Just got back my latest blood test results.
I did things a little differently this time. I took it after doing my semi-annual course of HCG. It was 6 days after my last shot.
This was a suprise.
Although my balls were nice and full, my T was only 315! That aint great. It's about where it would be if I went off entirely. This puts a big bite in the ass about HCG's ablity to get endogenous T going. And what was more surprising is that my estrogen was 65! That's fucking HIGH bros!
Now last time I was tested my T was high/normal and when I used Chyrsin my e went down from slightly elevated to normal. Then I tried 6OXO and the results were the same. Were they still low from the use of Chrysin? Who knows? At any rate, I assumed 6OXO works as well. But I used a double dose of 6OXO during the course of HCG and obviously it didn't help much.
The problem here is, there are too many factors at play. Was the 6OXO just not effective? Would my e have been higher if I didn't use it. What would my e have been with the use of chrysin? I should have at least used Proviron but I didn't.
One thing this shows is that HCG raises e FAR HIGHER than exogenous testosterone. (At least in HRT dosages).
This had made me re-think the benefit of HCG. I was already of the belief that it was mostly cosmetic and this confirmed that notion further. But the surge in e was a bit of a shocker. I was lean while on it! (A sign of low e). Just goes to show you. There's no much that's unknown.
I'm going to do another blood test soon. But Now I'm spooked to use the 6OXO. If my T is around 900 (normal while on HRT) and my e is around 30 (normal with the daily use of chrysin) I'm going to leave well enough alone for a while.
Moral of the story: HCG may not be the wonder drug it's preported to be. The surge in T and e may give a nice boost in libido, and having big balls is a plus, but the side effects may not be worth it.
I did things a little differently this time. I took it after doing my semi-annual course of HCG. It was 6 days after my last shot.
This was a suprise.
Although my balls were nice and full, my T was only 315! That aint great. It's about where it would be if I went off entirely. This puts a big bite in the ass about HCG's ablity to get endogenous T going. And what was more surprising is that my estrogen was 65! That's fucking HIGH bros!
Now last time I was tested my T was high/normal and when I used Chyrsin my e went down from slightly elevated to normal. Then I tried 6OXO and the results were the same. Were they still low from the use of Chrysin? Who knows? At any rate, I assumed 6OXO works as well. But I used a double dose of 6OXO during the course of HCG and obviously it didn't help much.
The problem here is, there are too many factors at play. Was the 6OXO just not effective? Would my e have been higher if I didn't use it. What would my e have been with the use of chrysin? I should have at least used Proviron but I didn't.
One thing this shows is that HCG raises e FAR HIGHER than exogenous testosterone. (At least in HRT dosages).
This had made me re-think the benefit of HCG. I was already of the belief that it was mostly cosmetic and this confirmed that notion further. But the surge in e was a bit of a shocker. I was lean while on it! (A sign of low e). Just goes to show you. There's no much that's unknown.
I'm going to do another blood test soon. But Now I'm spooked to use the 6OXO. If my T is around 900 (normal while on HRT) and my e is around 30 (normal with the daily use of chrysin) I'm going to leave well enough alone for a while.
Moral of the story: HCG may not be the wonder drug it's preported to be. The surge in T and e may give a nice boost in libido, and having big balls is a plus, but the side effects may not be worth it.
Last edited: