Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

WHO do you think should be TIME'S MAN OF THE YEAR.

RyanH said:


yeah, Really. I've read about one thousand farewell letters on ELITE, and guess what? They always come back the next day, thus completely making their farewell letter total bullshit.
Anybody else notice that the board is 90% male yet 90% of the threats to leave are made by the females. Makes them 100 times more likely to threaten to leave. I believe this is a significant finding and a strong statement about the stability of many women.
 
freak daddy said:

Giuliani is'nt the President. I could'nt give a shit who gets man of the year. That is not my argument. I agree that Rudy was extremely heroic. That was'nt a place for the President though. My sister works for Bush, and after hearing about the shit that went down on the 11th in Wash., I think it would have been asinine for Bush to go back to Washington right away. These are just my opinions.
I couldn't agree more. What good would it accomplish to have Bush in Washington when it is under attack. To do so would be as stupid as to put your general on the front line.
 
RyanH said:


because its common knowledge that Hussein wants nuclear weapons and is linked to terrorism. Sufficient reason to take him out, eh?

Bush didn't though, in spite of this evidence.

Thus, that makes Bush a dumbfuck decisionmaker.
We left Saddam inpower because taking him out would have allowed Iran to over run Iraq, they were drooling at the possibility. It also would have unleashed unfathomable terrorism against the U.S. because those dumb Iraqi's truly love Saddam.

I would have hoped a promising law student could conjure up more intelligent adjectives than "dumb f**k".:(
 
spentagn said:


So all of a sudden it's common knowledge that Hussein is linked to terrorism? If I said attack Baghdad, you'd ask for proof. Let's see your proof Ryan.



So now it's the president that decided foreign and military policy? Yet when people praise decisions that W make you denounce their knowledge by stating

Which is it?
Very good points. A knock out blow to the offense mounted by ryanH in my opinion.:)
 
karde said:
I think we have had many presidents far more immoral than clinton. U. S. Grant comes to my mind.
Grant was an alcoholic but he still doesn't hald a candle stick to "scandal a week Bill Clinton." He got elected with scandals being reported and he went out perpetrating more scandals. It is in his blood.:mad:
 
RyanH said:


and Bush Sr. let Hussein live. that was a brilliant decision, wasn't it?

Bush let him live because of Iran----Bush destroyed all his nuclear weapon capabilities. When Hussenin was flying high again and was to believed to have these capabilities, it was when Clinton was president.

A better question is what did clinton do about it????

Nothing --Bush Jr. is going to have to fix what clinton was to chicken shit to do.
 
RyanH said:


because its common knowledge that Hussein wants nuclear weapons and is linked to terrorism. Sufficient reason to take him out, eh?

Bush didn't though, in spite of this evidence.

Thus, that makes Bush a dumbfuck decisionmaker.

But in 8 years of clinton what did clinton do to fix this so-called problem? Wouldn't that make clinton and even an even more dumbfuck decisionmaker. Place tell us what that conflict was about because apparently some of us don't know. And you must have some inside detailed info on it.
 
Wombat said:

Nothing --Bush Jr. is going to have to fix what clinton was to chicken shit to do.

That's because Bush is so incredibly BOLD & COURAGEOUS, right?

Let's review Bush's acts of courage:

---Getting the fuck out of D.C. while other leaders in NYC were running to help those struck by terrorism

---Not serving in Vietnam

---Being too spineless to stand-up to the religious right by not selecting religious radicals such as John Ashcroft to be Attorney General

Bush talks a good talk, but he's never put his life in danger in anyway what so ever......Thus, he's no more of a courageous leader than Presdent Clinton is.

Again, Bush is weak.
:die:
 
Test boy said:


I would have hoped a promising law student could conjure up more intelligent adjectives than "dumb f**k".:(

O.K. So Bush is a reckless, unthoughtful-decision-maker.:D
 
RyanH said:


the Russian economy is finally beginning to flourish after decades of strife.

His efforts in reaching out to all Americans.

the Presidents of Russia and the US are hanging out as opposed to aiming missles towards one another.

good reasons, I think.

Flourish---thats pretty funny--there living in the 20th century and any progress that is being made is with our tax dollars.

Reaching out to americans--another funny statement-this guy has no choice. They either have to get into the game or watch american go so far ahead of them that they could never catch us. Thats a simple task. He is not doing this on his own. He is being taught by his "now" so called american friend. But we will see how long that friendship lasts.

Why was'nt your friend Clinton hanging out with the president of russia? Because he couldn't--You don't think clinton would have loved to be doing what Bush is doing. But Bush is the dumbfuck---

Ryan--you really have to get over all of this. The country has come together and you want to pull it apart.
 
Top Bottom