The idea that a great number of people who have led successful lives and made meaningful contributions to society did so without any philosophical or literary background/inspiration will come as an equally great surprise to you.
The idea that many of those libertarians, founding fathers, and scientists extracted something of worth from said literature did so outside the classroom environment (i.e. on their own) will come as an equally great surprise to you.
The idea that there are more professions in the world today that do not require any philosophical or literary background far outnumber those that do will come as an equally great surprise to you.
Shall I reaffirm my claim? Yes I shall: the teaching of literature and philosophy is NOT meaningful to society. Those who can find inspiration in literature or philosophy can do so OUTSIDE of the classroom environment, and if they are interested, WILL. Those who DO NOT, however, have any interest, and will not find any inspiration in, literature or philosophy (i.e. me and 23908932052343232324 others), and do not require any school-based knowledge of literature or philosophy for ANYTHING in their lives are having their time WASTED and their minds POLLUTED by these things being taught in school.
Quite frankly, I have no interest in fiction, and the last thing a computer programmer needs is to know the theme of some historical piece of writing or whether or not it is morally acceptable to use /* */ comments over double-slash comments. English/Philosophy classes in HS and college have been nothing but a) a waste of time and b) a waste of money to me. Period.
-Warik