good thing i havent said or writtne anything smart enuf yet that warrants protecting my rights. 

eddymerckx said:yes. i remember two offhand--federal trademark infringement suits. as far as collecting the fee--when the payment is made by the defendant and deposited into my trust account--i promise you the firm gets paid--however, as Bill noted that is assuming the defendant can pay and --the kicker is the total amount is taxable to the plaintiff--so if they win $100 and get $25 in atty fees, the plaintif is taxed as if the awared was $125.
in trademark suits, they key is if you don't sue to enforce your rights, you can lose your rights to the mark itself--som macdonalds is not being mean when it sues the hamburger stand up the street, it has to to defend its exclusive right to the mark. so even the infringer has no $$, you have to sue or risk losing the mark.
section 1117 of the lanham act:
(a) Profits; damages and costs; attorney fees
When a violation of any right of the registrant of a mark registered in the Patent and Trademark Office, a violation under section 1125 (a) or (d) of this title, or a willful violation under section 1125 (c) of this title, shall have been established in any civil action arising under this chapter, the plaintiff shall be entitled, subject to the provisions of sections 1111 and 1114 of this title, and subject to the principles of equity, to recover
(1) defendant’s profits,
(2) any damages sustained by the plaintiff, and
(3) the costs of the action. The court shall assess such profits and damages or cause the same to be assessed under its direction. In assessing profits the plaintiff shall be required to prove defendant’s sales only; defendant must prove all elements of cost or deduction claimed.