MattTheSkywalker said:
Same is true of alcohol. We've survived. And while cocaine is terribly addictive (preferred to food by rats - I am sure you know the experiment) - not every cocaine user will become an addict.
it isnt only the incidence of addiction which is greater but also the degree of addiciton. i can assure you, widespread use of cocaine would be far more problematic than that of ethanol. furthermore, the mode by which the drugs are administered and the severity of an overdose in the case of cocaine would undoubtably lead to deaths on the spot, as well as a probable equivalence in road deaths.
personally i think ethanol use should be controlled. cars should be fitted with immobilisers as standard, and greater efforts should be made to modulate underage (and general) binge drinking
its all very well to say its up to the person but in practice, there are a lot more associated and follow on problems
MattTheSkywalker said:
I can't see you or your peers doing it wither. That's why I would sell cocaine in retail stores a lot like liquor.
all that would do is dodge the issue. indiscriminate consumption, and inevitably the adverse health effects associated with such consumption, would follow.
if you truly have been front row to addiction, you have seen how amazingly destructive powerful addiction can be. the face of our society would change as a result of the legalisation of cocaine and similar drugs. there isnt a facet of life that wouldnt change. the number of unviable individuals would skyrocket. too many things to chat about, really.
MattTheSkywalker said:
Consider also the huge numbers of people who do not ocntruibute because they are imprisoned on drug charges. (More of a US problem perhaps) Not only are they unproductive, but it costs $40,000US per year to "house" them.
thats true, but im sure that imprisonments due to violent crime would increase. so many other industries would shit themselves that such economic rationalisms are negated
MattTheSkywalker said:
At least if they have to buy their drugs from a legitimate operation, they have to earn money to buy them.
(yes, some people prefer crime to earning money. This doesn't change whether or not drugs are legalized).
true. but if you consider that it would cost a dollar a day to get absolutely wasted, i dont think that the aquisition of money to buy drugs is going to be a terribly strong motivator.
MattTheSkywalker said:
Actually, the biggest anti-legalization lobby is by far the pharamaceutical industry, which would ratehr see you on Zoloft for your depression than cocaine.
i didnt know that. they probably want you alive and well, paying tax to fund your long, slow rot (ahem, i mean prescription retirement) rather than offing yourself
OR theyre lobbying against marijuana...now that would put a hole in their pockets