Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Would you Rather....

WODIN

बुद्धकर&
Platinum
Spend two days and two nights in grizzly-bear-infested wilderness with bloody steaks strapped to your torso

OR

swim through a quarter of a mile of shark-infested waters with bloody fish tied around your waist?
 
I'd go the route with the bears. At least I could hopefully climb a tree, and if it's not breaking the rules, I could throw the steaks at the bears.
 
There are no rules grand master DigiK.

No trick BB..


Think about it...

Bears can run @ about 35 - 40 MPH for about 200 yards.

Sharks can "smell" blood in the water from about 1.5 to 4 miles away.

You can run @ tops around 22 - 25 MPH.

I don't know how fast the avg. human can swim, but I don't think its anything nearly as fast as a shark.
 
Puc had a tummy tuc remember... he's not nearly as fat as he use to be.
 
bears as you have more advantages and tools on land than in the sea
 
i'd definitely go with the bears. bears are generally pretty afraid of humans (i'm hoping) so they could be scared off. sharks on the other hand, show no fear no matter what. if you ditch the steaks or fish, you're still better off with the bears since the bears would go for the steaks and pretty much leave you alone while the sharks go into a "feeding frenzy" in which you're pretty much fucked.
 
bears dudes. with the sharks, not only would you have to worry about being ripped apart and eaten to death, as you would with the bears, but you would also be drowning at the same time. I'll pass.
 
Vix honey you know I love your tender booty.

How about this one:

Feel Snakes crawliing across your feet

OR

feel bullet ants crawling in and out of your nostrils?
 
Top Bottom