George Spellwin could you explain the logic behind the moderator position?

[Fonz]

Re: Logic?

I highly doubt there is any logic.

The people recently adopted as Mods very likely were the few people who wrote George about the board...granted it was likely in a self-serving, ass-kissing manner. The squeeky wheel syndrom. They addressed their concerns and suggestions to George and seeing as the last batch of mods had less than 60% activity....it's better than having 40% of nothing.

If you looks at the spectrum of new mods, especially on the anabolic board, it's a rather poor line-up (no offense). But I think it's funny that ya'll get tiffed about the mods on the chat board....afterall it IS a chat board.

The most that needs to be removed or edited would be source posts. Not really looking at a lot of power really. Oh and view IP addresses, which none of them could do anything with in the first place

Well, you're entitled to your own opinion.

However, if George sees this thread he's going to crack up.

Truthfully, until about 3 days ago I had no idea I was
in the running to be a MOD.

And even George can attest to the fact that I've never
written to him about being a MOD.

I suggest that if you're going to put down people from
a different board, you POST YOUR OBJECTIONS THERE.

Better yet, I'm moving this thread.

Godspeed

 

[Austin316]

Fonz, you were a good choice, OTHERS weren't

 

[r00+]

Hehe

Wow, Fonz. I must have hit a nerve.

natasan,

Good point.

But let me get this straight. If none of the new mods 'expected' this. Then was the choice random? That sounds pretty silly. Not really dangerous, since being a mod is a lot like being a digital janitor...no real rights.

 

[Slice of Peach2]

Re: Hehe

Wow, Fonz. I must have hit a nerve.

natasan,

Good point.

But let me get this straight. If none of the new mods 'expected' this. Then was the choice random? That sounds pretty silly. Not really dangerous, since being a mod is a lot like being a digital janitor...no real rights.

Who cares? Why can't you just give us a chance?

 

[r00+]

Go for it.

Oh, don't get me wrong. I'm behind the mods. I just think it's frivilous to randomly appoint mods.

Moderator Lottery is a tough method to pull off and get away with competant mods.

 

[Fonz]

Re: Hehe

Wow, Fonz. I must have hit a nerve.

natasan,

Good point.

But let me get this straight. If none of the new mods 'expected' this. Then was the choice random? That sounds pretty silly. Not really dangerous, since being a mod is a lot like being a digital janitor...no real righ
ts.

If you truly think the new A-board mods got picked at random
I SUGGEST you go use the search function.

Everything that needs to be said is there.

Godspeed

 

[Warik]

Waahh!

-Warik

 

[r00+]

Haha

Ok, polling users is pretty random. Since there is no criteria for who can or cannot vote, the system leaves itself open for serious tampering; creating new users to nominate yourself, brand new users voting when they've read two or three threads etc etc.

Yes, it's democratic. But in a democratic society there are criteria for valid voters.

 

[BigJay81]

Re: Re: Hehe

Who cares? Why can't you just give us a chance?

Because you post you tits your a mod???????????????

thats why!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NEVER MIND I HAVE TO REMEMBER THIS IS THE CHAT BOARD!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Slice of Peach2]

Re: Re: Re: Hehe

Because you post you tits your a mod???????????????

that why!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hello!!!! I don't think so.

I am out of this discussion. There is no reasoning with you.