Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 
Summary - (Oct 27, 2005) Geologists have come up with two measurements of radioactive decay to calculate when the Earth's core separated from its crust, but the problem is, these two numbers don't match. Researchers from the University of Bristol think that the giant collision that occurred early on in Earth's history - which went on to form the Moon - might have reset one of these "countdown clocks" and created the discrepancy.
Full Story -
New research allows geologists to estimate the time at which the Earth's core separated from its rocky outer shell.
Our planet. Image credit: NASA/JPL. Click to enlarge.
A paper in this week’s Nature [26 October 2005] shows how the problem can be resolved by considering the effect of a giant impact with the Earth.
Previous research, using two different types of radioactive ‘clocks’ (hafnium-tungsten and uranium-lead), appeared to give conflicting core formation times of about 35 and 80 million years, respectively, after the origin of the solar system.
The collision of a Mars-sized object with the Earth is thought to have contributed to the last ten percent of the Earth's mass, as well as forming the Moon.
"The explanation may be that the hafnium-tungsten clock represents the initial phase of core formation, whereas the uranium-lead clock, that gives a younger age, has been reset by the upheaval introduced by the giant impact."
Professor Bernie Wood
Professor Bernard Wood, who completed this research while at Bristol University, and Professor Alex Halliday from Oxford University, propose that the impact would have also changed the conditions of core formation.
They put forward a model that explains the discrepancy between the two isotope clocks if the effects of the oxidation state of the mantle are taken into account.
Professor Wood said: “The explanation may be that the hafnium-tungsten clock represents the initial phase of core formation, sometime before 35 million years after the origin of the solar system, whereas the uranium-lead clock, that gives a younger age of about 80 million years after the origin of the solar system, has been reset by the upheaval introduced by the giant impact.”
The impact could have produced an oxidation state under which a sulphur-rich metal formed – of which the core is now composed. This oxidation state would have readily allowed lead to dissolve, effectively resetting the uranium-lead clock and resulting in the younger age.
Source: Universe Today
Original Source: University of Bristol News Release
Full Story -
New research allows geologists to estimate the time at which the Earth's core separated from its rocky outer shell.
Our planet. Image credit: NASA/JPL. Click to enlarge.
A paper in this week’s Nature [26 October 2005] shows how the problem can be resolved by considering the effect of a giant impact with the Earth.
Previous research, using two different types of radioactive ‘clocks’ (hafnium-tungsten and uranium-lead), appeared to give conflicting core formation times of about 35 and 80 million years, respectively, after the origin of the solar system.
The collision of a Mars-sized object with the Earth is thought to have contributed to the last ten percent of the Earth's mass, as well as forming the Moon.
"The explanation may be that the hafnium-tungsten clock represents the initial phase of core formation, whereas the uranium-lead clock, that gives a younger age, has been reset by the upheaval introduced by the giant impact."
Professor Bernie Wood
Professor Bernard Wood, who completed this research while at Bristol University, and Professor Alex Halliday from Oxford University, propose that the impact would have also changed the conditions of core formation.
They put forward a model that explains the discrepancy between the two isotope clocks if the effects of the oxidation state of the mantle are taken into account.
Professor Wood said: “The explanation may be that the hafnium-tungsten clock represents the initial phase of core formation, sometime before 35 million years after the origin of the solar system, whereas the uranium-lead clock, that gives a younger age of about 80 million years after the origin of the solar system, has been reset by the upheaval introduced by the giant impact.”
The impact could have produced an oxidation state under which a sulphur-rich metal formed – of which the core is now composed. This oxidation state would have readily allowed lead to dissolve, effectively resetting the uranium-lead clock and resulting in the younger age.
Source: Universe Today
Original Source: University of Bristol News Release
