Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Evidence that the government is responsible for 9/11 twin towers (movie)

Testosterone boy said:

All of the Bin Ladens living in America were allowed to depart without any questioning about their knowledge of OBL.



Dont know about all the rest but this was on that Cdn documentary I was watching earlier and is a proven fact.

Skies all over North America are quiet but a bunch of planes carrying Saudi's are taking off and heading home on the Auth of the US. Government. and no questions asked.

Looks real good there Georgie boy!
 
That article brings up a good point but it was very poorly written.

Examples:


"First of all, the Boeing 757 and 767 aircraft are probably equipped with remote-controlled flight computers for purposes of hijack recovery. This was stated by a British intelligence operative and was also suggested by a former German secretary of defense. The technology needed for such systems is well known, and its utility is obvious. If these systems had been operative on 9/11, then they should have been used to take control from the hijackers."


"Secondly, the US air force has standard operating procedure to send jet fighters to intercept hijacked aircraft within minutes after they are reported. These fighters may be armed and are certainly very maneuverable, and an airliner cannot hope to match them."



Were the plane highjackings even reported? And are the 757's and 767's equipped with this technology? or not?
 
ChewYxRage said:
That article brings up a good point but it was very poorly written.

Examples:


"First of all, the Boeing 757 and 767 aircraft are probably equipped with remote-controlled flight computers for purposes of hijack recovery. This was stated by a British intelligence operative and was also suggested by a former German secretary of defense. The technology needed for such systems is well known, and its utility is obvious. If these systems had been operative on 9/11, then they should have been used to take control from the hijackers."


"Secondly, the US air force has standard operating procedure to send jet fighters to intercept hijacked aircraft within minutes after they are reported. These fighters may be armed and are certainly very maneuverable, and an airliner cannot hope to match them."



Were the plane highjackings even reported? And are the 757's and 767's equipped with this technology? or not?

One would think that Air Force jets could have easily intercepted Boeing 767 number 2. The question is...................why not? :confused:
 
My understanding was, the ones with that technology had it installed in the tracking box, which the terrorists removed.

I could be wrong though.

ChewYxRage said:
That article brings up a good point but it was very poorly written.

Examples:


"First of all, the Boeing 757 and 767 aircraft are probably equipped with remote-controlled flight computers for purposes of hijack recovery. This was stated by a British intelligence operative and was also suggested by a former German secretary of defense. The technology needed for such systems is well known, and its utility is obvious. If these systems had been operative on 9/11, then they should have been used to take control from the hijackers."


"Secondly, the US air force has standard operating procedure to send jet fighters to intercept hijacked aircraft within minutes after they are reported. These fighters may be armed and are certainly very maneuverable, and an airliner cannot hope to match them."



Were the plane highjackings even reported? And are the 757's and 767's equipped with this technology? or not?
 
Code said:
My understanding was, the ones with that technology had it installed in the tracking box, which the terrorists removed.

I could be wrong though.

So the hijackers removed the anti-hijacking equipment? This keeps getting better and better.

You can count on our major media NOT running a show about 9/11 irregularities though.
 
I know I am late into this thread, but here is some info on general building collapse.

Steel does not have to melt to cause a collapse. Steel expands as it is heated at a rate of 1.4"/20' length at a temp. of 1,000 degrees F. This expansion pushes out on the supporting beams and walls, causing a failure in the integrity of the structure.
Also at 1000 degrees F., the yield point of stress of steel drops from 36,000psi to 18,000psi, and at 1,200 degrees from 36,000psi to 10,000psi.
So at 1,000 degrees you have both a weakening and lengthening of the steel beams, causing structural failure. {IFSTA building Construction Related to the Fire Service, 2nd Edition}

As for the collapse coming straight down, all the collapses I have seen, either from fire or weakening of the foundation , have come straight down( gravity pulls down, not to the side.)
 
LTFFMED said:
I know I am late into this thread, but here is some info on general building collapse.

Steel does not have to melt to cause a collapse. Steel expands as it is heated at a rate of 1.4"/20' length at a temp. of 1,000 degrees F. This expansion pushes out on the supporting beams and walls, causing a failure in the integrity of the structure.
Also at 1000 degrees F., the yield point of stress of steel drops from 36,000psi to 18,000psi, and at 1,200 degrees from 36,000psi to 10,000psi.
So at 1,000 degrees you have both a weakening and lengthening of the steel beams, causing structural failure. {IFSTA building Construction Related to the Fire Service, 2nd Edition}

As for the collapse coming straight down, all the collapses I have seen, either from fire or weakening of the foundation , have come straight down( gravity pulls down, not to the side.)



The WTC was designed to withstand the impact of a Boeing 707, a very similarlt sized plane.

Not one tower but two towers came down in an absolutely identical manner despite the fact that a skyscraper had never done this before in our history. Fine.

Why don't you explain why Silverstien said we made a decision to "pull" Building 7 that afternoon. This should be good for a chuckle.
 
Last edited:
And airbags were "Designed" to save lives but they don't work all the time, now do they?



Testosterone boy said:


Good night....one of our gov intel guys registrers under another name to say this crap?


The WTC was designed to withstand the impact of a Boeing 707, a very similarlt sized plane.

Not one tower but two towers came down in an absolutely identical manner despite the fact that a skyscraper had never done this before in our history. Fine.

Why don't you explain why Silverstien said we made a decision to "pull" Building 7 that afternoon. This should be good for a chuckle.
 
You heard it first here, supernav must be known as the guy who broke this one wide open!!

You're Woodward to my Bernstein.



supernav said:
the Mars Rover thing is just some fancy gizmo in a sound stage in van nuys, ca.

-= nav =-
 
supernav said:
typical americans. After every big event -- the conspiracy folks come out in force. I bet even the Mars Rover thing is just some fancy gizmo in a sound stage in van nuys, ca.

-= nav =-

Agreed
 
Top Bottom