Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Do you believe in Mythical Creatures such as:

foreigngirl said:
opinion is one thing. I have my opinion about what a law should mean and be, but you, as schooled on that subject, would know better and I would not even try to argue it with you. Because I realize that you went to college for that and that you know better than I do...on that subject. Just the same as me knowing more than you on myths and you should respect that fact and not try to prove me wrong and prove yourself right. Cuz I wouldnt do that to you on a subject that you went to school for.

What I just pointed out and it WAS ment for the thread starter - that it was the wrong term calling chupacabra, bigfoot etc mythological, cuz they are not.

On the rest of your posts here, I agree with you.
If you want to argue that they shouldn't be called myths if they are derived from eyewitness accounts, I have no problem with that. That really has nothing to do with my points. On the other hand, samoth very clearly has labeled all these creatures as myths.

FG, I have studied other things besides law. Law is 3 years of graduate school. Undergraduate school was 4 years of liberal arts which is attended first.

If we made people have a college degree on here for every thread topic, this chatboard would get very quiet.
 
heatherrae said:
If you want to argue that they shouldn't be called myths if they are derived from eyewitness accounts, I have no problem with that. That really has nothing to do with my points. On the other hand, samoth very clearly has labeled all these creatures as myths.

FG, I have studied other things besides law. Law is 3 years of graduate school. Undergraduate school was 4 years of liberal arts which is attended first.

If we made people have a college degree on here for every thread topic, this chatboard would get very quiet.

its one thing studying something just as a general knowledge and its different when you study it at depth. Everyone has general knowledge of things, but they specialize in only one subject.. Yours is law, mine is literature.
 
foreigngirl said:
its one thing studying something just as a general knowledge and its different when you study it at depth. Everyone has general knowledge of things, but they specialize in only one subject.. Yours is law, mine is literature.
We aren't arguing literature.
 
this thread is clear supporting evidence that HR needs her own tv show where people call in to ask questions, cuz she got all da anzerz. case closed.
 
swole said:
this thread is clear supporting evidence that HR needs her own tv show where people call in to ask questions, cuz she got all da anzerz. case closed.
Sorry that you take offense that I have opinions on topics. I'll try to giggle and look cute when I see you coming so as to not offend your sensibilities on how a woman should behave.
 
foreigngirl said:
Are you fuckin serious?!!!!!!! You found to tell me that myth is not literature? I wonder than why the fuck did I spend 2 semesters in college, majoring in literature and languages, studying myths and comparative literature......
Myths exist inside and outside of literature. Read the definition. I didn't create the definition. Argue with the people at Random House...:lmao:
 
heatherrae said:
Myths exist inside and outside of literature.
I am sorry....but how is it that they exist outside literature? There you go again with that "I know everything" attitude. You are right now about making me wanna take a huge book of myths and slam it over your head. Even oral myths are literature because they fall into category folklor which is still literature
 
Top Bottom