You wouldn't know a socialist or a communist if it bit you on the ass. If you think Alinsky was a socialist, for example, you've been getting your information from some weird sources.
Supply-side economics is a scam.
Would you be happy to return tax rates to what they were during the Reagan Presidency?
Lol@ you making erroneous assumptions without any evidence. I wish for once you would expound on your statements.
No, I do not think Alinsky was Socialist, I think he was a Marxist, but anyone who knows what they are talking about knows there is no difference between a Socialist and a Marxist ideaology speaking except some Communist countries had vanguard states.
Well, what is Socialism aka Communism? You seem to not know the defintion, so I will give you the correct definition. I will make it real simple so you understand.
The state controls everything and homogenizes all commodities to its people... It was/is a complete failure.. I might add..
Alinsky:
Rules for Radicals, he admits he was a Marxist community organizer. He attempted to promote Communism through the proletariant, that is "working class" in Socialist terms, and "middle class" in Capitalist terms.
Check out: The Communist Confession of faith, and compare it to Alinsky's Rules for Radicals, you might be a little frazzled after you compare them.
Before I go any further, explain to me what you mean by supply-side economics is a scam.