CDD Relationships

[nangiggles]

Was she a practicing christian/spiritual, or whatever it's called BEFORE meeting him?

 

[Sub-Zero]

He does. He'd determine both what constituted 'misbehavior' and what actions would be taken to correct it.

And I think everybody in a wedding party and all the guests are there to support a marriage, otherwise they wouldn't show up at all...regardless, I was the maid of honor til her sister got all upset that she wasn't, so her mom and I have still been planning stuff as if I were.

i just dont get why they have a special name for it, and why they advertised it to everyone at the wedding.

was it on the e-vite?

i wonder what her parents are thinking about the whole thing...

i would be down to beat my wife in private, for fucking up, but i would feel scummy advertising it to the entire wedding party. i would def beat her ass if she told anyone about our CDD

 

[Sub-Zero]

I'm not bible scholar but i do recall there is something in there allowing you to hit your wife or something like that.

the dude Afeedz is talking about is a preacher or whatever, they do not believe in vaginal sex either. just anal

this is an example of why there are so many Ponzi Schemes originating from churches, people will believe anything when they are brainwashed on a weekly basis.

lol so on the wedding invitation it talked about their CDD and how he is gonna fuck her in the ass and beat her and suff?

 

[cindylou]

I don't know this guy but he sounds very manipulative. He's convinced her (by twisiting the scripture) to agree to her own abuse. He sounds scary.

Or, it is a bunch of Christians trying to justify their sexual fetish.

Part of me thinks it's a sexual fetish thing because of certain terms they use. For example, consenual, and "over the knee"

 

[AFeedz]

is she a hoe? is he allowed to fuck her during the physical punishment?

No not at all. This guy is only the 2nd guy she's ever bee with. And I assume he can't fuck her during punishments, but I wouldn't know. I assume adding pleasure would undermine the point.

 

[cindylou]

From the website:

"there is not much difference in paddling a rebellious teenager or her difficult mother"

I'm getting angry

 

[Sub-Zero]

i think that if he is a true smart kind moral man then this could work, because women are animals that need to be lead.

however if he was so pure he wouldnt need physical punishment to control his herd. his mere presence (and sheepdog) would be enough

 

[Sub-Zero]

From the website:

"there is not much difference in paddling a rebellious teenager or her difficult mother"

I'm getting angry

your defiance requires beatings

 

[ceo]

I don't know this guy but he sounds very manipulative. He's convinced her (by twisiting the scripture) to agree to her own abuse. He sounds scary.

sounds like a lot of xtian pastors.

 

[cindylou]

lol

For uncooperative wives, the calf of the lower leg on the same side as the spanking hand can then be used to pin the back of the calf of the wife. Usually pinning one leg is adequate to prevent the other from swinging wildly. Pinning a rebellious wife's inside leg also prevents assuming a mulish *ironing board* position - with the legs extended - since it is almost impossible to do with one leg. As the spanking withers any rebellion, the woman's legs will naturally relax as her resistance fades and she accepts her fate.