Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Whites Only Scholarship

sh4dowf4lcon said:
I agree with scholarships for whites 100%.

I mean if there are scholarships for other skin colors, whites should be treated the same. united whitey college fund!! woohoo Im IN!!

also I thinnk I got post 100!!


Then you'll be happy to know that Alabama State has offered scholarships to white students FOR YEARS! It's not like this kid invented the wheel or something. This has been done for a long long time.
 
Hengst said:


You proved my point, we are not created equal. and I do mean genetically. some are smarter some are stronger, some are dumber some are weaker.

We are however, supposed to be equal under the law. Affirmative Action negates that principle.

do a search on my posts jethrow

iv been requesting a hoalicost of the geneticly weak for years.

but you still didnt have any photos of your claims of being superior

so be a sport and prove my point...

BO-DEN
 
ChefWide said:



Wrong again and most unfortunately so.

You see, I called you out. Directly.

CHALLENGED you to back up your child like examples and make sense out of completely misunderstanding my post. You came back with some limp dishrag comment about your examples being in need of some 'aid'. Knowing that you would cower away from my slaughter of your sophomoric attempt at rejoinder, I suggested you make some concrete examples available, of which you had, in your words, 'many, many' at your immediate disposal, and you dished up some local boys club??!? You embarrass yourself.

After naming specifics that were obviously pulled out of the wrong hat, you fail completely to save face by using a flaccid generalization. You were challenged twice, and twice you turned tail and ran.

For a moment there, you almost earned my respect until you mistook my good natured attempt to spare you the further humiliation of calling attention to your cowardly and total avoidance of my direct challenges to you.

You sir, do not have the class or social presence to tip your hat when you have been bested.

Now, I say again as clearly as is possible: Come forward with your promised explanations and solid examples of real world programs as I demanded you do in the first place, or consider yourself a coward and, to opt an EF mot juste, ‘owned’.

Are you schizo or what? Are you trying to be my buddy or insult me? Doesn't matter, just try to be consistent.

I have not been bested, on the contrary. I proved my point, and that is that there will often be a level of exclusivity in many groups that are good for society. Boys Clubs and Boy Scouts are great examples, not my fault you don't like them.

Your argument was that ANY group that is exclusive should not receive federal help (check your previous post). You cleary didn't think before you typed that one, unless you want the Campfire Girls disbanded. Question is, who decides which exclusive groups qualify for funding or tax breaks?

Here's a tip: try to keep the personal attacks out of your argument and you will be much more effective.
 
The Nature Boy said:



good luck dude.

As usual, you have nothing significant to add to the argument. Your contributions are limited to smart-ass one-liners and the echoing of other's points.

I suggest you read more, then try again in about a year.
 
ttlpkg said:


Are you schizo or what? Are you trying to be my buddy or insult me? Doesn't matter, just try to be consistent.

I have not been bested, on the contrary. I proved my point, and that is that there will often be a level of exclusivity in many groups that are good for society. Boys Clubs and Boy Scouts are great examples, not my fault you don't like them.

Your argument was that ANY group that is exclusive should not receive federal help (check your previous post). You cleary didn't think before you typed that one, unless you want the Campfire Girls disbanded. Question is, who decides which exclusive groups qualify for funding or tax breaks?

Here's a tip: try to keep the personal attacks out of your argument and you will be much more effective.

I have to quote a couple messages I recieved: Dont bother with ttlpkg, he will just avoid the challenge, he is known for it. Another said: He will keep replying without ever coming to the plate and answering, he probably cant anwer it anyway.

That makes three direct challenges from me on this thread alone for you to explain your examples, and to give the 'many many' more examples you offered.

You know what? You chickened out. No the boys club/boys scouts are really lame examples, I even took the time once to show how they fail so miserably, I am not going to waste the effort to do it again, you will just avoid the topic, as apparently you have become infamous for doing.

As to who should make the call; what part of my short, plain, concise answer to that exact question did you not understand?

Here's a tip: you might get better treatment if you stood up a little straighter and confronted the questions as asked, rather than spin around them.
 
ChefWide said:


I have to quote a couple messages I recieved: Dont bother with ttlpkg, he will just avoid the challenge, he is known for it. Another said: He will keep replying without ever coming to the plate and answering, he probably cant anwer it anyway.

That makes three direct challenges from me on this thread alone for you to explain your examples, and to give the 'many many' more examples you offered.

You know what? You chickened out. No the boys club/boys scouts are really lame examples, I even took the time once to show how they fail so miserably, I am not going to waste the effort to do it again, you will just avoid the topic, as apparently you have become infamous for doing.

As to who should make the call; what part of my short, plain, concise answer to that exact question did you not understand?

Here's a tip: you might get better treatment if you stood up a little straighter and confronted the questions as asked, rather than spin around them.

you forgot my quote

"ttpkg was born without traps"


lol he never responds to the topic... he evades the truth because the truth would destroy the la la land he has surrounded himself with.

chefwide is correct.

BO-DEN
 
ChefWide said:


I have to quote a couple messages I recieved: Dont bother with ttlpkg, he will just avoid the challenge, he is known for it. Another said: He will keep replying without ever coming to the plate and answering, he probably cant anwer it anyway.

That makes three direct challenges from me on this thread alone for you to explain your examples, and to give the 'many many' more examples you offered.

You know what? You chickened out. No the boys club/boys scouts are really lame examples, I even took the time once to show how they fail so miserably, I am not going to waste the effort to do it again, you will just avoid the topic, as apparently you have become infamous for doing.

As to who should make the call; what part of my short, plain, concise answer to that exact question did you not understand?

Here's a tip: you might get better treatment if you stood up a little straighter and confronted the questions as asked, rather than spin around them.

I'm not interested in messages you received from others that think like you. Not looking from any type of treatment from you either.

Find another argument. You lost this one.
 
Top Bottom