Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Dems show their true colors on this medicare bill...

CheeseDick said:


you mean goverment as a monopoly?

I can;t speak for ABL, but the phenomenon that often occurs is that the government emplaces controls designed to preclude development of a monopoly, which actually result in higher bars to entry for nwer competitors, effectively entrenching the monopoly as a monopoly.

Breaking companies up is class warfare.
 
I still think the cost of entry is too high to have true competition in utilities. I don't see how a company could ever recoup their plant investments unless they were sure of getting enough of the customers to make a profit. With the alleged profit margins I don't see 5-6 companies staying in business with only 15% of the market.
 
MattTheSkywalker said:


I can;t speak for ABL, but the phenomenon that often occurs is that the government emplaces controls designed to preclude development of a monopoly, which actually result in higher bars to entry for nwer competitors, effectively entrenching the monopoly as a monopoly.

Breaking companies up is class warfare.

So does this mean a company like AT&T actually benefited from being split apart?
 
CheeseDick said:


So does this mean a company like AT&T actually benefited from being split apart?

No.

The resulting companies benefitted because they were created with $0 startup costs, and new, post-split competition was effectively frozen out.
 
Top Bottom