Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

In case anyone is confused...

Status
Not open for further replies.
to teach about how safe contraceptives are? I can't even comment because that makes no sense.

Palin is foolish because she has first hand experience that not teaching about safe sex and having abstinence only education leads to unplanned pregnancies.

I'm not trying to force sex or contraceptives on anyone...lol.

yeah you are trying to force it on us...remember i was told to keep my kid at home.
and you have firsthand experience that contraceptives don't work
so we are back to square one, truely the best method is teaching a combo of both absitence and contraceptives
 
Palin is foolish because she has first hand experience that not teaching about safe sex and having abstinence only education leads to unplanned pregnancies.
.

in no way does this have anything to do with you or anybody elses family.......just your thoughts here.

it seems to me you are saying she is foolish for not teaching her daughter about abstinence, doesn't that conflict with your choices about abstinence?

doesn't make sense at all, seems flippy floppy
 
This is a great case study in what happens when you let a single person impinge upon free speech.

Your speech on here isn't free. Even if you do pay for it.

It's approved. And it looks like she didn't approve of it.
 
yeah you are trying to force it on us...remember i was told to keep my kid at home.
and you have firsthand experience that contraceptives don't work
so we are back to square one, truely the best method is teaching a combo of both absitence and contraceptives
I never said I was adverse to contraceptives and abstinence being taught as long as the abstinence part remains secular education and doesn't start quoting bible verses, etc.

I can't use hormonal contraceptives for medical reasons and was not trying to prevent pregnancy, although I wasn't trying to get prego, either. I was engaged.

PS -- not that any of that is any of your concern.

PPS -- I was 37 not 17 when I got prego. We are talking about sex ed in SCHOOLS here.
 
in no way does this have anything to do with you or anybody elses family.......just your thoughts here.

it seems to me you are saying she is foolish for not teaching her daughter about abstinence, doesn't that conflict with your choices about abstinence?

doesn't make sense at all, seems flippy floppy

and that is the crux of the hypocrisy and i can't let it go.
it's okay for her to comment on palin's decisions, but not okay for me to comment on hers (hrs)
 
ummm whoever does it im seriously going to fuckin be really mad....this place needs a change if this kind of shit is going on...new rules are good
 
in no way does this have anything to do with you or anybody elses family.......just your thoughts here.

it seems to me you are saying she is foolish for not teaching her daughter about abstinence, doesn't that conflict with your choices about abstinence?

doesn't make sense at all, seems flippy floppy
your question makes no sense to me. rephrase.
 
and that is the crux of the hypocrisy and i can't let it go.
it's okay for her to comment on palin's decisions, but not okay for me to comment on hers (hrs)
Repeat...and this is the last time I'm saying this. I'm not trying to prevent people from teaching children like Palin is. I was an adult who wanted a child, had a child and is raising a child on my own. My child is irrelevant to the discussion of sex education in schools or the topic of teen pregnancy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom