Citruscide said:
Nelson, I don't think I have ever said your book was bogus. I also don't think I've ever asked you anything more than to back up your statements with anything else but more statements ... Give me something to work with.. give the EF members something to work with.
You're right, I'm an attorney. A hot blooded attorney who questions many things... not only does it help clients that I have helped in the past, but it helps me see through the illusionary fog of knowledge that some people put up ... and see through it to what is really there...
I have no idea what you do with your time Nelson. I'm happy for your family and the success you are claiming. I really do wish nothing but the best for you.
But you have to realize something... This is EliteFitness.Com -- the BEST fitness site on the Internet. If you are going to make some wild claims... please, back them up with something. It's all anyone is really asking... we don't need detailed studies from various scientific institutions... but perhaps things you have learned in your own life... experiences you may have drawn upon... enlighten us... and then discuss it... in a rationale manner. People will disagree with you... they aren't necessarily fools... but perhaps people who have had their own experiences to the contrary... and that is where the arguments with facts and studies to bolster one side of the story come into play.
If I walked into court and told the judge this is the way it should be without bringing any case law to the plate with me... I'd not only get laughed out of the courtroom, but I'd most likely be in violations of various ethical duties that are attributed to all attorneys.... Now, I don't expect to hold you to my level of moral integrity... but perhaps a little bit of backing behind your claims would be somewhat refreshing.
C-ditty
Your moral integrity? That's funny.
The truth of the matter, Citrueside ,is that I probably give more explanations than a most anyone else on this board. It's just that some people can't or won't acceot anything beyond a "cut and paste" study. And I don't cut and paste. And for that reason it's fashionable to attack me. But no one EVER attacks the methodology. They attack the lack of "cut and paste" studies.
So essentially, you're full of shit. You're tried to discredit me. You make false accusations. Then I'm sure you checked the acknowledgments in Ricks book and realize what a tool you've been. So now you're waffling on the issue. And you're wrong again.
Case closed.