RyanH said:
The insanity defense is rarely ever successful, and when it is, its usually less desirable than getting a normal sentence.
I don't know about you, but spending a few months in some type of mental institution (isolated from humanity... yay!) knowing full well that I am perfectly sound of mental health is certainly more appealing than watching my back and refusing to shower for a few decades.
RyanH said:
That aside: Warik you are using EMOTIONS in your argument. You still haven't offered a sound policy reason for punishment as opposed to reform....
Emotions? I'm using fact. Please be so kind as to quote some of my emotional outbursts.
I have given you a sound reason. Appropriate punishment = it doesn't happen again. Reform = he'll do it again after you're foolish enough to unleash him on society.
RyanH said:
since we know that punishment is not usually a deterrent.
How do you figure? Many murder/rape/violent crime offenders are repeat offenders.
A man who is permanently behind bars or taking an eternal dirt nap CANNOT COMMIT CRIMES. Surprise! Less crime.
RyanH said:
I bet if we devoted more of our resources to reform as opposed to throwing criminals in jail, we would see a reduction in crime.......
Reduction in crime? (Petty theft, drug abuse, traffic violations) Sure! Shoplifters will get jobs... drug abusers will get counseling... traffic violators will learn to drive safely.
Reductions in
violent crime? (Murder, rape, armed robbery, domestic abuse) You wish. A murderer is a murderer. A rapist is a rapist. If your idea of reform is blatant brainwashing, then I fully support it. Otherwise, I don't see any "proof" of your reform ideas being any better than my ideas. As a matter of fact, my ideas are
clearly more effective.
A dead man cannot commit murder.
RyanH said:
Punishment is usually a guaranteed failure. Criminals need help, not a dark jail.....
Criminals need to pose for Satanic Goatslayer's pics.
-Warik