Wildebeest
New member
No offense Bro, but 22% is fat. Your cycle will bloat you and make you bigger. Your muscle gain may bring fat with it.
The effects of the T-3 and albuterol will not even be noticed with the amount of fat you have on you now. Your remark about it not working for me made me laugh out loud.
Your best bet is to stick with what you know works: your diet and exercise. Taking hormones and research chemicals without an extensive knowledge of diet and exercise, which you have not demonstrated yet, will leave you with sub par results.
Ok, I get that you're trying to do the right thing as far as you know. But are you basing this on your own personal knowledge or science? I'm being stubborn, yes, but only because you have been all over my thread but have yet to refute any of my points with any degree of science or reason.
"Your cycle will bloat you and make you bigger. Your muscle gain may bring fat with it."
How would this happen on a calorie deficit? I'm not looking to gain muscle - and at 2400 calories, I doubt that's going to happen. I'm looking to prevent muscle loss!
"The effects of the T-3 will not be noticed"
An increase in metabolic rate is an increase in metabolic rate. The speculated increase in metabolic rate of Albuterol/T3 is 10% of BMR. I'm pretty sure that's arbitrary, but I'll give you that and admit that's not a whole lot and I can understand why you'd think it's useless.
But then you must realise, this is is EXPONENTIALLY increased with exercise. And therefore, with significant daily cardio and resistance training, there should be a significant increase in calorie output on the stack.
Then you couple that with the synergistic beta-2 activation that it has with Albuterol and one can expect that much more adipose tissue is going to be broken up into free-fatty acids and available to be used as a fuel source.
The test base, nutrient partioning effects of t3 and high protein intake should prevent muscle from being used as an energy source (or at least greatly minimise the occurence of that). Moreover, I eat the majority of my calories around my workout period so nutrient timing to promote anabolism (or at least anti-catabolism) should be sound.
So if diet+exercise was going to work anyway, diet+exercise+t3+alb+test should work a hell of a lot better since the calorie deficit that would've burned muscle and fat will significantly more fat and significantly less muscle. If I keep a calorie deficit of about 5000 cals a week, that should translate to 18 lbs of fat lost over 12 weeks, and hopefully barely any muscle, which will bring me to my target 13%.
"Without an extensive knowledge of diet and exercise, which you have not demonstrated yet"
I have state and national rugby, boxing and jiu jitsu awards. I've got a fair knowledge of diet and exercise. No one ever told me I needed a six-pack to be an athlete. I wasn't a 286lbs dickhead eating potato chips and jacking off to Burger King ads all day.
I'm sure the cycle itself is solid. If anything, I'm worried that cals and carbs may be too low and I risk overtraining. So maybe now you can give me some SCIENTIFIC REASONING and show me that you actually know your shit.
I'm willing to be proven wrong, but if all you have is snotty broscience, please go sucker some other fat dude.