Whites Only Scholarship

[ChefWide]

Again. You avoid the question. Another conservative not up to an intellectual challenge from a liberal. Typical.

 

[Longhorn85]

Again. You dislike and therefore reject the answer. Another self-proclaimed wanna be intellectual liberal unwilling to face the truth.

 

[ChefWide]

Again. You dislike and therefore reject the answer. Another self-proclaimed wanna be intellectual liberal unwilling to face the truth.

You are living up to your reputation, a spin laden neo-con parrot that ineptly recasts what hears or reads like a broken record or silly Newt Gingrich guideline pamphlet, but when challenged to defend his dishwater thin arguments, simply cannot. Once again, with a now sadly comic level of familiarity, you timorously spin your way as far as possible away from standing up to your own unsound statements.

Your conservative comrades on this board, the ones with inspiring intelligence, such as Matt and Atlanta, must be cringing with embarrassment to have you attempt to place yourself among their ranks. I am continuously entertained by the fact that every time we continue this back and forth, you display your ineptitude and contemptible lack of honour by continually avoiding a direct challenge to your mettle.

 

[BO-DEN]

You are living up to your reputation, a spin laden neo-con parrot that ineptly recasts what hears or reads like a broken record or silly Newt Gingrich guideline pamphlet, but when challenged to defend his dishwater thin arguments, simply cannot. Once again, with a now sadly comic level of familiarity, you timorously spin your way as far as possible away from standing up to your own unsound statements.

Your conservative comrades on this board, the ones with inspiring intelligence, such as Matt and Atlanta, must be cringing with embarrassment to have you attempt to place yourself among their ranks. I am continuously entertained by the fact that every time we continue this back and forth, you display your ineptitude and contemptible lack of honour by continually avoiding a direct challenge to your mettle.

damn...









OWNED

 

[Longhorn85]

You are living up to your reputation, a spin laden neo-con parrot that ineptly recasts what hears or reads like a broken record or silly Newt Gingrich guideline pamphlet, but when challenged to defend his dishwater thin arguments, simply cannot. Once again, with a now sadly comic level of familiarity, you timorously spin your way as far as possible away from standing up to your own unsound statements.

Your conservative comrades on this board, the ones with inspiring intelligence, such as Matt and Atlanta, must be cringing with embarrassment to have you attempt to place yourself among their ranks. I am continuously entertained by the fact that every time we continue this back and forth, you display your ineptitude and contemptible lack of honour by continually avoiding a direct challenge to your mettle.

Are you still here? Haven't you had enough? You are living up to your reputation as a weak-minded liberal who is so full of himself that he can't admit when he is wrong. You pull out the Newt Gingrich comparisons when you get really pissed.

Ironically, you probably see yourself as some open-minded do gooder, when in fact you exhibit a kind of racism and condescening attitude, as do most liberals.

Why must you assume that my ideas are parroted? You are too stupid to give me credit for my own thoughts as you I assume have your own thoughts.

You display your lack of honor and bruised ego by continuing this argument long after you've lost it, adding bigger and bigger words, as if that will somehow strenghten your point. It doesn't.

I don't expect to hear from you on this thread again, but I'm sure I will.

Get over yourself.

 

[BO-DEN]

Are you still here? Haven't you had enough? You are living up to your reputation as a weak-minded liberal who is so full of himself that he can't admit when he is wrong. You pull out the Newt Gingrich comparisons when you get really pissed.

Ironically, you probably see yourself as some open-minded do gooder, when in fact you exhibit a kind of racism and condescening attitude, as do most liberals.

Why must you assume that my ideas are parroted? You are too stupid to give me credit for my own thoughts as you I assume have your own thoughts.

You display your lack of honor and bruised ego by continuing this argument long after you've lost it, adding bigger and bigger words, as if that will somehow strenghten your point. It doesn't.

I don't expect to hear from you on this thread again, but I'm sure I will.

Get over yourself.

na not good enough


(pitbull with no teeth)

BO-DEN

 

[ChefWide]

1. Are you still here? Haven't you had enough? You are living up to your reputation as a weak-minded liberal who is so full of himself that he can't admit when he is wrong. You pull out the Newt Gingrich comparisons when you get really pissed.

2. Ironically, you probably see yourself as some open-minded do gooder, when in fact you exhibit a kind of racism and condescening attitude, as do most liberals.

3. Why must you assume that my ideas are parroted? You are too stupid to give me credit for my own thoughts as you I assume have your own thoughts."

4. You display your lack of honor and bruised ego by continuing this argument long after you've lost it, adding bigger and bigger words, as if that will somehow strenghten your point. It doesn't.

5. I don't expect to hear from you on this thread again, but I'm sure I will.

Get over yourself.

1. It would be difficult to evaluate 'wrong', as you have yet to explain yourself as challenged. A quick search on EF will find no other references made by me to Newt Gingrich.

2. Boring, meaningless tripe that draws no meaningful conclusion and sheds no light on why you still cower from accepting a direct challenge. Amazing how, when cornered so plainly, you find the need to resort to so tired a bag of tricks as these.

3. Why do I assume your thoughts are parroted? Because when you quickly rattled off those infantile and indefensible examples, you were completely unable and unwilling to defend them. You call into question the true author of your insights as a whole when you resort to running from a call to clarify what you profess.

"You are too stupid to give me credit for my own thoughts as you I assume have your own thoughts." Was that intended to sound confused? Bravo, a job well done.

4. My point is so very simple: you have yet to answer the call to explain yourself. Please take notice my use of short, easy to understand words in this post.

5. You will continue to hear from me as long as you posture and flap your wings about like a cock in battle, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing. You need not do so and need not hear from me again on this topic, if you would simply do as you were challenged to do.

You will not, however, stand like a man of honour and simply answer the challenge.

You will do the following: you will complain about how long this has gone on, you will make another observation that you won a skirmish in which you have yet to display the courage to enlist, you will prance and pose about how I am doing this or that, without actually doing anything on your own to call this matter to a conclusion. You will hope, in vain, that by ruffling your feathers enough and acting the victim enough, that this challenge will go away. You will again comment about how we should be through with this drama, hoping to secure the last word.

You may be right about your tedious little war of attrition, actually, as you are a most tiresome quarry, never putting up a good fight, never doing much at all really, other than what you are so well known for: running in circles just long enough to bore everyone into submission.

 

[Dial_tone]

You two clowns are going to make this my longest thread ever.

 

[Longhorn85]

Chef Wide, add to your qualities: hypocrite. You have at least one other thread working that you refuse to respond to. You felt it necessary to pm me to get me to respond again and again here. How about finishing what you started elsewhere? I'm finished with you here.

http://boards.elitefitness.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=301872

 

[BO-DEN]

Chef Wide, add to your qualities: hypocrite. You have at least one other thread working that you refuse to respond to. You felt it necessary to pm me to get me to respond again and again here. How about finishing what you started elsewhere? I'm finished with you here.

http://boards.elitefitness.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=301872

ROFLMAO


WHAT A FUCKING LOOSER



BO-DEN