Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Comhrac Bas???

I saw his video.
Nothing special only the pop up.
When you push the guy up and he falls.
If I want street combat, I would probably take Paul Vinak.
 
poisonorangeboy said:
Judo Tom. The question that you've asked and the way that you have worded it in relation to my post makes it very simply " non sequitur ". To use an analogy , you have handed me three wax crayons all of them one colour, blue for example. You are now pointing at the crayons and asking me, which one is the blue one? I'm not asleep at the wheel here. I only had to read three of your eight hundred ninety seven posts to see what you're up to. Now, lets read the Oxford dictionary. SPAR. to make the motions of " boxing " without landing heavy blows. Okay, for the sake of argument that the Oxford is too British lets read the American Heritage dictionary of the English language,fourth edition. SPAR. to make boxing or fighting motions without hitting one's opponent. to fight with an opponent in a short bout or ( practice bout ) as in boxing or martial arts. I interpret that as either light contact or no contact at all. So, what about this " practice session " ? PRACTICE. to do or perform habitually. to exercise oneself in or on , to instruct , to exercise , ( to drill ). To DRILL! That's interesting isn't it? This would suggest to me that these drills that we do that you have such disdain for are in fact what you call sparring. Do you understand non sequitur now? Personally I distinguish between spar and drill. DRILL. colloquialism. A recognized procedure. Military- instruction or training in military exercise. ( rigorous discipline ) or methodical instuction. impart by strict method. RIGOROUS DISCIPLINE. strict , ( severe ) , precise , stringent , inclement , ( harsh ). With us, severe and harsh enough to make body armour mandatory. Do we spar? Yes. When we practice the elements of boxing , the hook , jab , overhand , cross and uppercut we spar. How do we spar in boxing? We wear headgear , gloves , and mouthguards and we make contact. How do we go one hundred percent? Simple. We speed up the technique. In my post I said " when necessary , appropriate protective gear is used ". If this gear was not used when we " drill " our high impact techniques , severe injury or death would occur. I'm not talking about boxing. I also said " to be clear , Comhrac Bas is a combat survival discipline ". So, here's what Comhrac Bas is not. It is not self defense. It is not sport fighting. It is not a martial art. You cannot use martial arts or sport fighting as reference to ask questions of what is done in Comhrac Bas. It doesn't translate. I also said that this has urban and military applications. We drill combat. Who else drills combat? Delta Force. The Seals. The French Foreign Legion. Other elite units , and why do we drill combat? One hundred percent combat is killing. In your own words from one of your own posts " most aikido schools do not " spar " enough and rather just do drills in pre arranged motions ". I would put to you that you have equated drills with kata. Drills are not kata. KATA. a system of basic body positioning and movement exercises , as in karate or JUDO . Kata is done in martial arts. We don't do kata. It's not in our curriculum. You see , I don't care how many times you bastardize the English language to make yourself shine. You can't toss words around like you're throwing bread crumbs at pidgeons. Drill means drill. Spar means Spar. Form , Kata , Style , Fight , Combat , all have their own separate definitions and are not interchangable. The fact that this is commonly done does not make it correct. Fighting is what you do with somebody . Combat is what you do to somebody. Some people just don't get that! That's not my problem. I could elaborate on a lot of what I've said here. I have neither the time nor the inclination. I have no doubt that you have an agenda and that you will choose to be deliberately obtuse and repudiate what I've put here. I don't care. As far as I'm concerned I was finished with this thread when I posted K_O_S . I'm quite done with it now.



read george orwell's essay, "politics and the english language".
 
I can't believe you spoke to JudoTom like that. You are an jerk no matter what art you study and you would get clowned if you came to my school.
 
EVERYONE OF YOU ARE MISSING THE DAMN POINT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Before you guys make points about chris clugston and comhrac bas at least get your facts straight. I'll make them simple:

1. I bet at least 8/10ths of you never watch chris clugstons tapes which means if your beating on chris then your nothing more than a detractor who talks tough behind a computer

2. For people who think that chris is teaching things that the gladiators used....guess wut.....ur dead wrong!!!!!! Chris teaches a fighting system based on wut the gladiators did: surviving. Guess what...ironically thats wut chris had to do on the streets: SURVIVE. Chris shares on wut he did on the streets and he relates his experiences on what the gladiators did which is to save ur life and the loved ones around you.

3. Yes chris lost a couple of in the ring fights in Tulsa. Fights in the ring are different from fights in the streets. Comhrac Bas moves are illegal for fights in the ring. The pop up, the wedge, the low line moves, getting to the neck, just to name a few are all illegal in the ring. So therefore chris had to do things in the ring that he wouldn't be doing in the streets. Also keep in mind that in the ring fights are won by either knock out or points. In the streets there are no points. Yea there are knock outs but the way knock outs are made in the streets are different then they are made in the ring. On the streets there is full commitment which makes the fight last only 5 - 30 seconds. You never see a fight last for 5 - 30 seconds that often in the ring do you!!!!

4. The main attribute that separates chris clugston's fighting system with other fighting systems is exactly the word that i just said : attribute. Why do martial arts or other fighting systems, MMA, wrestling, Oriental, teach you moves which you have to do over and over again??? It's because they are based on attribute. So if u had to do a move you just learned once in your life without any continuous repetition on that move in the streets against any kind of fighter chances are you'll lose. Even if that move is a punch which we all know that some people punch better than others. So even the punch is attribute driven. Chris's moves are natural movements. So they are performance driven. You don't need to practice those moves over and over again to master them. Which means you can learn them once and do them to anyone on the streets. What proof that chris's moves work?? How about that chris did the moves he teaches hundreds of times on the streets to ensure that they work. This brings me to my next point.

5. Believe or not 99% of all people who claim to be world class street fighters even though they have never street fought in there entire lives are martial artists. Just because you train a lot....even if you've been training for years...doesn't mean your world class unless you have fought on the street consistently enough to know if your moves work. This goes for everyone: MMA, wrestling, boxing. kick boxing, military, even myself, etc etc: if you haven't fought consistently enough in the streets then you can't talk about how to survive in the streets everyday. And for those of you who are confused about this comment you must read my next point:

6. I did mention myself in point number 5. Yes to this point I haven't had the opportunity to survive in the streets. But at least I am man enough to admit it. Most people who train in any fighting system will do there best to avoid this very simple but powerful question: Have you ever fought consistently enough in the streets? The reason is because they haven't been there enough to say that what they are teaching works. Chris Clugston has been there done that enough times in his life to know that what he teaches works. Since i have learned from chris clugston i know that i can survive a street confrontation because i learned from a guy that teaches what he did on the streets over and over again. I am not a world class street fighter. I am a trained fighter.

So overall get your facts straight before you start making comments
 
Top Bottom