Razorguns said:I'm not even gonna point out the irelevancy of much of your post. I'll let it stand there to serve as a display of your ignorance.
I'll take on this point? "ACTIONS"?
What ACTIONS warrant shooting by a police officer?
Please do tell.
Oh, i know.
THREAT TO SAFETY.
Meaning:
BOMB == SHOOT TO KILL
NO BOMB == ARREST, TRIAL, JURY CONVICTION.
The cops arguments of "I think the guy had a bomb?" are right up there with incompetent cops proclaiming "I think the black guy had a gun".
I hope they interrogate this thoroughly and see just how exactly did they arrive at this "We think he has a bomb" scenario.
No one saw "wires", except, conveniently, the cops. I smell nothing more than an excuse for over-zealousness. A coverup. Oh, and that's MY opinion.
I love the apathy of the public. He's middle eastern, so automatically 90% of people have arleady made up the conclusion in their head. If it was a white female -- there'd be uproars everywhere ("C'mon, they really think a 23 y/o whtie female is a terrorist!! Idiot cops! MURDERERS!"). People are so predictable.
What isn't an opinion, and is the law, our basic freedoms -- is NOT SHOOTING SUSPECTS UNLESS LIVES ARE IN DANGER.
point blank. If you think otherwise, well let us know how the Komrade Party is coming along.
Ignorance is bliss.