Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply US-PHARMACIES UGL OZ
Raptor Labs UGFREAK OxygenPharm
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplyUS-PHARMACIES UGL OZUGFREAKRaptor LabsOxygenPharm

Why don't cars have......

why don't cars fly?
 
I was just thinking about how some cars/trucks have such horrible turning radii..... slow down the inside wheel, and you can virtually eliminate turning radius and spin on a dime
 
When I was little my father had a Massey Ferguson 235 and it had dual brakes you could lock and it would turn on a dime and also help with traction.... cool
 
You don't see it on cars because it would suck. That's why.

If you want a small turning radius, go buy a smart car or a mini cooper.

Say you need to slam on the brakes and, oh whoops, you just hit one of the brakes instead of both, and intstead of missing the car in front of you, you go flying out into on-coming traffic and get t-boned by an 18 wheeler. But hey, your car can turn on a dime.

Plus, people like things simple and easy. Even if someone put 100 trilion dollars out to market a new dual brake pedal car, they would sell zero. Well, 1, and chris302001 bought it because he's a sucker.:biggrin:


Your outer tires spin at a faster rate than the inside tires when turning anyways. Independant suspenision and open differentials have existed for a long time. A Low speed turn with 1 wheel locked would unevenly wear your tires and all sorts of little things like that.

Wheelbase width and length, and steering column ratios determine a turning radius. Not a simultaneous or independant braking.


What made you think of this anyways?

Idea = major engineering a practicality fail, but it's always worth a try.
 
I was just thinking about how some cars/trucks have such horrible turning radii..... slow down the inside wheel, and you can virtually eliminate turning radius and spin on a dime

Have you been out on the roads before? Women can't handle one brake/one accelerator as it is.
 
because the majority of drivers can barely handle a gas/and a brake pedal. No need to start confusing people chris.


You could buy a GMC with quadrasteer.
 
'cause too many people would end up in the ditch or into an oncoming bus.

exactly. this is by far the worst idea ever

imagine peggy soccer mom trying to text hubby on her iphone asking him if he wants rice pilaf or broccoli with that piece of salmon she's gonna overcook while he's "working late" fucking his secretary cuz peggy has stopped giving it up since they got married in the meantime try to perform a 5 degree turn on a 4 lane highway

death
 
Now, if it was an automated system controlled by the car's processor, and tied in to speed, it could potentially work. Like it would only come in at low speeds and tight-radius turns. But you couldn't give average drivers manual control over it without dire consequences.

Or not.

4 wheel steering never really caught on either, even though several manufacturers tried.
 
You don't see it on cars because it would suck. That's why.

If you want a small turning radius, go buy a smart car or a mini cooper.

Say you need to slam on the brakes and, oh whoops, you just hit one of the brakes instead of both, and intstead of missing the car in front of you, you go flying out into on-coming traffic and get t-boned by an 18 wheeler. But hey, your car can turn on a dime.

Plus, people like things simple and easy. Even if someone put 100 trilion dollars out to market a new dual brake pedal car, they would sell zero. Well, 1, and chris302001 bought it because he's a sucker.:biggrin:


Your outer tires spin at a faster rate than the inside tires when turning anyways. Independant suspenision and open differentials have existed for a long time. A Low speed turn with 1 wheel locked would unevenly wear your tires and all sorts of little things like that.

Wheelbase width and length, and steering column ratios determine a turning radius. Not a simultaneous or independant braking.


What made you think of this anyways?

Idea = major engineering a practicality fail, but it's always worth a try.


Sounds like someone worked on cars before..
 
Now, if it was an automated system controlled by the car's processor, and tied in to speed, it could potentially work. Like it would only come in at low speeds and tight-radius turns. But you couldn't give average drivers manual control over it without dire consequences.

Or not.

4 wheel steering never really caught on either, even though several manufacturers tried.

and on some cars, oddly, it seems it didn't improve turning radius at all. IIRC I read a review of a 4ws Prelude that had the same turning circumference as a non-4ws Prelude.
 
There are two things all men think they're good at. One of them is driving.

I know I'm not a talented driver. I'm easily distracted and I have poor depth perception and peripheral vision. My only advantage over the average schmuck behind the wheel is that I have some idea of what cars are actually capable of doing. I love stepping on the gas around the corner when I see all the cars around me lighting up their brake lights. But I'm more of an okay 8/10ths driver, not one of those car-control geniuses who can go 10/10ths.

And I'm a boring lay.
 
some easy mods and any vehicles turning radius can be improved. I'm not a mechanic and can't explain it, but read about it on the net. Might be limited to certain vehicles. Mainly involves increasing how far you can turn your tires. Don't want to turn too tight, start eating up a lot of rubber

Whiskey
 
Top Bottom