Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Top Chinese General warns U.S. over attack.

75th said:
In every instance when an argument is presented to you that is obviously one you cannot retort, automatically you are either drunk, sleeping, or prettying yourself up.

You would command a little more respect if you just admitted that, hey, you may be wrong. I do it all the time, and Im the most respected member of this board that my mom knows.
what can i say, i go out a lot :) and i usually pop onto EF after big nights out as i prep for sleep - and im not drunk, unless you consider under .05 BAC to be drunk, though i am very fatigued. as for the sleeping aspect, well, i love to snooze :) and also, you might want to consider that i am on the other side of the planet :)

and i dont pretty myself up. i just make myself prettier :)

and on that note, this wednesday night at 8:55pm...im going to go make myself prettier, and go out. ill be back later :)
 
GoldenDelicious said:
and if i were thinking about data in 1980 and the battlefield first aid available from then until the present day, as well as the advances in life support and trauma recovery over the same period, with their combined implications on combat trauma survival, particularly in the context of a marked improvement since the vietnam era, then simply imagining a graph of the likely survival rates vs chronological year from the vietnam era, through 1980, to present day, with the obvious assumption that the curve would be somewhat linear, or exponentially curved, upwards from vietnam through 2004 with 1980 at a midpoint between the two, then i would certainly think that the transition between the 1:4 and 1:11 dead:wounded ratio from vietnam to the present day would most certainly be applicable

but again, thats just me :)

its good to be me :)

Punctuation: another area of learning that you must have skipped due to your superior intelligence.

Try using puctuation next time to, like, make sentences and stuff.

And also, the line would certainly not be linear, and, LOL, definitely not exponentially curved UPWARDS.

If anything it woudl be asymptotic, and I'd wager we're well past the point of diminishing returns.

You've met your match and then some, goldengagonmycock. Retreat.
 
Lumberg said:
Punctuation: another area of learning that you must have skipped due to your superior intelligence.

Try using puctuation next time to, like, make sentences and stuff.

And also, the line would certainly not be linear, and, LOL, definitely not exponentially curved UPWARDS.

If anything it woudl be asymptotic, and I'd wager we're well past the point of diminishing returns.

You've met your match and then some, goldengagonmycock. Retreat.
punctuation is for people who need directions when they read :) if you cant keep up, slow down :)

and i would dispute that we are past the point of diminishing returns. rather, i would say that we are gaining momentum, and what with the establishment of pharmacogenomic technology and the emergence of proteomics (merely from a drug based point of view, let alone other technologies) i would certainly think that it would be curved upwards. the unravelling of the genome has opened the door to immortality, virtually. its easy to imagine the impact of such a thing on combat survival...though not for those who think, shall we say...linearly :)

and the only time i met my match tonight, i got a telephone number :)

cheerios :)
 
GoldenDelicious said:
punctuation is for people who need directions when they read :) if you cant keep up, slow down :)

and i would dispute that we are past the point of diminishing returns. rather, i would say that we are gaining momentum, and what with the establishment of pharmacogenomic technology and the emergence of proteomics (merely from a drug based point of view, let alone other technologies) i would certainly think that it would be curved upwards. the unravelling of the genome has opened the door to immortality, virtually. its easy to imagine the impact of such a thing on combat survival...though not for those who think, shall we say...linearly :)

and the only time i met my match tonight, i got a telephone number :)

cheerios :)

Don't you have a nap to take, or something social to go to so you can brag about it?

Shoo!
 
Lumberg said:
Don't you have a nap to take, or something social to go to so you can brag about it?

Shoo!
just came back actually :)

and i dont brag, i just like to fool around. it really is a pity (and im not being sarcastic for once) that you dont see that.
 
GoldenDelicious said:
and what with the establishment of pharmacogenomic technology and the emergence of proteomics (merely from a drug based point of view, let alone other technologies) i would certainly think that it would be curved upwards. the unravelling of the genome has opened the door to immortality, virtually
dude- did you pop those terms out of your latest time magazine... no wait, lets give you some credit... maybe nature...

you obviously have no clue... unravelling of the genome so far hasn't opened the door to immortality any more than Ponce de Leon did...

stop talking about shit you don't know anything about...

and if you want to argue this shit, which I am sure you obviously will... come with specific drugs, what gene they were designed to effect, and their mechanism of action and how people are now "virtually immortal" because of it... oh yeah, and post up some original research and personal insight you have into the area, and not some googled crap you wish to fillibuster with...

I am sure I or a handfull of other bros would enjoy pwning the shit out of you in this area too.
 
Top Bottom