BiggT
New member
I'll give my opinion on TUT. This is just from my own personal experience. I don't put stock into studies performed on previously untrained 18 year olds or experiments with electrodes hooked up to people doing lat pulldowns.
When it comes to hypertrophy, I feel load is king, and progressively heavy training is optimal for hypertrophy of a natural trainee. Sets/Reps are way overrated, they do not matter as long as you're out of a heavily neural rep range (anything above max triples, really). The body isn't as smart as everybody gives it credit for. It can't count, and it can't tell time, it only recognizes work. It also doesn't get 'shocked', it simply responds to something that it was forced to do despite being unconditioned for the task. TUT has some validity, but I think it would best be talked about in terms of total workload or volume (work done)....I feel that sacrificing load and progress in order to take 10 seconds to do a bench press rep is not a very good idea (and for athletes it is a death curse, but thats another topic).
When you throw in AAS, you've got a new wrench in the argument. In terms of performance, training is still king, but in terms of physique, training takes a back seat as even the SHITTIEST, most inefficient, most idiotic training stimulus and "routine" will spark growth in most people who take enough drugs. This is where modern bodybuilding gets the "diet is 95%" thing. You have guys (and ladies too) running around with the testosterone levels of 50 teenage boys, so moronic training will be enough stimulus for incredible growth, then it is as simple as eaing for your goals.
But, to give my opinion, I think load and progression are far more important for hypertrophy than TUT.
When it comes to hypertrophy, I feel load is king, and progressively heavy training is optimal for hypertrophy of a natural trainee. Sets/Reps are way overrated, they do not matter as long as you're out of a heavily neural rep range (anything above max triples, really). The body isn't as smart as everybody gives it credit for. It can't count, and it can't tell time, it only recognizes work. It also doesn't get 'shocked', it simply responds to something that it was forced to do despite being unconditioned for the task. TUT has some validity, but I think it would best be talked about in terms of total workload or volume (work done)....I feel that sacrificing load and progress in order to take 10 seconds to do a bench press rep is not a very good idea (and for athletes it is a death curse, but thats another topic).
When you throw in AAS, you've got a new wrench in the argument. In terms of performance, training is still king, but in terms of physique, training takes a back seat as even the SHITTIEST, most inefficient, most idiotic training stimulus and "routine" will spark growth in most people who take enough drugs. This is where modern bodybuilding gets the "diet is 95%" thing. You have guys (and ladies too) running around with the testosterone levels of 50 teenage boys, so moronic training will be enough stimulus for incredible growth, then it is as simple as eaing for your goals.
But, to give my opinion, I think load and progression are far more important for hypertrophy than TUT.