Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Evidence that the government is responsible for 9/11 twin towers (movie)

supernav said:
typical americans. After every big event -- the conspiracy folks come out in force. I bet even the Mars Rover thing is just some fancy gizmo in a sound stage in van nuys, ca.

-= nav =-
Typical supernav right here.

I am still waiting for an explanation of why Silverstein said that they made a decision to "pull" Building 7.

If a good explanantion can be made then other things are possible.
 
For the record....I really do want an explanation of why Silverstein said that they made a decsion to "pull" Building 7 that afternoon. A "pull" is a controlled demolition.

I just can not ignore evidence that is so completely blatant.

It would be comforting to go around with my head in the sand like so many others.

I really don't like to believe that Building 7 got "pulled" but Silverstein is on tape saying that is what they did.
 
I do agree here. It makes little sense to destroy a building so early. It could have have evidence in it since no one really knew what the hell happened at the time they "pulled" it.

Testosterone boy said:
For the record....I really do want an explanation of why Silverstein said that they made a decsion to "pull" Building 7 that afternoon. A "pull" is a controlled demolition.

I just can not ignore evidence that is so completely blatant.

It would be comforting to go around with my head in the sand like so many others.

I really don't like to believe that Building 7 got "pulled" but Silverstein is on tape saying that is what they did.
 
Code said:
I do agree here. It makes little sense to destroy a building so early. It could have have evidence in it since no one really knew what the hell happened at the time they "pulled" it.

Far more questionable than the decision to pull it is the fact that they lacked the time to study the blueprints and plant the explosives that day.

There is no way that they could decide to pull Bldg 7 minutes after the towers got hit. So the charges were planted prior to 9/11.

Just happened to be a govt bldg housing CIA/FBI/ and NYCs emergency something.
 
If the building contained classified information that the CIA felt would be compromised, I can see the need to destroy it.

Certainly not within that timeframe though.

Testosterone boy said:
Far more questionable than the decision to pull it is the fact that they lacked the time to study the blueprints and plant the explosives that day.

Just happened to be a govt bldg housing CIA/FBI/ and NYCs emergency something.
 
Code said:
If the building contained classified information that the CIA felt would be compromised, I can see the need to destroy it.

Certainly not within that timeframe though.

Silverstein made the decision...not the CIA.
 
Code said:
How could he get a permit to demo it that fast?

Thats a small problem comapred to the fact that it appears that the explosives were planted prior to 9/11.

I just don't think they would decide to pull it in the morning and be able to do it that afternoon when they are coping with fire in the building.
 
Top Bottom