun...
arguingontheinternet.jpg

I love a good debate, in person. But I've seen this one only go sour. On the off topic board for the school I went to for undergrad we actually banned it as a topic because grown adults were so incapable of behaving themselves when discussing this one issue. I also don't want to accidentally step on the toes of a female here, nor do I want to get grouped with the bible thumpers. I was actually pro choice in high school....then I went to college and observed a few (a lot of) things that drastically changed my tune. That's all I'm saying on the subject.

Oh. And I'm not against the morning after pill.
 
I would have to say I'm against any second or late term abortion except for special circumstances.

I cant imagine what would take so long to decide if you wanted an abortion or not.
 
After the first 12 weeks, no go unless the death issue came up for either the mom or the child.
 
I think it is up to the woman and the situation. I have friends that have had abortions and I don't think of them as any less. Is it for me? Nope I got pregnant at 21 and took responsibility. I am so glad that I did also because my kids are the best things that happened to me. I decided it was not for me even though I wasn't ready because I was an adult and had a good job and it would have been selfish of me to not have that baby.
 
For it. There are enough deadbeat parents in the world. A kid shouldn't have to live with that.

I don't know why the Catholics still preach on this issue so much. If the parents can't buck up when the chips are down then they shouldn't be bringing a kid into the world. For those that decide to have one for cases other than rape or underage abuse the father and mother should have to involuntarily opt for mastectomy and vasectomy operations as punishment.
 
txbondsman said:
I'm pro choice, but that doesn't mean I'm pro abortion, I would never tell a woman what she could or couldn't do with her body. My hope is that she would have been more careful but what about the acidents w/ broken rubbers and if the normal preventatives just failed, gonna tell her that she HAS to have the baby, not me. I would never tell her that she has to carry a baby full term just to give it away either, that just seems to cruel to the woman. That's for the people who say, "there's always adoption"....


Morning after pill.
 
It's the battle of good vs evil

there are lots of cons to it but there are still pros to it

speaking about partial birth abortions (before they were illegal).. how can a woman carry a child that long and decide she didn't want it anymore? The kid had a beating heart yet many of women went through partial births
 
the_clockwork said:
It's the battle of good vs evil

there are lots of cons to it but there are still pros to it

speaking about partial birth abortions (before they were illegal).. how can a woman carry a child that long and decide she didn't want it anymore? The kid had a beating heart yet many of women went through partial births

Some are lazy and just wait too long to have it done. Some I guess they think about it a lot and they finally realize they can't do it. I am sure in some cases too they think they can win over the guy or he will man up and be there for them the way she wants and if he doesn't she then decides that she can't do it. Who knows some chicks are crazy.
 
nefertiti said:
I'm against it excepting cases of rape, incest or life of the mother being in danger. I am completely against second term abortion because I know of two second term babies who have lived. I am not a religious person - closer to a believer leaning agnostic than anything.

I'm also not going to state my reasons because it's too hot button to be civil about over the internet.


I forgot about that one.
 
I'm against abortion but believe a woman should have a right to choose during the first 14 weeks. After that point, it becomes moot and the woman is carrying a separate entity that should be allowed to have a say in its own existence.
 
While I don't think I have the right to tell someone they should or shouldn't have one, I am thankful every day that the woman who gave birth to my 2 beautiful daughters decided not to have an abortion.
 
I dont understand why women would use abortion as birth control.
It is expensive (compared to condoms, the pill, the shot, etc).
 
nefertiti said:
Oh. And I'm not against the morning after pill.


When you say that do you mean the "morning after pill" or do you mean the RU486 pill?

Some people (and I'm not saying you) don't know the difference or that there even is one. I was just wondering because the morning after pill is basically a high dose of an oral contraceptive.
 
redguru said:
I'm against abortion but believe a woman should have a right to choose during the first 14 weeks. After that point, it becomes moot and the woman is carrying a separate entity that should be allowed to have a say in its own existence.

I would have to agree with this..

if we banned it all together the "shitty" parents list would grow immensely
 
Stefka said:
And I'm against capital punishment, just in case you were wondering.

THIS I don't ever get!

Why is it OK to have abortions, but not OK to purge a piece of shit from society?
 
BNG said:
THIS I don't ever get!

Why is it OK to have abortions, but not OK to purge a piece of shit from society?

Exactly, kill the innocent or untainted but allow the dregs of humanity to feed off the system for 40 years or more.
 
BNG said:
THIS I don't ever get!

Why is it OK to have abortions, but not OK to purge a piece of shit from society?

oh my.. valid point!
 
velvett said:
When you say that do you mean the "morning after pill" or do you mean the RU486 pill?

Some people (and I'm not saying you) don't know the difference or that there even is one. I was just wondering because the morning after pill is basically a high dose of an oral contraceptive.

Nooooo. I mean the morning after pill. The high dose of birth control pill. Not the abortion by pill (though religious folk would say they both are). Though I guess I have less strong feelings about the RU486 because you have to take it so early on.

One more thing on the subject (ugh, I can't stay away) -

While I am against abortion in most cases, I don't necessarily support legislation controling it. I don't think there's any way to really protect the people I think should have the option (rape victems, etc), while limiting the rest. You basically would force rape victims into a situation where they would have to go to the police to have access (a tall order for some), and you might also get more women claiming rape when they weren't to get access to the option. It would seriously be a mess, a legal nightmare. I also think we'd see a return of back alley abortions. because I personally have no religious moral objections, they are objections based purely on observations, i'd rather it stay legal than push women into making desperate choices.
 
the_clockwork said:
I would have to agree with this..

if we banned it all together the "shitty" parents list would grow immensely


Or people could give the child up for adoption.

Some of you keep forgetting this third option.

Carry the child to term and let someone more capable raise it.
 
Last edited:
Interesting subject :qt: for the most part, if you have a brain, you have an opinion.

I actually was able to participate in a biomedical ethical debate about end/beginning of life issues from a pagan perspective at the magickal congress. What's interesting is that as community hospitals are closing due to funding cuts, increasingly it's the Catholic church that's taking over for community hospital services, which means it's the Catholic doctrine that sets the biomedical ethical standards. There is NEVER an excuse for the use of the morning after pill in the Catholic doctrine, folks, and even abortion as a byproduct of a procedure to save the mother's life is still considered murder under their doctrine.

There's a very real fear, particularly in some parts of the country, that someday the question may not be so much what your personal feelings on beginning (or end) of life are, but what OTHER people/organizations feel.

While we all had our own opinions, the one thing we could agree on is that both of these issues are a personal matter and no one should have the right to impose their personal ethics onto another individual.

My personal belief? I believe the decision lies solely with the woman, period. Nuturing and bringing life to fruition is up to her. I also believe in reincarnation and the true immortality of the divine soul. In other words, birth control and abortions be damned, you can't keep someone from being born who was meant to come to this plane.

Shall we talk about end of life measures and how they do not believe in using unconscious pain relief for unremitting agony, that instead you are to counsel the patient that suffering is good for the soul? They do, you know. Their doctrine, folks: "However, painkillers that cause unconsciousness need special consideration. For a person not only has to be able to satisfy his or her moral duties and family obligations; he or she also has to prepare himself or herself with full consciousness for meeting Christ." http://www.newadvent.org/library/docs_df80eu.htm

Let's talk about bone cancer and prepping to meet Christ, shall we? :rolleyes:
 
musclemom said:
While we all had our own opinions, the one thing we could agree on is that both of these issues are a personal matter and no one should have the right to impose their personal ethics onto another individual.

My personal belief? I believe the decision lies solely with the woman, period. Nuturing and bringing life to fruition is up to her. I also believe in reincarnation and the true immortality of the divine soul. In other words, birth control and abortions be damned, you can't keep someone from being born who was meant to come to this plane.

THAT - is the truth.
 
nefertiti said:
Nooooo. I mean the morning after pill. The high dose of birth control pill. Not the abortion by pill (though religious folk would say they both are). Though I guess I have less strong feelings about the RU486 because you have to take it so early on.

One more thing on the subject (ugh, I can't stay away) -

While I am against abortion in most cases, I don't necessarily support legislation controling it. I don't think there's any way to really protect the people I think should have the option (rape victems, etc), while limiting the rest. You basically would force rape victims into a situation where they would have to go to the police to have access (a tall order for some), and you might also get more women claiming rape when they weren't to get access to the option. It would seriously be a mess, a legal nightmare. I also think we'd see a return of back alley abortions. because I personally have no religious moral objections, they are objections based purely on observations, i'd rather it stay legal than push women into making desperate choices.

:)

You are one smart cookie.
 
nefertiti said:
Or people could give the child up for adoption.

You people keep forgetting this third option.

Carry the child to term and let someone more capable raise it.

"you people", which I guess I'm one of, didn't either. I addressed it specifically. I said, I didn't think that a woman who WAS being responsibe and for whatever reason she became pregnant, i.e. condom broke/leaked, she's on the pill and still became pregnant, diaphram failed to work, contraceptive foam failed to prevent pregnancy, etc. I find it to be too cruel to make her carry a baby full term and then to have to give it up. I don't think that's fair. This complely disreguards the woman who doesnt use protection and counts on abortion for the first means of contraception...

Nefertiti, the term "you people" is so inflamatory, couldn't you have chosen better words, especially since I did address this issue? How does this sound, "You people need to read the posts"....

not to good IMO....
 
txbondsman said:
"you people", which I guess I'm one of, didn't either. I addressed it specifically. I said, I didn't think that a woman who WAS being responsibe and for whatever reason she became pregnant, i.e. condom broke/leaked, she's on the pill and still became pregnant, diaphram failed to work, contraceptive foam failed to prevent pregnancy, etc. I find it to be too cruel to make her carry a baby full term and then to have to give it up. I don't think that's fair. This complely disreguards the woman who doesnt use protection and counts on abortion for the first means of contraception...

Nefertiti, the term "you people" is so inflamatory, couldn't you have chosen better words, especially since I did address this issue? How does this sound, "You people need to read the posts"....

not to good IMO....
Im W/ txbondsman on this. To "ME" Im for a choce. A womens choce, I have two kids and I would of been pissed if my x would have gotten an abortion. That being said I just think it would be bad to go back some 30 odd years and redo the law.... Just saynnnnn!
 
time said:
Im W/ txbondsman on this. To "ME" Im for a choce. A womens choce, I have two kids and I would of been pissed if my x would have gotten an abortion. That being said I just think it would be bad to go back some 30 odd years and redo the law.... Just saynnnnn!
Laws change all the time, rarely does any controversial law stay permanent. Drugs were all legal at one point, alcohol was illegal at one point, etc. Nothing in government is immutable.
 
txbondsman said:
"you people", which I guess I'm one of, didn't either. I addressed it specifically. I said, I didn't think that a woman who WAS being responsibe and for whatever reason she became pregnant, i.e. condom broke/leaked, she's on the pill and still became pregnant, diaphram failed to work, contraceptive foam failed to prevent pregnancy, etc. I find it to be too cruel to make her carry a baby full term and then to have to give it up. I don't think that's fair. This complely disreguards the woman who doesnt use protection and counts on abortion for the first means of contraception...

Nefertiti, the term "you people" is so inflamatory, couldn't you have chosen better words, especially since I did address this issue? How does this sound, "You people need to read the posts"....

not to good IMO....


Careless choice of words, sure - and I did see your post. But there were several people who kept saying things like "shitty parents etc etc" who didn't address it and I was too lazy to find them all in the thread. I'll change it.
 
superdave said:
Laws change all the time, rarely does any controversial law stay permanent. Drugs were all legal at one point, alcohol was illegal at one point, etc. Nothing in government is immutable.
Good point SD
I work on the Hill so I know what your saynnn.
 
digimon7068 said:
lots of people out there that need to get dead. . .most of them aren't babies, though. . .

But they ALL started out as babies.....born to a mother or parents that probably couldn't take care of it properly because they were too screwed up to even take care of themselves.

I'm pro choice.
 
digimon7068 said:
the line forms behind me sparky. . .

ahemmm, wrong there Scooter, age before beauty!
 
Top Bottom