How cum Barry doesn't send teh drones after their arses?

[miplank]

Bro, the argument was about unconventional warfare not conventional! Considering your post for a second, I think the Marines would have laughed in your face for saying such an unpatriotic statement.. Besides, the Marines landed in Russia during the Russian Revolution, and were kicked out by Wilson because they were murdering everything and everybody, even inanimated objects were being destroyed by the Marines. Remember, Marines wipeout ecosystems...Wilson, who was a commie lover did not want the core to commit genocide on his commie cousins...



"God has a hard on for Marines, because we kill everything we see. He plays His games, we play ours. To show our appreciation for so much power, we keep heaven packed with fresh souls. God was here before the Marine Corps, so you can give your heart to Jesus, but your ass belongs to the corps."

marines are

 

[redsamurai]

Bro, the argument was about unconventional warfare not conventional! Considering your post for a second, I think the Marines would have laughed in your face for saying such an unpatriotic statement.. Besides, the Marines landed in Russia during the Russian Revolution, and were kicked out by Wilson because they were murdering everything and everybody, even inanimated objects were being destroyed by the Marines. Remember, Marines wipeout ecosystems...Wilson, who was a commie lover did not want the core to commit genocide on his commie cousins...



"God has a hard on for Marines, because we kill everything we see. He plays His games, we play ours. To show our appreciation for so much power, we keep heaven packed with fresh souls. God was here before the Marine Corps, so you can give your heart to Jesus, but your ass belongs to the corps."

1) exactly what is unpatriotic about saying a tour through the old soviet union would have cost money and lives that would have been indescribeable. Of course our soldiers had some superiority but we were running low on our war machine as well. I mean how many people died during ww2? Whatever number it is you can triple it if not quad it going through the soviet union.

2) and what primate said that quote by the way?

 

[ledhead]

1) exactly what is unpatriotic about saying a tour through the old soviet union would have cost money and lives that would have been indescribeable. Of course our soldiers had some superiority but we were running low on our war machine as well. I mean how many people died during ww2? Whatever number it is you can triple it if not quad it going through the soviet union.

2) and what primate said that quote by the way?

Again, the thread was about unconventional warfare (nuclear war). If you get time read the entire thread and you will see what the argument is about.. It is unpatriotic to say the United States military would have lost if they would have had a ground war with the Soviets.. I am a jingoist. I have "blue blood." I am a third generation Marine. My grandpa fought in the Pacific in WWII, my father fought in Vietnam, and I fought in Desert Storm, Bosnia, and Samolia... And we all agreed on one thing, the core never loses... That was intrenched in me long before I arrived at Parris Island. Ship Date: July 10, 1989........

Anyway, 550,000 Americans died in WWII... The quote is from Kubrick's Full Metal Jacket. Senior Drill Instructor Hartman is accredited with the quote.

I will get into this a little more tomorrow, I am too tired tonight. There is a lot to it...

 

[PICK3]

The quote is from Kubrick's Full Metal Jacket. Senior Drill Instructor Hartman is accredited with the quote.

"The name's Francis Soyer.

But everybody calls me Psycho.

Any of you guys call me Francis,
and I'll kill you.

You just made the list, buddy.

And I don't like nobody
touching my stuff!

So just keep your meat hooks off.

If I catch any of you guys
in my stuff, I'll kill you.

Also, I don't like
nobody touching me.

Now, any of you homos...

...touch me, and I'll kill you."

Conrad Dunn as Pvt. Francis "Psycho" Soyer (Stripes, 1981)

​

 

[ledhead]

"The name's Francis Soyer. ​

But everybody calls me Psycho. ​

Any of you guys call me Francis,
and I'll kill you. ​

You just made the list, buddy. ​

And I don't like nobody
touching my stuff! ​

So just keep your meat hooks off. ​

If I catch any of you guys
in my stuff, I'll kill you. ​

Also, I don't like
nobody touching me. ​

Now, any of you homos... ​

...touch me, and I'll kill you."​

Conrad Dunn as Pvt. Francis "Psycho" Soyer (Stripes, 1981)​

Lol.... Good movie...

 

[redsamurai]

Lol at the corp never loses....war makes a mockery of such notions. Vietnam is a perfect example. The vietnamese were peasants being fed arms by the soviets and the chinese, we killed WAY more of them then they killed of us....but we still technically lost cause nobody wins in a shithole.

Running through the old soviet union, dude...can you not see how much worse that would have been for us then vietnam? The soviets were no joke dude even if we were better. That's a massive place to invade. You can say all you want about marines but if the supply lines get drawn out they lose, period end of discussion. And the supply lines into Russia would have gotten drawn out. It would have taken every country in Europe to help us. Even the Germans. I mean look what happened to the Germans when they went there....yes they were fighting many different fronts but it wouldn't have mattered and even they admitted it. It's possible that even if America had aligned with the Nazi's we still might not have succeeded in Russia. You would have needed millions of troops in Russia for years to subdue that place.

Nobody questions what happens when the americans first go somewhere, but if we're having problems maintaining places like afghanistan and Iraq, what the hell would have happened in Russia?

Again, the thread was about unconventional warfare (nuclear war). If you get time read the entire thread and you will see what the argument is about.. It is unpatriotic to say the United States military would have lost if they would have had a ground war with the Soviets.. I am a jingoist. I have "blue blood." I am a third generation Marine. My grandpa fought in the Pacific in WWII, my father fought in Vietnam, and I fought in Desert Storm, Bosnia, and Samolia... And we all agreed on one thing, the core never loses... That was intrenched in me long before I arrived at Parris Island. Ship Date: July 10, 1989........

Anyway, 550,000 Americans died in WWII... The quote is from Kubrick's Full Metal Jacket. Senior Drill Instructor Hartman is accredited with the quote.

I will get into this a little more tomorrow, I am too tired tonight. There is a lot to it...

 

[ledhead]

Lol at the corp never loses....war makes a mockery of such notions. Vietnam is a perfect example. The vietnamese were peasants being fed arms by the soviets and the chinese, we killed WAY more of them then they killed of us....but we still technically lost cause nobody wins in a shithole.

Running through the old soviet union, dude...can you not see how much worse that would have been for us then vietnam? The soviets were no joke dude even if we were better. That's a massive place to invade. You can say all you want about marines but if the supply lines get drawn out they lose, period end of discussion. And the supply lines into Russia would have gotten drawn out. It would have taken every country in Europe to help us. Even the Germans. I mean look what happened to the Germans when they went there....yes they were fighting many different fronts but it wouldn't have mattered and even they admitted it. It's possible that even if America had aligned with the Nazi's we still might not have succeeded in Russia. You would have needed millions of troops in Russia for years to subdue that place.

Nobody questions what happens when the americans first go somewhere, but if we're having problems maintaining places like afghanistan and Iraq, what the hell would have happened in Russia?

Apparently, you are determined to piss me off... I already put the stats up for Vietnam... The Marines kicked the NVAs ass all over the place... Not the VC (farmers with pitchfolks). The highly trained and highly motivated NVA. My father is a "primary source," he said the NVA would hump 15 miles out of their way to avoid the Marines... He fought at Khe Sahn... the Marines destroyed the NVA, 16,000 KIA'ed opposed to 200 Marines KIA'ed... 58,000 Americans died in Vietnam. 2-3 million Vietnamese died. My Colonel, who did 3 tours in Nam, said, the Marines were responsible for at least 500,000 NVA deaths. No bombings, just straight-up, hand to hand combat...Does that sound like the Marines lost? NO, the USA lost politically, but not in a military manner...

 

[javaguru]

So, what does any of this have to do what we are talking about???? What is your point?? I proved the Soviets were no threat to the U.S. The Nazis were spread thin, they were everywhere.. That is why historians say they lost...but I say, they lost because the Core rocked their world...

Again, your whole post is full of aphorisms, the latest sound bite of the local news, no insightful information, lack of depth, lack of knowledge on hist, eco and everthing else...

I am bored with you....

Keynesian economics are based on 19th century and earlier thinking...as were Hayeks...

"The ideas of economists and political philosophers, both when they are right and when they are wrong, are more powerful than is commonly understood. Indeed the world is ruled by little else. Practical men, who believe themselves to be quite exempt from any intellectual influence, are usually the slaves of some defunct economist." -Hayek

You have yet to explain how the United States could have delivered enough nuclear weapons deep into the interior of the Soviet Union to "defeat them" in 1946 when our ability to produce nukes was limited as well as a bomber capable of penetrating deep into the Soviet Union from bases in France and England. If you understood anything about the history of the former Soviet Union you would realize that traditional centers of mass don't really matter and they have an amazing ability to mobilize their population to fight "patriotic wars" even though they had a more diverse population than the United States...

Also, you misspelled corps...

 

[ledhead]

Keynesian economics are based on 19th century and earlier thinking...as were Hayeks...

"The ideas of economists and political philosophers, both when they are right and when they are wrong, are more powerful than is commonly understood. Indeed the world is ruled by little else. Practical men, who believe themselves to be quite exempt from any intellectual influence, are usually the slaves of some defunct economist." -Hayek

You have yet to explain how the United States could have delivered enough nuclear weapons deep into the interior of the Soviet Union to "defeat them" in 1946 when our ability to produce nukes was limited as well as a bomber capable of penetrating deep into the Soviet Union from bases in France and England. If you understood anything about the history of the former Soviet Union you would realize that traditional centers of mass don't really matter and they have an amazing ability to mobilize their population to fight "patriotic wars" even though they had a more diverse population than the United States...

Also, you misspelled corps...

Your whole post sounds good. However, you failed to back you claims, again, so I disown your entire post... Second, that is how we say Corps, CORE, which you are not qualified to correct me..

 

[redsamurai]

Apparently, you are determined to piss me off... I already put the stats up for Vietnam... The Marines kicked the NVAs ass all over the place... Not the VC (farmers with pitchfolks). The highly trained and highly motivated NVA. My father is a "primary source," he said the NVA would hump 15 miles out of their way to avoid the Marines... He fought at Khe Sahn... the Marines destroyed the NVA, 16,000 KIA'ed opposed to 200 Marines KIA'ed... 58,000 Americans died in Vietnam. 2-3 million Vietnamese died. My Colonel, who did 3 tours in Nam, said, the Marines were responsible for at least 500,000 NVA deaths. No bombings, just straight-up, hand to hand combat...Does that sound like the Marines lost? NO, the USA lost politically, but not in a military manner...

you don't read well did i not state that in combat we owned the vietnamese? There was just too many of em and we couldn't keep what we gained. THAT IS A FACT and exactly what's going on in the middle east. There's a playbood now on how to beat the U.S....you barely fight em. Of course we killed 2-3 times more vietnamese, but we still LOST in the end. And as well we should have cause we had no business being there in the first place. THe vietnamese didn't want us. If we hadn't pulled out of vietnam we'd still be there.....now if you want to call that a "win", well then fine but we have two greatly differing definitions of "a win"