Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
MACRO/ULTER........Testing a new Aromatese Inhibitor Formula:
- Thread starter swordfish151
- Start date
brooklynheight
New member
oops mg. 
..but the shit works!!! 
..but the shit works!!!
A
Anthony Roberts
Guest
Ulter said:
Shouldn't people be evaluating the arguments I am putting forth? Rather than the person putting them forth? In logic (I have a degree in philosophy, with a concentration in logic), that is generally how one evaluates validity or soundness.
Also...how did mentioning my rugby career give weight to your argument or damage mine?
And since Macro can edit posts here, and you pay to be a sponsor here, aren't posts here just as valid as those on your "competitors board"?
You might have noticed that your posts, even though they aren't of any value, are still here. No one is deleting them. You're able to make whatever points you want to make. Minus the personal attacks that were deleted. So what's your bitch? Macro answered your questions and you simply reword them and ask them again. You've been going in circles all week.
You want to know our secret blend and you can't have it. That's pretty much the beginning and end of this but you keep rehashing it. You haven't made any arguments that have any bearing on the effectiveness of the product being evaluated.
Like I said, we've seen this type of assault on our products before. And hey guess what, those assaults all came from the people on the board you posted the link to. Those particular competitors assaulted our products and then some of them went on to copy them once they saw that our formulas worked better than they knew.
People need to know your background since you are making yourself out to be some kind of expert in steroids and chemistry. I simply pointed out that you are not. The majority of your book is filled with things you didn't author. You just parroted what you learned from the boards or had Nandi write it for you.
I am going to ask at some point that all your redundant posts get deleted because this thread was for people who are using the product to post on. You have soiled it instead of making your own thread.
You want to know our secret blend and you can't have it. That's pretty much the beginning and end of this but you keep rehashing it. You haven't made any arguments that have any bearing on the effectiveness of the product being evaluated.
Like I said, we've seen this type of assault on our products before. And hey guess what, those assaults all came from the people on the board you posted the link to. Those particular competitors assaulted our products and then some of them went on to copy them once they saw that our formulas worked better than they knew.
People need to know your background since you are making yourself out to be some kind of expert in steroids and chemistry. I simply pointed out that you are not. The majority of your book is filled with things you didn't author. You just parroted what you learned from the boards or had Nandi write it for you.
I am going to ask at some point that all your redundant posts get deleted because this thread was for people who are using the product to post on. You have soiled it instead of making your own thread.
A
Anthony Roberts
Guest
Where, once again, does my rugby career factor into this?
And....I ask again...if the posts on a board run by your competitor are invalid, then aren't posts here on this board invalid also, as are those on your own board?
And finally, I'd like to mention that Dan Duchaine had a degree in theatre arts, not a science. And HE developed the idea of topical yohimbe, by the way...years prior to you.
Also....I wish I had access to your library...not only does it contain thousands of dollars of "secret books" but it also has books that haven't even come out yet. If you get a chance, can you send me the next Tom Clancy book? It's not going to be out for a few months, but I'm sure you have it, since you seem to already know what's in my book. As for the comments on Nandi, I consulted with him quite a bit when he was alive, and can't really see the similarity between what he wrote and what I write, except for in a few places. He and JGUNS both said that any claims other wise must have been erroneous or misunderstandings. Oh...and in his last e-mail to me, he was very complimentary and brought up the possibility of me moderating on his board (they both did, actually). Do you think they (or he) would do that if I "stole" from him?
Would I dedicate my book to someone I stole from? You seem to know whats in it already...why don't you read the dedication in the front....you'll see Karl's name...
And....I ask again...if the posts on a board run by your competitor are invalid, then aren't posts here on this board invalid also, as are those on your own board?
And finally, I'd like to mention that Dan Duchaine had a degree in theatre arts, not a science. And HE developed the idea of topical yohimbe, by the way...years prior to you.
Also....I wish I had access to your library...not only does it contain thousands of dollars of "secret books" but it also has books that haven't even come out yet. If you get a chance, can you send me the next Tom Clancy book? It's not going to be out for a few months, but I'm sure you have it, since you seem to already know what's in my book. As for the comments on Nandi, I consulted with him quite a bit when he was alive, and can't really see the similarity between what he wrote and what I write, except for in a few places. He and JGUNS both said that any claims other wise must have been erroneous or misunderstandings. Oh...and in his last e-mail to me, he was very complimentary and brought up the possibility of me moderating on his board (they both did, actually). Do you think they (or he) would do that if I "stole" from him?
Would I dedicate my book to someone I stole from? You seem to know whats in it already...why don't you read the dedication in the front....you'll see Karl's name...
You don't mind if I ignore you from this point on do you? 6 times is my limit on reading the same post reworded. If you don't like the AI then don't buy it. In the mean time, everyone else will be using it, paying half as much money, and won't be drinking alcohol that comes from a bottle that says "not for ingestion".
A
Anthony Roberts
Guest
I'd also like to know why it is that when I write something that's 350+ pages long, and use some studies that apparently have been on the boards before, I'm stealing? However, when you "develop" a product thats already been written about (Duchaine wrote about a Yohimbe topical years before you had one), and or even been on the market already (sesa-whatever) it's good, solid research...?
When a competitor's board critique's a product it's invalid. Yet when yours does, it's valid?
When I ask questions, my integrity is questioned, and I'm subject to personal attacks on my character and ability....
Is this the "science" your product is based on?
When a competitor's board critique's a product it's invalid. Yet when yours does, it's valid?
When I ask questions, my integrity is questioned, and I'm subject to personal attacks on my character and ability....
Is this the "science" your product is based on?
When a competitor's board critique's a product it's invalid. Yet when yours does, it's valid?
I am talking about competitors that said R+ lipoic acid was a waste of money and 6 months later they were selling it. I don't care about anything my competitors say. I was pointing out the hypocracy of it and the fact they post attacks on the products without merit. Just like you're doing.
The rest of you post is more garbage I won't even bother with. Because it's been answered and you're repeating yourself.
Again, you have totally hijacked someone's thread and most of this will be deleted. You're more than welcome to start your own thread. That's what you should have done from the start. I am getting PM's and people are posting that they can't get the information they are looking for because of all the stupidity you've posted on someone else's thread.
I am talking about competitors that said R+ lipoic acid was a waste of money and 6 months later they were selling it. I don't care about anything my competitors say. I was pointing out the hypocracy of it and the fact they post attacks on the products without merit. Just like you're doing.
The rest of you post is more garbage I won't even bother with. Because it's been answered and you're repeating yourself.
Again, you have totally hijacked someone's thread and most of this will be deleted. You're more than welcome to start your own thread. That's what you should have done from the start. I am getting PM's and people are posting that they can't get the information they are looking for because of all the stupidity you've posted on someone else's thread.
Similar threads
