Jailbait women are the best looking.

[velvett]

oh please. I'm 24 and clearly not looking for love. If that blossoms between us so be it. If you've never had just a sexual relationship that's fine but your insinuation that I don't respect this girl is based on what again??

You misunderstand me.

Sex is sex and should not be confused with love or even romance but you can have a sexual relationship/affair whatever you want to call it without using the word BANGING to describe it.

It sounds trashy to use BANGING as an adjective - FUCKING is even better. (that's the disrespectful part)

Yo, check out this chick I'm bangin'.

 

[jerseyart]

Society has a way of expecting you to feel guilty for sexual activity that it doesn't condone. It reinforces this by outlawing such sexual practices.

Until recently homosexuality was outlawed and anyone who practiced it or even felt it was marginalized and supposed to feel guilty and ashamed of what they did. On top of being a criminal.

As society has become more tolerant towards homosexuality and as homosexuality has become legal underage sex is the new big bad boogeyman. If the 'moral majority' had its way anyone having sex with someone under the age of 18 (Or why not make it 21?) should go to jail. If you have sex with a 17 year old then that would make you a disgusting paedophile.

Age of consent laws in most countries have very little to do with when teenagers start to be sexually active in reality, and more about enforcing societys' moral code.

That's absurd, and a little disturbed.

Sexual consent laws have nothing to do with preventing minors from having sex. They are designed to prevent minors from being used by adults who could use their experience/authority to take advantage of a minor.

Ideally children would not be having sex at all, since they are ill equipped to handle any negative emotional/physical/ or financial outcomes. But if they are going to do it, at least allow it to be with someone whom they are more likely to share an equal footing with, not some sick fuck adult who is too intimidated by a more grown mature woman, and only feels confident molesting children

 

[GoldenDelicious]

That's absurd, and a little disturbed.

Sexual consent laws have nothing to do with preventing minors from having sex. They are designed to prevent minors from being used by adults who could use their experience/authority to take advantage of a minor.

Ideally children would not be having sex at all, since they are ill equipped to handle any negative emotional/physical/ or financial outcomes. But if they are going to do it, at least allow it to be with someone whom they are more likely to share an equal footing with, not some sick fuck adult who is too intimidated by a more grown mature woman, and only feels confident molesting children

i wouldnt say its absurd. although i dont quite agree that society is perpetually in need of a 'bogeyman', i do agree with max in the arbitrary age clearly dileanating 'underage' and legal sex rather abruptly as being stupid

where do you draw the line, after all? 16? 17? 20? hell while we're at it, why dont we use a sliding scale so that you can have sex with a minor if youre also a minor, or within a certain (also arbitrary) age of said minor.

since we all want to regulate sex, why not throw in some alcohol/emotional scaling- why is is illegal to have sex with a 17 year and 363 day year old who is sober and emotionally immature, but perfectly fine to have sex with a mentally impared, heavily intoxicated 18 and one day year old?

i fully agree that the law is in place to protect the weak from exploitation and what have you, but i think that a law that relies entirely on age as the discriminant is fundamentally flawed, and also affects social perception of sex poorly. people are stupid, and will automatically assume that something illegal is wrong, even when it isnt.

i have some rather nice plans for some young ladies (which i fully intend to follow through with) and if past experience with others in their social group is anthing to go by, "a good time will be 'ad by all"

 

[velvett]

That's absurd, and a little disturbed.

Sexual consent laws have nothing to do with preventing minors from having sex. They are designed to prevent minors from being used by adults who could use their experience/authority to take advantage of a minor.

Ideally children would not be having sex at all, since they are ill equipped to handle any negative emotional/physical/ or financial outcomes. But if they are going to do it, at least allow it to be with someone whom they are more likely to share an equal footing with, not some sick fuck adult who is too intimidated by a more grown mature woman, and only feels confident molesting children

OMG!

Something we agree on.

 

[jerseyart]

Golden,

You are addressing the limitations of any law intended to govern the conduct of 300 million individuals. It is inconceivable that every given contingency can be taken into account, and no law is perfect. In most cases the we rely on judges,juries, and DA's to take the individual circumstances into account, and meet out justice accordingly. It isn't always perfect, but no one has come up with a better way.

And I think you have it backwards. It isn't that the law creates the impression, but rather that the law reflects the values of the society as a whole. I suggest your viewpoint on this issue would be in a distinct minority, and will likely change if and when you have children of your own (if you already do not).

We can't protect everyone from everything, nor would I wish to live in such a rigorous society. But at minimum a society should do what it can, whenever possible, to protect the weakest and most vulnerable to abuse and exploitation.

WTF is sexy about a child is beyond me. I can't even comrehend the motivation that would cause one to pursue such an action regardless of the law. How can a kid provide anything above a peice of flesh, and an underdeveloped one at that. WTF, it isn't like grown women are hoarding it from guys

 

[velvett]

A friend of mine parted ways with her 25 year old boyfriend (she was also 25 at the time, now 26) back in May of 2004. Rumors had been floating the early part of summer that he was dating/sleeping with a 15 year old (his little sister’s best friend). Long story short, the rumors were true and the after the parents of the 15 year old found out the girl was shipped out to live with family in Texas.

I think what most people find disturbing is that he babes and protects his little sister from guys that do just what he did with his sister’s best friend.

Oddly enough, if she were three years older no one would care either way which seem to be somewhat hypocritical.

 

[jerseyart]

A friend of mine parted ways with her 25 year old boyfriend (she was also 25 at the time, now 26) back in May of 2004. Rumors had been floating the early part of summer that he was dating/sleeping with a 15 year old (his little sister’s best friend). Long story short, the rumors were true and the after the parents of the 15 year old found out the girl was shipped out to live with family in Texas.

I think what most people find disturbing is that he babes and protects his little sister from guys that do just what he did with his sister’s best friend.

Oddly enough, if she were three years older no one would care either way which seem to be somewhat hypocritical.

Three years makes a big difference, epsecially at that age. Hell, the difference between 12 and 14 is amazing.

There is no "ideal" cut off age, because everyone is different. The number seems arbitrary to some. Others would prefer it lower or higher. Frankly I think out of high school is about the best we can do. Let them have their time as children before they are forced to take on the clothes of adults.

 

[PIGEON-RAT]

I don't understand how it is that for THOUSANDS of years women were fully capable of being mothers from age 12 onward, but once Christian morals took over, they're not ready to have sex until they're 18.

As soon as society gave the excuse that teenagers weren't mature and able to handle themselves, the teenagers began to fit the mold.

Personally I would want to have children with a woman as early as possible so her eggs have not gone through as many harmful mutations from a lifetime of being bombarded with the radiation of cosmic rays.

And I'm writing about having children because that's what my sexual urges are for. We are human animals and more people need to come to terms with this fact.

 

[jerseyart]

Pigeon,

Yeah and for thousands of years anyone stronger than you could kill you, steal your family, abuse your children, and then sell them off into slavery. Those were the good old days.

 

[PIGEON-RAT]

That's not the point. My point is that young women fully had the capabilities to be MOTHERS, and raise families. Now today they're not capable to even have sex without the childbirth?

How did they all the sudden become incapable?