Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

The end (war thread)

redguru said:
We all know you klansmen can't shoot. Hell, you hide behind sheets and mask your identity. Cowards, one and all, as you sit behind your keyboard spewing hate.


Most Klansmen are Christian numb-nuts.

Most Skinheads are disgruntled unaware children.

I on the other hand am an enlightened human being.

American Idol is calling you....go text your vote. When the final days do come I will let you live....Only to dig the graves for the worthless dead ones you worship. :chesty:
 
alien amp pharm said:
So you believe your politically correct and corrupt government will keep you safe?

I sure don't have faith in it.

To me personally it's not about paranoia but a matter of being prepared instead. I see nothing wrong with that.


my case against paranoia, is primarily for the reason that it can exploited. Now i sure don't have faith in the government, as a matter of fact I am very much against anything that excercises any kind of control or power over me, for I am an evolved intelligent being. I don't need the incentive of institutions, jails and punishments to refrain me from commiting crimes and impinge on rights of my fellow human beings. I don't require it. My intelligence is offended by this government.

In words of my hero Henry Thoreau, "A government is best when it governs least or better yet, a government is best when it doesn't governs at all."

Regardless, my arguement is against fear. When instilled with fear, your are more willing to trade your freedom for security. And your individual freedom is most precious. This enables the few in power to excercise control effortlessly and treat you like a puppet. The issue is not of anything moral or righteous here. The issue is of power.

I cannot really conclude that my peeps here on this thread are in error. For they are right as there is threat, but surely an induced threat by the US government. If people fail to percieve this, then are lacking in cognitive faculties. It is ridiculous that some of you seemingly encourage a terrorist attack on your people and in your country. This is just vain. You see far, but you don't see far enough. You have an opinion, but your opinion does not favour you, your individual.

For example, it is unintelligent to have opinions such as some expressed in this thread. For such opinions are suitable for those who have some sort of incentive of power and are in a postion of authority. But you are just an individual. All you are entitled to is your freedom and that is all that you have to defend. But you side with those who want to exploit the very one thing you should hold most precious. And for what? You have no incentive to hold such an opinion. Why should you trade your freedom for security, with a government, you know is corrupt and in essence impotent? Maybe it is an ego issue and nothing else. Maybe you would like to feel important because only important people hold such opinions. The first truth is that it is not necessary to be important. First understand that. Then understand that you are not important. Because important people are the ones that have power and must control to obtain power. Then drop that nonsensical opinion.

Stop thinking like a politician or an army commander. You are neither. You are a free human being! For once, think for your own good.
 
mkazzbmf said:
Most Klansmen are Christian numb-nuts.

Most Skinheads are disgruntled unaware children.

I on the other hand am an enlightened human being.

American Idol is calling you....go text your vote. When the final days do come I will let you live....Only to dig the graves for the worthless dead ones you worship. :chesty:

I'm the descendant of Ghetto Poles, I have relatives that participated in the uprisings during WW2, and others that died in concentration camps. We are not Jewish, but Catholic and Non-Jewish Pole were also killed by the millions in concentration camps. I wouldn't take the time out of my day to piss on you if you were on fire. W dupie byles, gowno widziales.
 
mightymouse69 said:
not at all, fear is worrying about things that probably wont' happen. taking swift action is for those that know it will happen, just when is the question.

I bet you don't know one person who has died violently, where I know dozens...don't lecture me boy.


It is true that i am a boy, compared to you. And i truely respect you because you are worthy of it. But, i was born in afghanistan, right in the middle of Russian Afghan war. My first memories are of birds eating rotten bodies by the road sides, Ruski Tanks, bloody red glares of fire dominating a portion of the sky, and fearing for my father life as i knew that he was in the middle of it all. There was a funeral every weekend, rocket attacks, neighbours dyeing, buzz of russian airplanes wouldn't let me sleep all night. This is only a bit of my very voilent childhood. I have seen enough for a lifetime.
 
Subzeero said:
It is true that i am a boy, compared to you. And i truely respect you because you are worthy of it. But, i was born in afghanistan, right in the middle of Russian Afghan war. My first memories are of birds eating rotten bodies by the road sides, Ruski Tanks, bloody red glares of fire dominating a portion of the sky, and fearing for my father life as i knew that he was in the middle of it all. There was a funeral every weekend, rocket attacks, neighbours dyeing, buzz of russian airplanes wouldn't let me sleep all night. This is only a bit of my very voilent childhood. I have seen enough for a lifetime.

damn maing, that's heavy
 
Subzeero said:
bro, so you suggest that we live in fear and paranoia for the rest of our lives to make sure western civilization exists? Thats BS man, sorry. I mean, you are suggesting that we become more paranoid than we already are?

What about living a good free life bro?
No one is suggesting "fear and paranoia".

I for one, am suggesting that the US have a national debate on proactive versus reactive foreign policy. We can either react to terrorist attacks or we can proactively try to take-out rogue regeimes. It should be among our top 1-2 issues right now and once we make the decision, we should build a foreign policy strategy that pursues the chosen goal.
 
Subzeero said:
my case against paranoia, is primarily for the reason that it can exploited. Now i sure don't have faith in the government, as a matter of fact I am very much against anything that excercises any kind of control or power over me, for I am an evolved intelligent being. I don't need the incentive of institutions, jails and punishments to refrain me from commiting crimes and impinge on rights of my fellow human beings. I don't require it. My intelligence is offended by this government.

In words of my hero Henry Thoreau, "A government is best when it governs least or better yet, a government is best when it doesn't governs at all."

Regardless, my arguement is against fear. When instilled with fear, your are more willing to trade your freedom for security. And your individual freedom is most precious. This enables the few in power to excercise control effortlessly and treat you like a puppet. The issue is not of anything moral or righteous here. The issue is of power.

I cannot really conclude that my peeps here on this thread are in error. For they are right as there is threat, but surely an induced threat by the US government. If people fail to percieve this, then are lacking in cognitive faculties. It is ridiculous that some of you seemingly encourage a terrorist attack on your people and in your country. This is just vain. You see far, but you don't see far enough. You have an opinion, but your opinion does not favour you, your individual.

For example, it is unintelligent to have opinions such as some expressed in this thread. For such opinions are suitable for those who have some sort of incentive of power and are in a postion of authority. But you are just an individual. All you are entitled to is your freedom and that is all that you have to defend. But you side with those who want to exploit the very one thing you should hold most precious. And for what? You have no incentive to hold such an opinion. Why should you trade your freedom for security, with a government, you know is corrupt and in essence impotent? Maybe it is an ego issue and nothing else. Maybe you would like to feel important because only important people hold such opinions. The first truth is that it is not necessary to be important. First understand that. Then understand that you are not important. Because important people are the ones that have power and must control to obtain power. Then drop that nonsensical opinion.

Stop thinking like a politician or an army commander. You are neither. You are a free human being! For once, think for your own good.



hakushuku
 
The average lifespan of a species is 100,000 years. Looks like humans are no exception to the rule...we're not going to survive very much longer, we're just not favored for natural selection. All the damage we're causing to the environment, all the nuclear weapons, etc. I can see an end relatively soon
 
CrazyRussian said:
The average lifespan of a species is 100,000 years. Looks like humans are no exception to the rule...we're not going to survive very much longer, we're just not favored for natural selection. All the damage we're causing to the environment, all the nuclear weapons, etc. I can see an end relatively soon


take this for what you will.....but i've read books that compiled data found by "fringe" archaeologists and anthropologists. There are some out there that beleive the world has already undergone nuclear devestation. The evidence that they point to is that even here in North america, if you dig deep enough.....you'll come to earth layers that represent the surface of the earth from 6-10,000 years ago. And "supposedly" they've found numerous areas of the planet that had been hit with millions of degrees of heat and radiation......and in patches roughly the circumference of modern day nuclear weapons. I don't remember the exact discussion.......but main stream scientists attributed those layers to meteor hits......but there was some evidence, not sure what......but that piece of evidence, according to the fringe guys, showed without a doubt that a meteor could not have been responsible. As I said, take it for what you will.......because accepting that information on any level leads to the obvious and natural conclusion that we are not the first incarnation of man. Lot's of old documents speak plainly of ancient technological civilizations......of course they're just written off as science fiction writing......but it makes you think. I am convinced without a shadow of a doubt that current versions of human history are at the very least "revised" or "dubious"......at worst it's a possibility that it's all a joke. Everything we've known growing up could have been a giant lie??
 
Top Bottom