Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 
PICK3
New member
wtf???
.jpg "Research Chemical Sciences")
.png "Research Chemical Sciences")
To Radar Lock or Not to Radar Lock?
- Thread starter pin
- Start date
wtf???
pin
Banned
Peoples Liberation Army (Chinese Army)
Manpower
Military age 18–49
Conscription None enforced
Available for military service 385,821,101 males, age 16–49 (2010 est),
363,789,674 females, age 16–49 (2010 est)
Fit for
military service 318,265,016 males, age 16–49 (2010 est),
300,323,611 females, age 16–49 (2010 est)
Reaching military
age annually 10,406,544 males (2010 est),
9,131,990 females (2010 est)
Active personnel approximately 2,285,000 [1][2] (ranked 1st)
Reserve personnel 800,000[1][2][3]
Deployed personnel Overseas: ~300 anti-pirate personnel in Somalia [1]
Paramilitary: approximately 1,500,000[1][2][4]
Total: 4,585,000~ [1][2] (ranked 6th)
American Army
Size 561,984 Active personnel
567,299 Reserve and National Guard personnel
1,129,283 total
redsamurai
Banned
pin
Banned
Actually I've been against The Free Trade Agreement and NAFTA from the start. Other countries should be able to find creative entrepreneurial ways to compete in a global capitalist market. Not make agreements that stifle American economic interests so that they can compete. Yes I am a capitalist. I think the problems with our economy are corporatism. Corporatism is a phenomenon that arose out of capitalism where a bunch of non producers invest in a company. Then employees work for peanuts to make more money for the non producers. I think there are other more positive ways capitalism could be used.
I think corporatism is the problem. If investors were also producers the current American economy would be more productive. Problem is in a capitalist free market people can use that free market however they choose. Which is the coolest part of a free market.
I gather you're a socialist? You do realize that socialism is communism light right? Same problem but at the other end of the income spectrum. Instead of having a bunch of wealthy non-producers, you have a welfare state with a bunch of low income non-producers.
Last edited:
redsamurai
Banned
you "gather" i'm socialist? you gathered wrong mate. If anything what you're suggesting smacks mildly of socialism. Had I written what you just wrote, that sackless gelding plunkey would have been in here within seconds posting something while rythmically twitching his asshole around a giant black dildo.
If you stopped for a moment and asked before jumping off the "jump to conclusions mat"....you would have found that I kind of agree with your assessment. I think you're 100% right about production.
pin
Banned
Sorry. I thought you were a socialist based on all of your posts, not just the ones in this thread.
Anyways this thread is about our allies getting into some gangster shit with, well... everybody.
redsamurai
Banned
technically if you beleive in any form of centralized governing authority, you are a socialist. Capitalism by definition, the Austrian's not mine, is the absence of any central convening authority. The purists don't beleive in any govt whatsoever. They make a strong point that either you have no govt whatsoever or just go ahead and be commies. They beleive in the slippery slope.
