Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Testing products

  • Thread starter Thread starter Juice Authority
  • Start date Start date
Way too much liability for EF to be handling AAS. ANother problem that has reared its ugly head is with so many underground labs there is little or no quality control so one batch tested may be fine and another bunk.
 
I test almost all my gear- I know it gets expensive, but i just consider it a part of the expense of the cycle- it's real nice to KNOW what you got!! I guess just because a product can get a great review and then that company can pull the "bait and switch". If you test one product( company) and it turns out great, a year or so later they may be putting out trash knowing it will still sell because peole are still citing test results from a batch made a year and a half ago!!
 
Zyglamail said:
Way too much liability for EF to be handling AAS. ANother problem that has reared its ugly head is with so many underground labs there is little or no quality control so one batch tested may be fine and another bunk.

EF wouldn't be handling the AAS. Like I suggested earlier, one of us would send the sample to the lab to get tested. EF would simply handle the money end of it as far as gathering the funds those individuals who want a specific product tested and sending it off to the lab. I don't believe that would raise any legality issues plus it would be another way for the site to generate revenue.
 
Great idea JA but Citruside does have a point.My question is this it is one thing to find out if said product contains the drug in question but does it cost more to find out how many mgs per ml of said product.Lets say we send a primo amp and it tests positive does it cost any more to find out if it is 100mgs per ml.Either way I will pay , just wondering how it is tested , for the drug for potency or both again great idea.
 
3ccEOD said:
Great idea JA but Citruside does have a point.My question is this it is one thing to find out if said product contains the drug in question but does it cost more to find out how many mgs per ml of said product.Lets say we send a primo amp and it tests positive does it cost any more to find out if it is 100mgs per ml.Either way I will pay , just wondering how it is tested , for the drug for potency or both again great idea.

For a set price you get the mg dosage and whether or not it contains the active ingredient it's supposed to.
 
Don't think they would even handle the cash but maybe this could be sponsered by a lab and we would have a "savings account" that we would contribute to and than some products and they would than release the results. There would be a very big trust factor here on the lab and the handling of the funds. I knew ANSCI had this type of system amybe somebody here knows how it worked?
 
flexed1 said:
Don't think they would even handle the cash but maybe this could be sponsered by a lab and we would have a "savings account" that we would contribute to and than some products and they would than release the results. There would be a very big trust factor here on the lab and the handling of the funds. I knew ANSCI had this type of system amybe somebody here knows how it worked?

Maybe this a question for Rick Collins.
 
I am in either way,please PM me if the legalities of this issue stop it from happening the way you wanted it to.If not on a board there has to be some way we can work around this.Rick Collins please help!
 
EXCELLENT IDEA!!!!

JA ... I think that this is a great idea. I really just dont know how well it will fly. I think that someone may have to start a new website dedicated to testing gear. This would be the solution I think. Could be a little business op. if anyone is interested.

Also ... If I owned an UG lab, I would have a lab test that goes out with every new batch of gear. How great would that be for a lab to do. They would stand out miles above the other labs. If they have to charge an extra buck per vial or something to cover the costs than who the fuck cares ... Im sure that most people would be happy to pay for this. For example ... your source could post something like this for your list...


All products by "whatever labs"

Enanthate ..... 10ml/200mgs .......---$
EQ...................10ml/400mgs........---$
Prop................10ml/100mgs........---$
etc etc .....

Then have this ...

Lab Test for above mentioned products

Batch - 108466
Batch - 104389
Batch - 394012
Batch - 984021

Have these all hyperlinked to the lab test. Then when you get your products, you just check your batch number, and find out that your Enanthate was 214.56mgs/ml then go and jab yourself with a nice smile on your face, thinking to yourself ... "I am using the best UG lab, they are on the ball because they test and arent scared to share the results from every batch they make."

I wish that they higher-ups behind these labs would post on these boards every now and then so we could shout these ideas to them. Its all about good customer service. This is a business that they are running (i know .. an UG one .. but still). Who would you rather buy from ... a lab where you could check your results or a lab where you have no idea?

I would love to get LFC/Quest tested. I know that they are good products, both personally, and from others experiences ... but still... your cant explain how much a lab test puts you at rest. Its just so satisfying. LFC has been out for over a year now, and there has not been 1 lab test as of yet ... not one! I think that labs should start to produce these.

Or like I said before ... where someone starts an independent site devoted to testing products and samples random batches of different UG labs.

Mavy
 
Top Bottom