G
Gambino
Guest
panzer attak!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQ4ldl12W0I&mode=related&search=
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQ4ldl12W0I&mode=related&search=
I greatly enjoyed playing WIF 5th edition tabletop. They ruined the game in later editions IMO.Spartacus said:they're still working on the computer version of world in flames
when it's done we'll tangle
I don't care for the abstractness of hearts of iron
That's because civilian suffered relatively small casualties in WWI, unlike WWII.Testosterone boy said:
javaguru said:The Nazis were masters of propaganda films....
Closing ceremony, Triumph of the Will.hanselthecaretaker said:So are the Jews, lol.
What goes around...
javaguru said:Closing ceremony, Triumph of the Will.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=80lLU5-yji8
Many historians believe Rudolph Hess wrote most of Mein Kamph.
I've never read it, was it a translation or in German?hanselthecaretaker said:Apparently he dictated (what else? hehe) it to him while in prison, which would partially explain the ramblings and sometimes difficult-to-follow passages throughout.
I'll date the initial evolution to the Sturmtruppen which began in 1915 that were trained in Hutier tactics. They also made widespread use of defence in depth during WWI, arguably the best defence against maneuver combined arms warfare, later used to great success by the Soviet Army at Kursk in WWII.Spartacus said:I'm siding with javaguru
the germans birthed modern warfare
javaguru said:I've never read it, was it a translation or in German?
Considering WWII shaped the 20th century very understandable to consider it a must read. When I took the Theory of War at OSU we read "On War" by Clauswitz, "The Prince" by Machiavelli and "The Art of War" by Tsung Tsu.hanselthecaretaker said:I'm yet to read it myself. A 20 something kid I sat next to on my flight back from MN had it with him. He said he got weird looks from the airport staff lol. He said he was told it's one of history's must reads.
It is long and difficult to follow from what I understand though. In any case it's on my list of books to read.
Huh?heatherrae said:DAMN IT! No one laughed at my ottoman empire joke? WTF?
First page. One of my favorite jokes!javaguru said:Huh?
I was simply asking why you were youngguns'ing a thread....heatherrae said:First page. One of my favorite jokes!
javaguru said:Considering WWII shaped the 20th century very understandable to consider it a must read. When I took the Theory of War at OSU we read "On War" by Clauswitz, "The Prince" by Machiavelli and "The Art of War" by Tsung Tsu.
Ya know, you're right..combined arms does include airpower as a major player.jnuts said:What, no airpower discussion?
You know the response, airpower is support.jnuts said:What, no airpower discussion?
javaguru said:Ya know, you're right..combined arms does include airpower as a major player.
They coined knights of the air for a reason...warriors on all sides.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-klyiFhkLfk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8oA9zy-qtxA
Tell me that footage doesn't give you chills. It disturbs me to see Americans dying, greatly, but we all fought for the same things.
They fight for the state.....and nationalism....freedom is a discouraged variable.test boy ii said:Everybody fights for freedom.
Reading/regurgitating and analyzing are different. I had to make a presentation,in a graduate level only class in arguably the best military history program of the time as an undergrad.This presentation was based on the multiple works I read. I recited "The Prince" in high school for my advanced history class and debunked it back then. His treatment of mercenaries is contradictory of real world results, they often performed better than resident conscripts. On the other hand, Clausewitz does define the western way of war. Go stick your dick up your ass. Don't fuck with me on military history or I'll make you my prison bitch......without lube.test boy ii said:The Prince takes about 30 minutes to read.
Shoot....I'll bet that Bush even read that book.
heatherrae said:How about that ottoman empire boys? Get it? They sat around with their feet up. Get it?
Spartacus said:On the 16th of October 1942, Colonel-General Sanne decorated Croatian Sergeant Dragutin Podobnik with the Iron Cross 1st Class for extreme heroism during the taking of the Red October factory on the 30th of September. Colonel Pavicic is also decorated with this medal for his excellent leadership of the Regiment.
During the remaining days of October 1942 the Regiment fought hard and its losses accumulated. The Red October factory was continously the center of fighting during this time. A Soviet counter-attack along the railway tracks near the Red October factory was just barely contained, and Russian civilians were even seen shooting Croatian and German soldiers, prompting an order to fire indescriminately on all civilians found in the battle zone. October 31st 1942 was spent defending Building number ten of the Red October factory.
On November 3rd 1942, the 369th Regiment had the following troops still available: 1 infantry company with 98 men and 8 light machine-guns, a heavy machine-gun company with 73 men and one operational heavy machine-gun, and an anti-tank company with 20 men and 6 cannon - only enough men to serve two! The total remaining Croatian soldiers was 191. Of this, only 4 were officers. This number does not include the artillery battery, whose men and weapons were scattered throughout various German units. On the 4th of November, a battalion of replacements arrived from Stokerau, but even these much needed men barely made the "reinforced regiment" a reinforced battalion!
On the 6th of November the remains of the unit were attached to the German 212th Infantry Regiment. Fighting continued in and around the Red October factory. On November 21st 1942, news of a Soviet attack on the flanks of the 6.Armee was heard. By November 25th 1942, the lines being held by the Regiment were so thinly manned that Soviet scouts were able to pass through poritions of the front into the Gemran rear. Every available man, including the sick and lightly wounded, were therefore sent to hold the line.
There were 5 officers, 9 NCO's and 110 soldiers left fighting at the end of November, 1942. Food was carefully rationed and consists of 120 grams of horse meat per meal along with some bread. Of the 3 daily meals, only one was considered large, and this consisted of only 1/2 of the required amount to sustain troops from day-to-day.
As December arrived, the few remaining Croatian soldiers were frozen, hungry and in the midst of a general lack of ammunition and weapons. The commanding officer, Colonel Pavicic, was by now living in his own world writing out irrelevant daily orders to troops and units that no longer existed. On the 17th of December, the Volga River froze over allowing the Soviets to open another front on that side of the city as well.
On Christmas Day, 1942, Lt. Korobkin wrote:
"...Today, December 25, 1942, around noon, the enemy attacked from Building number 4 into Building number 2 (Red October Factory), which is our left flank. The enemy fought his way into number 2. Our defenders are under constant fire from the 'small white house' accross from Building number 2. A cannon shot by the enemy has destroyed our heavy machine-gun. At the same time as this attack on our left flank, the enemy attacked our right flank. Despite cross-fire and artillery support, this attack was thrown back. This success is mostly due to the heroism of Corporal Ivan Vadlje. In the evening we received a message from Lt.-Colonel Eichler, congratulating us for holding out. When night fell, we took advantage of the dark, and counter-attacked on our left flank. Using hand grenades, we destroyed the enemy unit, and re-took our previous positions. Lt-Colonel Eichler, upon hearing of this success, sent us a new message, in which he says that the Grenadiers of the 212th Regiment are proud to have warriors like us Croats in their midst. Sergeants Ante Martinovic and Franjo Filcic were killed in this counter-attack. 12 men are wounded."
On January 10th, 1943, Colonel Pavicic, in his report to the 100.Jäger-Division, wrote:
"I must say that, in the period from September 27, 1942, when we arrived at Stalingrad, till today, my men have had only 4 days of rest. The last day of rest, on the 30th of December for 24 hours, was insufficient even for required sleep, as after 3 days and nights of constant battles in and around the Red October, they were so over-tired, that they slept like they were dead, and never even had time to wash, shave, or cut their hair. Immediately after this short rest, they were again thrown into the thick of battle, holding a small salient in our lines. They held this position until the 9th of January, 1943, when they were pulled back into our current position. We are under attack here again today."
On the 16th of January 1943, the Soviets launched an attack from three sides of the Croatian positions. They were pushed several streets back and a group led by Lt. Fiember was cut off. Under heavy attack, this group ran out of ammunition and was later over-run. Lt.Colonel Kuhlwein attempted to save young Fiember and his men by counter-attacking, but all of the men of this attack were killed, including Lt.-Colonel Kuhlwein. Lieutenants Zubcevski, Korobkin and Vadlja, with a few surviving soldiers, continued to battle against this Soviet attack and soon all three were seriously wounded. The German command then ordered that the last survivng Croats be pulled from the battle lines and be employed in digging fortification lines around the former Soviet Airforce Academy, which would serve as the last defense point of the unit.
Shortly after, Colonel Pavicic requested from the 100.Jäger-Division that he be replaced. As he has no more men, just a few wounded, he felt he was useless. He suggested that Lt.-Colonel Mesic (Commander of the artillery battery) replace him, and that he (Pavicic) be flown out of Stalingrad back to Stokerau where a German-Croatian Division was being formed to fight the partisans in the Balkans (This would be the 369th "Devil's" Division, see below). On the 20th of January 1943, Colonel Pavicic attempted to fly out of Stalingrad. It is a complete mystery what happened to him. Two possibilites exist, one that his plane was shot down and the other that he had attempted to leave without the orders of the Divisional Command and was executed in those last mad days of the Stalingrad pocket. The former is more likely the truth, as there is a witness (Sergeant Ervin Juric) amongst the surviving Croatians that claims to have seen the orders arrive for Pavicic from General Sanne.
On the 23rd of January 1943, 18 wounded Croatians were flown out of Stalingrad. They were the last Croatians to leave Stalingalive. Amongst these lucky souls was Croatian Sergeant Juric, who wrote and carried with him to safety the Kriegstagbuch (unit war diary) of the 369th Reinforced Regiment, thereby saving for posterity the ultimate memorial to these brave men. The only entry in the diary after January 23rd 1943 is "February 2, 1943, Stalingrad has fallen".
Lt.-Colonel Mesic remained in Stalingrad after January 23rd 1943 with the few surviving men of the Regiment. Most died in the desperate battles at the end. Mesic and a handfull of soldiers survived and surrendered to the Soviets. They were forced to walk with no warm clothes and no food, all the way to Moscow. Here, they were thrown into a fenced field where they had to dig holes in the snow for protection from the elements. They were fed once a day and in 1945, Mesic was sent to Yugoslavia where the Communists government had him liquidated.
The remnants of the 369th that had been evacuated by air from Stalingrad due to wounds, sickness, etc, were sent to Stockerau where they alongside the replacement battalion of the former Regiment, formed the core of a new Croatian infantry unit, the 369th Vrazja Division, or Devil's Division. There were approximately 1,000 of these former veterans of the original Croatian Regiment. They were all awarded a special honor badge called the "Croatian Legion Badge - 1941" shaped as a Linden leaf with the Croat checkerboard and the words "Hrvatska Legija - 1941" on it.
"Lt.-Colonel Mesic remained in Stalingrad after January 23rd 1943 with the few surviving men of the Regiment. Most died in the desperate battles at the end. Mesic and a handfull of soldiers survived and surrendered to the Soviets. They were forced to walk with no warm clothes and no food, all the way to Moscow. Here, they were thrown into a fenced field where they had to dig holes in the snow for protection from the elements. They were fed once a day and in 1945, Mesic was sent to Yugoslavia where the Communists government had him liquidated."hanselthecaretaker said:Hell yeah, I'm roughly half Croat myself.
Spartacus said:make's you wonder why so many foreign volunteers fought so effectively for the third reich
I've just highlighted the spanish and the croatians
the belgians and dutch fielded outstanding divisions for the reich also
the romanians and hungarians fought well on the eastern front too
the Italian's sent a whole corps to the eastern front
that was the big dance for the entire history of mankind
never again will two superpowers clash like the soviets and germany
tough callhanselthecaretaker said:Do you think Germany could've pulled it off without having to deal with the U.S./British on the western front, and their aid to the Soviets?
Spartacus said:tough call
if germany had captured moscow and thus divide the USSR effectively in two (moscow was a major key transit center) in 1941 or early-mid 1942
and finish off the north half and leningrad
then bring the full strength of the wehrmacht to the south and basically mop up
and end the war in the east before the winter of 1942
no way the USA and Britian get back into mainland europe
mighty if though
they got damn close to moscow and arguably only the severe winter(worst winter in around a 100years) saved moscow
Barbarossa was delayed because Hitler had to clean up the Italian cluster fuck in Yugoslavia and Greece. Mussolini invaded Yugoslavia and Greece but was getting his ass kicked. It delayed the invasion of the Soviet Union by four weeks, it may have cost Germany the Eastern Front.hanselthecaretaker said:I read somewhere that they could've taken Moscow earlier if they had access to come in from the south. I think it had something to do with Yugoslavia and Britain conflict that prevented it. Damn I wish I remember where that article was.
not sure what you speak ofhanselthecaretaker said:I read somewhere that they could've taken Moscow earlier if they had access to come in from the south. I think it had something to do with Yugoslavia and Britain conflict that prevented it. Damn I wish I remember where that article was.
javaguru said:Barbarossa was delayed because Hitler had to clean up the Italian cluster fuck in Yugoslavia and Greece. Mussolini invaded Yugoslavia and Greece but was getting his ass kicked. It delayed the invasion of the Soviet Union by four weeks, it may have cost Germany the Eastern Front.
Spartacus said:The original blitzkrieg invasion plan, which the Axis called Operation Barbarossa, had called for the capture of Moscow within three to four months. However, despite large initial advances, the Wehrmacht was soon slowed by Soviet resistance (in particular during the Battle of Smolensk, which lasted from July through September 1941 and delayed the German offensive towards Moscow for two months). Having secured Smolensk, the Wehrmacht was forced to consolidate its lines around Leningrad and Kiev, further delaying the drive towards Moscow. The Axis advance was finally renewed on September 30, 1941, with an offensive codenamed Operation Typhoon, the goal of which was the capture of Moscow before the onset of winter.
After a successful initial advance leading to the encirclement and destruction of several Soviet armies, the German offensive was stopped by Soviet resistance at the Mozhaisk defensive line, just 120 km (75 mi) from the capital. Having penetrated the Soviet defenses, the Wehrmacht offensive was slowed by weather conditions, with autumn rains turning roads and fields into thick mud that significantly impeded Axis vehicles, horses, and soldiers. Although the onset of colder weather and the freezing of the ground allowed the Axis advance to continue, it continued to struggle in the face of the severe cold and stiffening Soviet resistance.
By early December, the lead German Panzer Groups stood less than 30 kilometers (19 mi) from the Kremlin, and Wehrmacht officers were able to see some of Moscow's buildings with binoculars; but, handicapped by cold and exhausted troops, the Axis forces were unable to make further advances. On December 5, 1941, fresh Soviet Siberian troops, prepared for winter warfare, attacked the German forces in front of Moscow; by January 1942, the Wehrmacht had been driven back 100 to 250 km (60 to 150 mi), ending the immediate threat to Moscow and marking the closest that Axis forces ever got to capturing the Soviet capital.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Moscow
Mussolini was to Hitler as that idiot friend we always have to bail out of trouble is to us.hanselthecaretaker said:Ahhh yes it was Mussolini and Greece. Thanks bro.
javaguru said:Mussolini was to Hitler as that idiot friend we always have to bail out of trouble is to us.
A musical?hanselthecaretaker said:Only they're dictators, which would make a funny comedy sketch.

it's popular to call Hitler a dumbass for invading the USSRhanselthecaretaker said:The word "ambitious" comes to mind.
Would've torn communism a new one. Hell, it might've eventually ended it, from a governmental standpoint at least.
Spartacus said:it's popular to call Hitler a dumbass for invading the USSR
but I disagree due to 3 major points
point one
in world war one the germans embarrassed the russians and pushed them around and stomped their ass
point two
when the soviets invaded Finland in 1940 they were again embarrassed with outnumbered and out-equiped Finns again stomping the superior soviets
point three
the germans and their blitzkrieg had excelled thus far in the war
Poland put up a good fight,but succumbed in a month
france with the help of the BEF fell in 6 weeks
but the battle of france was over in a month
the germans wiped out yugoslavia in 2 weeks
greece fell relatively easily too
so really Hitler had plenty of reasons to believe he could topple communist USSR in a two season campaign
not to mention his whole reason for starting the war was to expand Germany east and wipe out the bolsheviks/communists
it was a pan-european crusade against communism
with 1-2 million foreign volunteers joining the cause
javaguru said:Reading/regurgitating and analyzing are different. I had to make a presentation,in a graduate level only class in arguably the best military history program of the time as an undergrad.This presentation was based on the multiple works I read. I recited "The Prince" in high school for my advanced history class and debunked it back then. His treatment of mercenaries is contradictory of real world results, they often performed better than resident conscripts. On the other hand, Clausewitz does define the western way of war. Go stick your dick up your ass. Don't fuck with me on military history or I'll make you my prison bitch......without lube.[/QUOTE]
You are pretty proud of studying history for reasons unknown to many.
hanselthecaretaker said:Sadly to 99% of the world he was just an evil jew-hater. These same people probably fail to realize how many jews were also commies.
It wasn't just anti-semetism. He was bent on world domination. He admitted that he would never quit until he ruled the world. So, he had Germany on a course for destruction from day one.Gambino said:why is it sad though?
if hitler wasn't so anti-semtic i think his other accomplishiments would looked at in a different light...
heatherrae said:It wasn't just anti-semetism. He was bent on world domination. He admitted that he would never quit until he ruled the world. So, he had Germany on a course for destruction from day one.
Actually, he did intend to wipe them out altogether. He came out with a memoir after Mein Kampf [sp?] in which he clearly stated that he wanted to dominate Europe and then take on America. He stated that he believed that Americans were even genetically superior to the Germans because they were the brightest, most adventurous, and physically superior of all who came over here. He said that he wanted to do it right away before America became even more strong.Gambino said:def overreaching and logistically impossible
an euro empire would've been hard enough to keep together
imagine all the rebellions you'd have over the yrs
but the german way of life, perscribed by hitler, wouldn't have been all death and destruction...he never intended to wipe out the french or brit peeps all together...they would've been incorporated into the reich.
as far as being conuquered goes, as long as you weren't jew/gypsy/slav/pole/etc...greater germany could've been a great society (hypothetical, but of course)
i think in his racial hiearchy brits and french would get a passheatherrae said:Actually, he did intend to wipe them out altogether. He came out with a memoir after Mein Kampf [sp?] in which he clearly stated that he wanted to dominate Europe and then take on America. He stated that he believed that Americans were even genetically superior to the Germans because they were the brightest, most adventurous, and physically superior of all who came over here. He said that he wanted to do it right away before America became even more strong.
He held off from publishing the book for obvious reasons. He didn't want everyone in the world to know that his plan was so far reaching. He wanted the element of surprise.
Now, the book has been uncovered and discussed quite a bit as of late. Sorry that I can't recall the title. I saw it on the history channel.
Spartacus said:it's popular to call Hitler a dumbass for invading the USSR
but I disagree due to 3 major points
point one
in world war one the germans embarrassed the russians and pushed them around and stomped their ass
point two
when the soviets invaded Finland in 1940 they were again embarrassed with outnumbered and out-equiped Finns again stomping the superior soviets
point three
the germans and their blitzkrieg had excelled thus far in the war
Poland put up a good fight,but succumbed in a month
france with the help of the BEF fell in 6 weeks
but the battle of france was over in a month
the germans wiped out yugoslavia in 2 weeks
greece fell relatively easily too
so really Hitler had plenty of reasons to believe he could topple communist USSR in a two season campaign
not to mention his whole reason for starting the war was to expand Germany east and wipe out the bolsheviks/communists
it was a pan-european crusade against communism
with 1-2 million foreign volunteers joining the cause
Gambino said:why is it sad though?
if hitler wasn't so anti-semtic i think his other accomplishiments would looked at in a different light...
heatherrae said:It wasn't just anti-semetism. He was bent on world domination. He admitted that he would never quit until he ruled the world. So, he had Germany on a course for destruction from day one.
Spartacus said:http://www.feldgrau.com/articles.php?ID=13
The Croatian 369th Reinforced Regiment
On the day of the German invasion of the Soviet Union, June 22, 1941, the "Poglavnik" (Leader) of the Independant State of Croatia, Ante Pavelic, met with the military and civilian leadership of Croatia to decide how best to support their German ally. All present were strongly in favour of the German attack, seeing the invasion as a battle between the progressive forces of Europe against the Communist forces in the East. All present agreed that Croatia should participate in the invasion alongside Germany. To this end the representative of the German military in Croatia, Edmund Glaise von Horstenau, was contacted.
Von Horstenau suggested that Pavelic prepare a letter to Adolf Hitler, offering the service of Croatian troops on the Eastern Front. Pavelic prepared this letter the following day, on June 23rd, 1941. In his letter, Pavelic explained to Hitler the wishes of the Croatian people to join the battle of "all freedom loving nations against Communism". Pavelic offered ground, sea and air forces, to be committed "as soon as possible" to fight alongside Germany. Hitler responded to Pavelic's letter on July 1st 1941, accepting the Croatian offer and thanking them for their service. Hitler was of the opinion that ground forces could be sent quickly, while air and sea forces would need a longer time to be properly trained and equiped. On July 2nd, 1941, Pavelic ordered that volunteers be called for from all branches of the Armed Forces of Croatia to join the struggle in the East.
The ground contingent of the planned Croatian formations was the first to be formed. The Croatians hoped for a total of 3,900 volunteers in order to form a regimental sized unit, but by the 15th of July 1941, 9,000 men had already stepped forward and volunteered for service! In light of such high numbers the criteria for acceptance was raised considerably.
Spartacus said:I'm about 25% croatian so this section is appealing to me
Your honor, basis....heatherrae said:Actually, he did intend to wipe them out altogether. He came out with a memoir after Mein Kampf [sp?] in which he clearly stated that he wanted to dominate Europe and then take on America. He stated that he believed that Americans were even genetically superior to the Germans because they were the brightest, most adventurous, and physically superior of all who came over here. He said that he wanted to do it right away before America became even more strong.
He held off from publishing the book for obvious reasons. He didn't want everyone in the world to know that his plan was so far reaching. He wanted the element of surprise.
Now, the book has been uncovered and discussed quite a bit as of late. Sorry that I can't recall the title. I saw it on the history channel.
Testosterone boy said:I'm a historian...read historical text in context as opposed to superficially and don't tell me shit unless you're educated.. Just sayin', Armchair retards are a dime a dozen...javaguru said:Reading/regurgitating and analyzing are different. I had to make a presentation,in a graduate level only class in arguably the best military history program of the time as an undergrad.This presentation was based on the multiple works I read. I recited "The Prince" in high school for my advanced history class and debunked it back then. His treatment of mercenaries is contradictory of real world results, they often performed better than resident conscripts. On the other hand, Clausewitz does define the western way of war. Go stick your dick up your ass. Don't fuck with me on military history or I'll make you my prison bitch......without lube.[/QUOTE]
You are pretty proud of studying history for reasons unknown to many.
their favorite topic.Hitler wanted german hegemony over europe and to expand the german empire to the east at the expense of the sovietsheatherrae said:It wasn't just anti-semetism. He was bent on world domination. He admitted that he would never quit until he ruled the world. So, he had Germany on a course for destruction from day one.
the germans encountered similar problems as us in Iraqdomoljub said:jugoslavia, the old one did not put up a fight in most parts. croatia and slovenia and hercegovina welcomed the german army as a liberating army.
Modern Marvels is their favorite topic.......fistfullofsteel said:this turned into the history channel. always talking about hitler and nazis.their favorite topic.
javaguru said:I'm a historian...read historical text in context as opposed to superficially and don't tell me shit unless you're educated.. Just sayin', Armchair retards are a dime a dozen...
how do you get a BS in history?Testosterone boy said:You have a BS in history, you have told us at least 20 times.
Your veneer of having some class is thin.
I never claimed to have class, I prefer to be classless. I have a BA in History.....I'm with Gambino, how do you get a BS in history?Testosterone boy said:You have a BS in history, you have told us at least 20 times.
Your veneer of having some class is thin.
Well, really my original point is that a leader bent on world domination is a leader that is leading his country into ruin. There really are no positive things to say about what he did for Germany. In the end, his entire plan lead them into great destruction.hanselthecaretaker said:That's basically what I mean.
Hitler's minister of propaganda, Joseph Goebels, mentioned the same thing in his diaries, about "ruling the world". Although like Gambino said, physically taking over every developed nation even in that time would be next to impossible. The Germans were ambitious, but not stupid. A more rational explanation would be spreading nationalism, first and foremost in the place of communist controlled states.
A lot of Nazi Germany has been over-villainized. Historians (including some Jewish) have been debunking horror stories more and more as time goes on, concentration camp numbers being downplayed, etc. It was a chaotic time.
Hitler was convinced World War II would not have occurred had it not been for Jewish influence. Hitler regarded Germany's struggle with Great Britain and the United States as a disaster for western civilization and a triumph for Communism. He knew that President Roosevelt had worked with every available means to promote war in Europe prior to the English declaration of war against Germany on September 3, 1939. He did not believe that Chamberlain would have accepted war had it not been for the pressure from President Roosevelt. Further, Hitler did not believe that President Roosevelt would have worked for war had be not been encouraged and supported in his efforts by the powerful American-Jewish community.
Joachin von Ribbentrop, Between London and Moscow, Leoni, 1953, pp. 274ff.)
What do you know about baby barbeque?heatherrae said:Well, really my original point is that a leader bent on world domination is a leader that is leading his country into ruin. There really are no positive things to say about what he did for Germany. In the end, his entire plan lead them into great destruction.
Discussing what he achieved for Germany is like saying "Yes, but I kissed the baby before I threw it into the barbeque pit."
heatherrae said:Well, really my original point is that a leader bent on world domination is a leader that is leading his country into ruin. There really are no positive things to say about what he did for Germany. In the end, his entire plan lead them into great destruction.
Discussing what he achieved for Germany is like saying "Yes, but I kissed the baby before I threw it into the barbeque pit."
mein kampf has been "out there" since 1925 so your comments about it be newly discovered is flat out wrongheatherrae said:Well, really my original point is that a leader bent on world domination is a leader that is leading his country into ruin. There really are no positive things to say about what he did for Germany. In the end, his entire plan lead them into great destruction.
Discussing what he achieved for Germany is like saying "Yes, but I kissed the baby before I threw it into the barbeque pit."
You must have misread what I typed. I was talking about an unpublished work that was written by Hitler after mein kampf. Go back and reread what I wrote.Spartacus said:mein kampf has been "out there" since 1925 so your comments about it be newly discovered is flat out wrong
anyhow mein kampf was largely ramblings etc. and much like sports talk it contained a lot of "bullshitting"
in actaulity Hitler was not bent on world domination,just a uniting of germanic peoples into one tough ass country;
"Hitler makes arguments toward the old German nationalist ideas of "Drang nach Osten" and the necessity to gain Lebensraum ("living space") eastwards (especially in Russia).
In Mein Kampf, Hitler uses the main thesis of "The Jewish peril", which speaks of an alleged Jewish conspiracy to gain world leadership and also warns against the French. Overall, however, it does explain many details of Hitler's childhood and the process by which he became increasingly anti-Semitic and militaristic, especially during his years in Vienna, Austria. In one early chapter, he wrote about how for the first time in the city streets he noticed distinctively dressed Jews unlike those he already knew and then asked himself "Was that a German?" rather than "Was that a Jew?"
Mein Kampf has also been studied as a work on political theory. For example, Hitler announces his hatred in Mein Kampf toward what he believed to be the twin evils of the world: Communism and Judaism. The new territory that Germany needed to obtain would properly nurture the "historic destiny" of the German people; this goal explains why Hitler invaded Europe, both East and West, before he launched his attack against Russia. Laying Germany's chief ills on the parliamentary government, he announces that he wants to completely destroy that type of government.
Mein Kampf has been examined as a book on foreign policy. For example, Hitler predicts the stages of Germany's political reality on the world stage: in the first stage, Germany would, through a massive program of re-armament, overthrow the shackles of the Treaty of Versailles and form alliances with the British Empire and Fascist Italy. The second stage would feature wars against France and her allies in Eastern Europe by the combined forces of Germany, Britain and Italy. The third and final stage would be a war to destroy what Hitler saw as the "Judeo-Bolshevik" regime in the Soviet Union that would give Germany the necessary Lebensraum. The German historian, Andreas Hillgruber, labelled the plans contained in Mein Kampf as Hitler's "Stufenplan" (Stage-by-stage plan)."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mein_Kampf
Baby monkey bbq only.javaguru said:What do you know about baby barbeque?
Well, thank you for the insults. Who knew that Hitler would incite such rousing ferver in your little heart...lol. Yes, I'm an educated adult who is aware that he built nice roads and was an architecture nut. In the end, however, he destroyed the country and Germans to this day are ashamed of his reign of terror. Giving him any credit as a great leader is ridiculous. He was a butcher and a monster.hanselthecaretaker said:Wow. Do you have any idea what Germany was like before he came into the picture? I suppose not; they never taught that part in junior high. Catch em while they're young, for sure.
OMFGBABYBBQ?heatherrae said:Baby monkey bbq only.
butcher's and monsters still have their positive impactheatherrae said:Well, thank you for the insults. Who knew that Hitler would incite such rousing ferver in your little heart...lol. Yes, I'm an educated adult who is aware that he built nice roads and was an architecture nut. In the end, however, he destroyed the country and Germans to this day are ashamed of his reign of terror. Giving him any credit as a great leader is ridiculous. He was a butcher and a monster.
the autobahn and the "people's car" VW to startheatherrae said:Well, really my original point is that a leader bent on world domination is a leader that is leading his country into ruin. There really are no positive things to say about what he did for Germany.
No, it isn't an emotional decision. It is looking at the end result of his reign. The country was in ruins, and is still embarassed by him. I feel the end result cannot be compared to Alexander. Alexander was far more effective a leader, even if he was completely egocentric, sexually ambivalent and delusional...lol.Gambino said:butcher's and monsters still have their positive impact
alexander, for instance, wasn't always nice about how he did things
neither was mohammed or stalin or mao
but to dissmiss their reigns entirely is emotion driven and not logical IMO
Hitler didn't write any memoirs(he was sort of dead)heatherrae said:You must have misread what I typed. I was talking about an unpublished work that was written by Hitler after mein kampf. Go back and reread what I wrote.
No, this one is by Hitler himself. If you think it is fake, that is one thing. But, purportedly by the historians who were featured on History channel, it exists. I didn't hear the story incorrectly and remember what was said very well. Perhaps google the story from the history channel for more info on what I am talking about.Spartacus said:Hitler didn't write any memoirs(he was sort of dead)
I beleive the book your talking about is just another "I was there with Hitler" book that's nothing but an opinion piece
and usually those are the typical "hitler was a bully and evil" tripe
if you really want to understand Hitler via the observations of a man who was there
read Albert Speer's "Inside the Third Reich" or his "Spandau Diaries"
I read them both at age 14-15
Albert Speer was a genious
the country got destroyed because they lostheatherrae said:Well, thank you for the insults. Who knew that Hitler would incite such rousing ferver in your little heart...lol. Yes, I'm an educated adult who is aware that he built nice roads and was an architecture nut. In the end, however, he destroyed the country and Germans to this day are ashamed of his reign of terror. Giving him any credit as a great leader is ridiculous. He was a butcher and a monster.
This page contains mature content. By continuing, you confirm you are over 18 and agree to our TOS and User Agreement.
Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 










