Dballer and other classic car people, what would you do???

[beefybull]

I'm with you on just about everything there. Except maybe the 64' impala(which I would replace with a 67-69 firebird), and the 2002 Cadillac Seville(reminds me of senior citizens). Some nice cars otherwise...

64 Impala is probably the sweetest convertible I've ever seen. 67-69 Firebirds are good but I like the 1979-1981 Firebirds better. That Seville is usually bought by old people, drug dealers, or pimps, but thats not to say others cant enjoy it, lol. I test drove one, I bet they could smoke 90% of the cars on the road. 4.6L V8 Northstar engine putting out 300hp factory. Not bad for an "old person's car"

 

[ladymacbeth]

[Anyway, dballer, I'm going to go spy on that camaro before I go to the gym...how can I tell if it's a 68 or 9?

Look at the tail light (it's easy)
67= 1 light section
68=2 tail light sections
69= 3 tail light sections

Look @ dballers pictures again and you'll see the difference.
Hope this helps. [/B][/QUOTE]

I talked to dball about this, but the front made me think it was a 70, as in the link I posted. But the taillights wrapped around, which put it a bit later. Guess I was completely wrong. Ah well, at least I knew it was a camaro.

 

[Daeo]

64 Impala is probably the sweetest convertible I've ever seen. 67-69 Firebirds are good but I like the 1979-1981 Firebirds better. That Seville is usually bought by old people, drug dealers, or pimps, but thats not to say others cant enjoy it, lol. I test drove one, I bet they could smoke 90% of the cars on the road. 4.6L V8 Northstar engine putting out 300hp factory. Not bad for an "old person's car"

They have some power, don't get me wrong. But like you said it's only owned by one of three people usually. And that usually is old people. I'm not really a sedan man...