hamstershaver said:
no samoth you tell me why blacks dominate those sports that i have mentioned, you are the one tooting your horn thinking you know everything
why are the fastest sprinters black?
why is 90% of the nba black?
why do the kenyans win every marathon?
why is 90% of the nfl wr and rbs black?
i will tell you why blacks dont dominate hockey, its because they dont play it
now are you telling me the reason blacks dominate these other sports is because they grew up poor? i really hope thats not going to be your answer
And let's say that I replace the above quote, but replace everything to say
why are the smartest programmers white?
why is 90% of academia white?
why do europeans and americans (whites) always rank #1 in academics?
why is 90% of nasa white?
So tell my why replacing <blacks> with <whites> and <physical> with <mental> is incorrect? They seem pretty diametrically opposite and one could argue their symmetry pretty well. It seem to me, that by
your logic, or alternate form thereof, allows for this to hold. I think it's more that I don't see the basis of your argument. Genetic superiority is a big claim... and it's also pretty easy to test for at the level you're touting.
There are already answers out there for the original question of this thread, although some of them are not as tangable as people are comfortable with. Anything involving statistics and interpretation is beyond the understanding of pretty much everyone in the world save math/stat majors and professionals in the field. (eg. you can use some obtruse stat equation with certain boundaries and intervals and say that "there is no statistical correlation between drunk driving and motor vehicle incidents." or whatever... that's how so many companies and advertising schemes can get away with what seems untrue or highly unlikely.)
The quote from GD is one of the bigger ones, and the most concisely stated one I've heard. I'm sure as hell not knowledgeble on this subject, but this kind of topic brings up so many logical infallacies and hogwash like "[physical] genetic superiority" that make it easy to jump in and say, "... and why exactly do you think what you're saying is true?".
Most often, I think people just want to argue for the sake of arguing, or to try to win... and not to uncover the truths and fallacies of the subject in question.
And I hope you're right. I'ma buy me a black man and put 'em in hockey shoes. He'll make me millions. Luckily, my superior white intelligence concieved of this first, before them black folk got the idea to take over these sports they're not well represented in and make all that money for themselves.