pin
Banned
jerseyrugger76 said:I don't really have a position on ANWAR per se. Ann said it looked an awful lot like the moon and the Caribou seemed to enjoy the warmth. The pics seem to support that claim. Note I get all of my conservative info from Ann. She's the only one of you louts who's smart, hysterically funny, and easy on the eyes. She also has a phenomenal recipe for braised English short ribs. Anywho . . .
I've heard quotes that it will take 5 to 10 years (leaning towards 10) to get the oil from ANWAR into the markets. Let's assume 5 years. Markets look approximately 6 to 12 months into the future. So, it's not going to do shit for me today, as an investor or a consumer.
Let's assume that we do it anyway and drill 5 years from now. What then? Isn't it like saying to someone, "You know, since you're a smack addict, we'll fix the problem by giving you more heroin! Everything will be all better then."
Oil will never go away as an energy source. With oil sands in places like Canada, I don't think it should. But where is the comprehensive solution that is one part oil, one part wind, one part ethanol, one part solar, one part international relations, one part nuclear power (France gets about 82% of their power from nuclear sources, I'd do the same in a heart beat), and one part research (e.g. turning ocean wave motion into energy)? It's like solving a calculus equation subject to a constraint (the availability of oil).
Everyone is talking in false dichotomies: anwar or no anwar; oil or no oil. And it's total bullshit. You could drill from ANWAR to the center of the earth, but unless you take a holistic approach to solving the problem, it will never end.
My whole family works on the north slope. I like Ann Coulter too, but frankly she has never seen how fast an operation can go up.
This is exactly my point. The idea that it would take 10 years to get the oil to market is total crap. Its a political lie. Its manipulative. And it pisses those of us who know off. Don't believe the hype.