Evidence that the government is responsible for 9/11 twin towers (movie)

[PIGEON-RAT]

The only constants in his story is that he has yet to provide documentation on anything he's ever said.

Ever.

 

[Code]

A challenge for you to read?
I guess so.

is that a challenge?

 

[alien amp pharm]

“Fire melts steel,” Burns said. In addition, he said, the impact of the plane could have severely damaged the building’s sprinklers, allowing the fire to rage, despite fireproofing supposed to protect steel columns and beams.

“You never know in an explosion like that whether they (the sprinklers) get cut off,” Burns said.

That just backs up what I said earlier.

Sure the building could withstand a plane impact. Heck wind loads can be large on a multi-story building like that. I'm sure it was over designed for such.

No matter if the sprinkler system was damaged or not, it's not going to put out a fire of that magnitude.

And of course the designer/engineer isn't going to say "it was no suprise my building would collapse". Of course he is going to back up his creation.

 

[NJjuice22]

Try reading the links I have mentioned, you'll see your "unsourced" measurements don't add up to mine, for any plane.

your one of those morons afraid to admit when they are wrong...here is a link to fuckin boeings site with meaurements.

http://www.boeing.com/commercial/767family/pf/pf_200prod.html

 

[buddy28]

here you go.


767-200 767-400ER
Dimensions:
Length 159' 2" 201' 4"
Wing Span 156' 1" 170' 4"
Height 52' 0" 55' 0"



Weights (lbs):
Empty 178,400 228,000
Fuel 112,725 162,500
Payload 43,200 N/A
MTOW 315,000 450,000
MLW 272,000 330,000

http://www.jersey-va.co.uk/Aircraft-specs/boeing_767.htm

 

[Code]

Until now there was no reason to admit anything, it took you this long to get a link posted. Brainiac.

your one of those morons afraid to admit when they are wrong...here is a link to fuckin boeings site with meaurements.

http://www.boeing.com/commercial/767family/pf/pf_200prod.html

 

[NJjuice22]

That just backs up what I said earlier.

Sure the building could withstand a plane impact. Heck wind loads can be large on a multi-story building like that. I'm sure it was over designed for such.

No matter if the sprinkler system was damaged or not, it's not going to put out a fire of that magnitude.

And of course the designer/engineer isn't going to say "it was no suprise my building would collapse". Of course he is going to back up his creation.

everything your saying is just an assumption, steel does not melt from an ordinary fire, which is what that still was...here is a link that could explain how the steel could have melted.

http://www.wpi.edu/News/Transformations/2002Spring/steel.html

 

[the nature boy]

Melting point of steel: 2,500 degrees Fahrenheit, (F) or 1,370 degrees Celcius, C

http://education.jlab.org/qa/meltingpoint_01.html

how hot does jet fuel burn?

 

[buddy28]

Code, your ass just got smoked homie. What u gonna do now?

 

[alien amp pharm]

Let's see one post says the melting point of steel is 2500 d F and another says 2800 d F.

No matter, check into the temp of burning jet fuel

_________

"The buildings were designed for a three-hour fire rating, which means the buildings could resist a fire up to three hours without serious structural damage. However, the ratings are associated with tests based on "ordinary" fires, not the degree involved in the Sept. 11 attack.

He added that a flame burning jet fuel and air generates an approximate temperature of 3,500 degrees Fahrenheit — "more intense than any fire code scenario.""
________

http://www.dailyillini.com/sep01/sep20/news/stories/news_story02.shtml