Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

WHO do you think should be TIME'S MAN OF THE YEAR.

buksoon said:


Not so ubiquitous on this board! I expressed the criticism and RyanH became sarcasto-man and said I was suggesting FDR shoulda bombed the Japs earlier than he did. Which I wasn't, and my response about Elie Wiesel explained that with dignity, but anyway.
Buksoon...do you suspect that we provide a harsh environment for a woman who thinks independently? Seems that we do.
 
Test boy said:
Buksoon...do you suspect that we provide a harsh environment for a woman who thinks independently? Seems that we do.

OH HELL YES!!!

There was actually something interesting posted on Frackal's conspiracy/Afghanistan thread.

Everyone was rushing to commend Frackal on another excellent post. And then someone (not me, cause I never really read this woman's posts) said: "You know what? Strongchick said the same thing and it was like flame-a-palooza. She got slammed."

But I DO think women here saying stuff other than just offering themselves up sexually are either ignored or considered annoying by guys who wish they'd "get with the program."

It's not just a sex thing, because even the outed gay men do it--respond condescendingly, dismiss what is said.

Now the responses will be: "No, we condescend b/c you're dumb...." And so on..... Doesn't phase me.
 
RyanH. Your are a fucking asshole. You nominate some commie and give bullshit reasons not for Bush. So if that faggot gore was president, you would nominate him. Your moderator status should be revoked because you are stupid.
 
buksoon said:

But I DO think women here saying stuff other than just offering themselves up sexually are either ignored or considered annoying by guys who wish they'd "get with the program."

Yes but just by saying "guys" you are paint a broad stoke with the stereotype brush. Some of us "guys" actually listen to the point rather than the source.
 
buksoon said:


OH HELL YES!!!

There was actually something interesting posted on Frackal's conspiracy/Afghanistan thread.

Everyone was rushing to commend Frackal on another excellent post. And then someone (not me, cause I never really read this woman's posts) said: "You know what? Strongchick said the same thing and it was like flame-a-palooza. She got slammed."

But I DO think women here saying stuff other than just offering themselves up sexually are either ignored or considered annoying by guys who wish they'd "get with the program."

It's not just a sex thing, because even the outed gay men do it--respond condescendingly, dismiss what is said.

Now the responses will be: "No, we condescend b/c you're dumb...." And so on..... Doesn't phase me.
It seems to me that men and women like to torment one another.

I can easily visualize Frackal being commended for saying what strongchick got flamed for.

I have worked with co-workers that were predominantly female and I got treated poorly to a point. Works both ways I think. Why???....very good question.
 
buksoon said:


Not so ubiquitous on this board! I expressed the criticism and RyanH became sarcasto-man and said I was suggesting FDR shoulda bombed the Japs earlier than he did. Which I wasn't, and my response about Elie Wiesel explained that with dignity, but anyway.

That's cool, but may I meekly suggest that you engaged in a similar leap when you read my characterizing FDR in a particular context as a general statement about his value.
 
nenofury said:
RyanH. Your are a fucking asshole. You nominate some commie and give bullshit reasons not for Bush. So if that faggot gore was president, you would nominate him. Your moderator status should be revoked because you are stupid.
Here...here. RyanH is not an asshole. I actually think he has good intentions for the most part. I'm a conservative and I enjoy his thought provoking bullshit.:D
 
musclebrains said:


That's cool, but may I meekly suggest that you engaged in a similar leap when you read my characterizing FDR in a particular context as a general statement about his value.

Definitely! I was just sorta exasperated with the FDR praise on this board and when you said something that really had nothing to do with that, I just pounced. Not on you, per ce, but I took your post as a way to pounce on the opinions on some other threads.

Sorry. (Seriously.)
 
I want some of the guys to read the exchange Test Boy and I just had, a few posts up. Soooo true.
 
buksoon said:


OH HELL YES!!!

There was actually something interesting posted on Frackal's conspiracy/Afghanistan thread.

Everyone was rushing to commend Frackal on another excellent post. And then someone (not me, cause I never really read this woman's posts) said: "You know what? Strongchick said the same thing and it was like flame-a-palooza. She got slammed."

But I DO think women here saying stuff other than just offering themselves up sexually are either ignored or considered annoying by guys who wish they'd "get with the program."

It's not just a sex thing, because even the outed gay men do it--respond condescendingly, dismiss what is said.

Now the responses will be: "No, we condescend b/c you're dumb...." And so on..... Doesn't phase me.

Oh yeahhhhhhh. Strongchick was making all the points gympoppa is making now, too, and he's not getting called names and provoking a campaign to get him banned from Elite. I grant that timing is an issue here, but sexism is definitely at play. Recall, too, the sudden "shift" in posting about Strongchick when she uploaded her picture. Suddenly the Dragon Lady was a hot chick in a good many eyes.

As for the attitude of us "outed gay men" toward women, that would take about 10,000 words. But I will mention another sex/gender conflict -- that between good homos and bad homos.
 
Top Bottom